Cited by 18Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Study of 45 candidate genes suggests CACNG2 may be associated with lithium response in bipolar disorder

Open access

Abstract

Background Bipolar disorder is a neuropsychiatric disorder that is characterized by fluctuations between manic and depressive phases. Lithium is the original and best mood stabilizing treatment for bipolar disorder. While its mechanism is not well understood, it is believed to have a strong genetic component, as several studies suggest that lithium responsiveness, in bipolar disorder, is heritable. In this study we aimed to identify genetic variants that are associated with lithium responsiveness in bipolar disorder.Methods Here we present two cohorts; a retrospective cohort in which patients were surveyed about their response to lithium, and a prospective cohort, in which patients were placed on a lithium monotherapy and monitored for their response to lithium. In both cohorts, patients were stratified into two categories in terms of lithium response; good responders and poor responders. 45 genes were selected based on previous associations with lithium pathways or bipolar disorder and 684 SNPs within these genes were selected to test for association with lithium response.Results While no single SNP was significant after correcting for multiple comparisons, there were several that were nominally significant (p < 0.05). Of these nominally significant SNPs, the most highly significant SNP in both the prospective and retrospective cohorts were found to be in CACNG2, or Stargazin. The second best association with lithium response was several SNPs in NRG1, a gene that has previously been associated with schizophrenia.Conclusions Evidence for the association of lithium response with SNPs in CACNG2 is consistent with previous findings that have identified CACNG2 as associated with both bipolar disorder and lithium responsiveness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.010

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CACNG2 gene, encoding a voltage-gated calcium channel, has repeatedly been implicated in mood regulation and impulsivity across cohorts.

    “The CACNG2 gene, encoding voltage-gated calcium channel, has repeatedly been implicated in mood regulation and impulsivity across cohorts (39).”

    From Exploring the neurobiological markers of suicidal behaviors in pediatric population: a narrative review (2026) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports CACNG2 associations with bipolar disorder and nominal associations with lithium response in two cohorts, but it does not report an association with impulsivity. It describes stargazin as structurally similar to a voltage-gated calcium-channel subunit while emphasizing its demonstrated role as an AMPA-receptor auxiliary subunit; calling it a voltage-gated calcium channel overstates that description. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Miranda, A., Shekhtman, T., McCarthy, M., DeModena, A., Leckband, S. G., & Kelsoe, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Kelsoe, John R.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
248
Pages
175-179
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910587240
Cited by
18
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • UCSD (T32 GM008666)
  • Department of Veterans Affairs (I01CX000363)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
bipolar disorder, lithium response, stargazin, neuregulin-1, single nucleotide polymorphisms, candidate genes, genetic association, mood stabilizers, genetic susceptibility
MeSH terms
Pharmacogenomic Variants, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Bipolar Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Calcium Channels, Lithium Compounds, Antimanic Agents, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review