Cited by 16Cancer survivorship and careCAR-T cell therapy researchMental Health Treatment and Access

Prevalence and factors associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms among patients hospitalized with hematological malignancies after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy: A cross-sectional study

Dai, Hongyuan, Xu, Shuya, Han, Jing, Li, Zhenyu, Cao, Jiang, Hu, Tingyu, Li, Hongxia, Wei, Jing +3 more·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background We conducted a survey to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms among patients hospitalized with hematological malignancies after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Methods In total, 130 eligible patients completed the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale at week 4 after CAR-T cell infusion. We collected sociodemographic information during the same period. We studied factors associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms using logistic regression analysis. Results The prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms at week 4 after infusion were 13.8% and 40.0%, respectively. A cutoff value of 50 or above indicates significantly anxiety and depressive symptoms. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that high school education and above (OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.06-0.78) and middle age (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.03-0.90) were associated with lower risk of anxiety symptoms, and increased odds of depressive symptoms was associated with old age (OR = 11.39, 95% CI = 2.50-51.88), non-manual occupations before illness (OR = 3.72, 95% CI = 1.20-11.58), and higher healthcare expenditure (OR = 3.93, 95% CI = 1.50-10.33), while lower risk of depressive symptoms was associated with rural household location (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.08-0.76) and being cared for by spouse (OR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.02-0.63). Conclusions Patients receiving CAR-T therapy with lower education background, old ages, urban house…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.041

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dai, H., Xu, S., Han, J., Li, Z., Cao, J., Hu, T., Li, H., Wei, J., Dou, X., Zhou, F., & Zheng, J.
Affiliations
Xuzhou Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Fang
  • Zheng, Junnian
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
286
Pages
33-39
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3130449359
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, CAR T-cell therapy, hematologic malignancies, risk factors, educational attainment, age, occupation, health care expenditure, rural residence, spousal caregiving, psychological support
MeSH terms
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Humans, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, T-Lymphocytes, Prevalence, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Hematologic Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review