Cited by 52Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

A therapist-guided smartphone app for major depression in young adults: A randomized clinical trial

Open access
Raevuori, Anu, Vahlberg, Tero, Korhonen, Tellervo, Hilgert, Outi, Aittakumpu-Hyden, Raija, Forman-Hoffman, Valerie·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meru Health Program (MHP) is a therapist-guided, 8-week intervention for depression delivered via smartphone. The aim was to test its efficacy in patients with clinical depression in a Finnish university student health service. METHODS: Patients (n=124, women 72.6%, mean age 25y) were stratified based on antidepressant status, and randomized into intervention group receiving MHP plus treatment as usual (TAU), and control group receiving TAU only. Depression, measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale, was the primary outcome. After baseline (T0), follow-ups were at mid-intervention (T4), immediately post-intervention (T8); 3 months (T20), and 6 months (T32) post-intervention. RESULTS: The intervention group and control group did not have significant differences in depression outcomes throughout end of treatment and follow-up. Among secondary outcomes, increase in resilience (d=0.32, p=0.03) and mindfulness (d=0.57, p=0.002), and reduction in perceived stress (d=-0.52, p=0.008) were greater in MHP+TAU versus TAU at T32; no differences were found in anxiety, sleep disturbances, and quality of life between groups. Post-hoc comparisons of patients on antidepressants showed significantly greater reduction in depression at T32 for MHP+TAU versus TAU (d=-0.73, p=0.01); patients not on antidepressants showed no between-group differences. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include unknown characteristics of TAU, potential bias from patients and providers not being blinded to treatment group, and failure to specify examination of differences by antidepressant status in the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Most outcomes, including depression, did not significantly differ between MHP+TAU and TAU. Exploratory analysis revealed intervention effect at the end of the 6-month follow-up among patients on antidepressant medication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.007

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Randomized control trials using online mindfulness interventions addressing students' mental health have proven to be effective.

    “Randomized control trials using online mindfulness interventions addressing students’ mental health have proven to be effective [11, 12, 14, 24–26]”

    From Effectiveness of online mindfulness interventions on medical students’ mental health: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Discussion describes a randomized trial of a mindfulness-based app among patients recruited from university students’ health services. The Secondary outcomes section reports reduced perceived stress and improved resilience, but the Discussion says the app provided no additional benefit over usual treatment for depression, the trial’s primary target. The broad claim that the intervention was effective therefore overstates this trial’s findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raevuori, A., Vahlberg, T., Korhonen, T., Hilgert, O., Aittakumpu-Hyden, R., & Forman-Hoffman, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Meru Health, Inc. (United States) (US)
  • Finnish Student Health Service (FI)
Corresponding author
Raevuori, Anu
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
286
Pages
228-238
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128131918
Cited by
52
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
major depressive disorder, young adults, mobile application, therapist-guided intervention, university students, antidepressants, resilience, mindfulness, perceived stress, usual care, digital mental health
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adult, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review