Cited by 34LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The impact of mindfulness on self-stigma and affective symptoms among sexual minorities

Chan, Kevin Ka Shing, Leung, Donald Chi Kin·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Research shows that mindfulness may enable sexual minorities to resist stigma and reduce distress. Less is known, however, about the underlying processes. The present study addressed this gap in the literature by examining how mindfulness would mitigate self-stigma and, in turn, alleviate affective symptoms among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals. Methods A total of 401 LGB individuals from Hong Kong, China, provided cross-sectional questionnaire data on mindfulness, positive reappraisal, negative rumination, self-stigma content, self-stigma process, disempowerment, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms. Structural equation modeling and Bootstrap analyses were conducted to analyze the relations among the variables. Results Structural equation modeling showed that mindfulness was associated with increased positive reappraisal and reduced negative rumination, which were, in turn, associated with lower levels of self-stigma content and process, respectively. Moreover, lower levels of self-stigma content and process were associated with a reduced sense of disempowerment, which was, in turn, associated with lower levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms. Bootstrap analyses further demonstrated that mindfulness had significant indirect effects on depressive and anxiety symptoms via positive reappraisal, self-stigma content, and disempowerment and via negative rumination, self-stigma process, and disempowerment. Conclusions Theoretically, this study reveal…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.057

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing evidence-based techniques adapted for use with gender minority populations hold different efficacies dependent on cultural considerations.

    “Existing, evidence-based techniques which have been adapted for use with gender minority populations are shown to hold different efficacies dependent on cultural considerations, and researchers have long called for culturally-specific interventions for a variety of populations (Chan & Leung, Citation2021; Meyer & Zane, Citation2013; Sue & Sue, Citation1999).”

    From Proposed Self-as-Context Interventions for Gender Minority Clients (2025) · cites this paper as Chan & Leung, 2021

  • Researchers have long called for culturally-specific interventions for a variety of populations.

    “Existing, evidence-based techniques which have been adapted for use with gender minority populations are shown to hold different efficacies dependent on cultural considerations, and researchers have long called for culturally-specific interventions for a variety of populations (Chan & Leung, Citation2021; Meyer & Zane, Citation2013; Sue & Sue, Citation1999).”

    From Proposed Self-as-Context Interventions for Gender Minority Clients (2025) · cites this paper as Chan & Leung, 2021

  • Mindfulness has been shown to improve mental health outcomes for a variety of populations, including those facing systemic stigma.

    “Research shows that mindfulness, the process of paying attention with awareness and attentiveness to the immediate experience in a nonjudgmental way,12,13 improves mental health outcomes for a variety of populations, including those facing systemic stigma.14–20”
  • Through mindfulness-based interventions, changes can occur regarding emotion regulation, attention control, acceptance, self-referential processing, positive reappraisal, and self-awareness, which may interrupt the pathway from stigma and stress to mental illness.

    “Through mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), changes can occur regarding emotion regulation, attention control, acceptance, self-referential processing, positive reappraisal, and self-awareness, which may interrupt the pathway from stigma and stress to mental illness.16,20–22”
  • A bidirectional relationship exists between shame and mindfulness.

    “It is also important to note the bidirectional relationship that exists between shame and mindfulness”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 66 · Cited by 34

Authors
Chan, K. K. S., & Leung, D. C. K.
Affiliations
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chan, Kevin Ka Shing
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
286
Pages
213-219
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134671763
Cited by
34
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
The Education University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mindfulness, self-stigma, sexual minorities, lesbian, gay, and bisexual people, affective symptoms, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, positive reappraisal, negative rumination, disempowerment, stigma resistance, emotional distress
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Affective Symptoms, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review