Cited by 21Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Prefrontal activity during experimental ostracism and daily psychache in suicide attempters

Open access
Olié, Emilie, Husky, Mathilde, Bars, Emmanuelle Le, Deverdun, Jeremy, de Champfleur, Nicolas Menjot, Crespo, Adrian Alacreu, Swendsen, Joel, Courtet, Philippe·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Suicidal behaviors can result from a complex interaction between social stressors and individual vulnerability. Evidence suggests a specific neural processing of social cues in suicide attempters without knowledge of how it relates to real-world experiences. Objective To investigate the association between brain activity during experimental social exclusion (measured by functional MRI) and psychological pain in daily life (assessed by Ecological Momentary Assessment) in patients with a lifetime history of suicide attempt. Methods Thirty-three euthymic females with a history of a major depressive episode were recruited: 13 suicide attempters and 20 affective controls (no history of suicide attempt). Functional MRI scans were acquired while participants played the Cyberball game, a validated social exclusion paradigm. After fMRI, participants completed EMA for a one-week period. Five times per day, they were asked to rate their psychological pain, hopelessness and the negativity of daily events. EMA indices (psychological pain, hopelessness and their interaction with negative events) were correlated with cerebral activations using a ROI approach (orbitofrontal, dorsal and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices, anterior cingulate cortex and insula) in each group. Results We found a negative correlation between daily ratings of psychological pain and orbitofrontal activation for exclusion versus inclusion during the Cyberball game in suicide attempters but not in affective controls. We did not find correlations between cerebral activation and daily hopelessness ratings. Limitations Small sample size CONCLUSION: Scanner-based orbitofrontal activity during social exclusion relates to psychological pain in daily life which participates in suicide risk among vulnerable individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.087

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brain areas linking suicidality with psychological pain include the insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and orbitofrontal cortex.

    “Brain activity studies during social exclusion procedures point to the insula, anterior cingulate cortex [28], and the orbitofrontal cortex [29] as the brain areas linking suicidality with psychological pain.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Jollant, F., Lawrence, N.L., Olie, E., Guillaume, S., Courtet, P., 2011. The suicidal mind and brain: a review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies. World J. Biol. Psychiatry 12, 319-339.
  2. Schmaal, L., van Harmelen, A.L., Chatzi, V., Lippard, E.T.C., Toenders, Y.J., Averill, L.A., Mazure, C.M., Blumberg, H.P., 2020. Imaging suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a comprehensive review of 2 decades of neuroimaging studies. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 408-427.
  3. Schneidman, E.S., 1996. The Suicidal Mind. Oxford University Press, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olié, E., Husky, M., Bars, E. L., Deverdun, J., de Champfleur, N. M., Crespo, A. A., Swendsen, J., & Courtet, P.
Affiliations
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
285
Pages
63-68
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3127358468
Cited by
21
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR MNPS 2009)
  • CHIST-ERA
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
suicide attempters, social exclusion, ostracism, psychological suffering, emotional pain, orbitofrontal cortex, prefrontal cortex, Cyberball game, hopelessness, everyday life, major depressive episode, suicide risk
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Social Isolation, Suicide, Attempted, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review