Functional connectivity evidence for state-independent executive function deficits in patients with major depressive disorder
Abstract
Background Persistent neurocognitive deficits are often associated with poor outcomes of major depressive disorder (MDD). Executive dysfunction is the most common cognitive deficit in MDD. However, it remains unclear which subcomponent of executive dysfunction is state-independent with distinct neural substrates. Methods A comprehensive neurocognitive test battery was used to assess four subcomponents of executive function (working memory, inhibition, shifting, and verbal fluency) in 95 MDD patients and 111 matched healthy controls (HCs). After 6 months of paroxetine treatment, 56 patients achieved clinical remission (rMDD) and completed the second-time neurocognitive test. Network-based statistics analysis was utilized to explore the changes in functional connectivity (FC). Results Compared with the HCs, all the four subcomponents of MDD patients were significantly impaired. After treatment, there was a significant improvement in working memory, inhibition, and verbal fluency in the rMDD group. And shifting and verbal fluency of the rMDD group remained impaired compared with the HCs. Fifteen functional connections were interrupted in the MDD group, and 11 connections remained in a disrupted state after treatment. Importantly, verbal fluency was negatively correlated with the disrupted FC between the right dorsal prefrontal cortex and the left inferior parietal lobule in patients with MDD and remitted MDD. Limitations The correlation analysis of the association between cognit…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MDD results in cognitive impairments.
“Although primarily manifested as depression, MDD also results in cognitive impairments.131,132”
From Epigenetic regulation in major depression and other stress-related disorders: molecular mechanisms, clinical relevance and therapeutic potential (2023) · cites this paper as [132]
Cites
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798 · see citing works
Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks
Zalesky, A., Fornito, A., & Bullmore, E. T. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.041 · Cited by 2,750 · see citing works
Snyder, H. R. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028727 · Cited by 1,667 · see citing works
Cognitive impairment in euthymic major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis
Bora, E., Harrison, B. J., Yücel, M., & Pantelis, C. (2013) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291712002085 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Conradi, H. J., Ormel, J., & de Jonge, P. (2011) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291710001911 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Buckman, J. E. J., Underwood, A., Clarke, K., Saunders, R., Hollon, S. D., Fearon, P., & Pilling, S. (2018) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.005 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Ahern, E., & Semkovska, M. (2017) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000319 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Executive dysfunction predicts nonresponse to fluoxetine in major depression
Dunkin, J. J., Leuchter, A. F., Cook, I. A., Kasl-Godley, J. E., Abrams, M., & Rosenberg-Thompson, S. (2000) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00157-3 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders
Kessing, L. V., & Andersen, P. K. (2017) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.12667 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Reineberg, A. E., & Banich, M. T. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23219 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yuan, M., Yang, B., Rothschild, G., Mann, J. J., Sanford, L. D., Tang, X., Huang, C., Wang, C., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01519-z · Cited by 246 · see citing works
“131,132 Neuronal plasticity and cognitive function are associated with transcriptional changes regulated by HDAC-mediated epigenetic modi fi cation.”
Background
- Authors
- Liu, J., Ju, Y., Fan, Y., Liu, B., Zeng, L.-L., Wang, M., Dong, Q., Lu, X., Sun, J., Zhang, L., Guo, H., Zhao, F., Li, W., Zhang, L., Li, Z., Liao, M., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Hu, D., & Li, L.
- Affiliations
- Central South University (CN)
- National University of Defense Technology (CN)
- Zhumadian Central Hospital (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Hu, Dewen
- Li, Lingjiang
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 291
- Pages
- 76-82
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3164902379
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Fok Ying Tung Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, executive function, functional connectivity, verbal fluency, working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, remission, dorsal prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal lobule, network-based statistics
- MeSH terms
- Cognition Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Executive Function, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review