Cited by 49Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Combining selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and cognitive behavioral therapy in youth with depression and anxiety

Open access
Strawn, Jeffrey R., Mills, Jeffrey A., Suresh, Vikram, Peris, Tara S., Walkup, John T., Croarkin, Paul E.·2022·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Treatment studies of children and adolescents with internalizing disorders suggest that the combination of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) consistently produces greater improvement than either treatment alone. We sought to determine how response to combined treatment varies across disorders (anxiety versus depression), and by specific patient characteristics. Methods Three large National Institutes of Health-funded trials of children and adolescents with major depression (n = 2) and anxiety disorders (n = 1) were evaluated, each comparing CBT + SSRI to SSRI only, Bayesian Hierarchical Models (BHMs) were used, for endpoint response, time course of response and predictors of response in participants who received SSRI or SSRI+CBT. Results SSRI+CBT significantly decreased symptoms by week 4 (p<0.001) across disorders. This improvement continued at week 8 and 12 (p<0.001); however, the additive benefit of CBT over SSRI monotherapy was not statistically significant until week 12 (p<0.001). The fastest response to SSRI+CBT was for patients who were younger, with milder baseline anxiety/depression symptoms and depressive disorders. The slowest response for SSRI+CBT was for boys, adolescents, minoritized children, those with severe symptoms and externalizing disorders. Limitations Limitations included inconsistent moderators, variation in the number of observations over time and a lack of genetic or pharmacokinetic variables related to SSRI exposure across studies. Conclusions The superiority of SSRI+CBT for youth with depression and anxiety is further supported. For purposes of rapid and greater relief, combination treatment is the superior approach across anxiety and depression and is robust to a range of participant characteristics. However, the added value of CBT (with an SSRI) occurs late in treatment. These findings represent a step towards understanding heterogeneity of treatment response and raise the possibility that interventions could be better tailored or adapted based on patient characteristics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.047

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining SSRIs with cognitive-behavioral therapy yields better outcomes than medication alone, particularly in reducing symptom severity and preventing relapse.

    “Studies indicate that combining SSRIs with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) yields better outcomes than medication alone, particularly in reducing symptom severity and preventing relapse (Strawn et al.) A growing body of research supports the combination of SSRIs and CBT as the most effective treatment for both depression and anxiety in youth [117].”

    From The Impact of Social Media &amp; Technology on Child and Adolescent Mental Health (2025) · cites this paper as [117]

    The Results (Time course of CBT+SSRI benefit relative to SSRI benefit; page unavailable) report greater symptom improvement with combined treatment than with SSRI alone by week 12. The paper examines treatment response through week 12, but the passages found do not support the claim that the combination prevents relapse. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The benefits of CBT become more pronounced over time, with significant symptom reduction by the 12-week mark of treatment.

    “The benefits of CBT become more pronounced over time, with studies showing significant symptom reduction by the 12-week mark of treatment [117].”

    From The Impact of Social Media &amp; Technology on Child and Adolescent Mental Health (2025) · cites this paper as [117]

    The Results (‘Time course of CBT+SSRI benefit relative to SSRI benefit’; page not provided) show that the added benefit of CBT became statistically significant at week 12, while symptoms in the combined-treatment group had already decreased significantly by week 4. The claim omits that this finding concerns CBT added to an SSRI in youth with depression or anxiety, not CBT treatment on its own. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Armstrong K, Putt M, Halbert CH, Grande D, Schwartz JS, Liao K, Marcus N, Demeter MB, Shea JA, 2013. Prior experiences of racial discrimination and racial differences in health care system distrust. Med. Care doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827310a1 PMC3552105 23222499 · DOI
  2. Asarnow JR, Emslie G, Clarke G, Wagner KD, Spirito A, Vitiello B, Iyengar S, Shamseddeen W, Ritz L, Mccracken J, Strober M, Suddath R, Leonard H, Porta G, Keller M, Brent D, 2009. Treatment of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-resistant depression in adolescents: predictors and moderators of treatment response. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 48, 330– 9. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181977476 19182688 PMC2754157 · DOI
  3. Boulware LE, Cooper LA, Ratner LE, LaVeist TA, Powe NR, 2003. Race and trust in the health care system. Public Health Rep. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50262-5 PMC1497554 12815085 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Brent DA, Emslie GJ, Clarke GN, Asarnow J, Spirito A, Ritz L, Vitiello B, Iyengar S, Birmaher B, Ryan ND, Zelazny J, Onorato M, Kennard B, Mayes TL, DeBar LL, McCracken JT, Strober M, Suddath R, Leonard H, Porta G, Keller MB, 2009. Predictors of spontaneous and systematically assessed suicidal adverse events in the treatment of SSRI-resistant depression in adolescents (TORDIA) study. Am. J. Psychiatry 166, 418– 426. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08070976 19223438 PMC3593721 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Brent D, Emslie G, Clarke G, Wagner KD, Asarnow JR, Keller M, Vitiello B, Ritz L, Iyengar S, Abebe K, Birmaher B, Ryan N, Kennard B, Hughes C, DeBar L, McCracken J, Strober M, Suddath R, Spirito A, Leonard H, Melhem N, Porta G, Onorato M, Zelazny J, 2008a. Switching to another SSRI or to venlafaxine with or without cognitive behavioral therapy for adolescents with SSRI-resistant depression: The TORDIA randomized controlled trial. JAMA - J. Am. Med. Assoc 299, 901– 913. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.8.901 PMC2277341 18314433 · DOI
  6. Brent D, Emslie G, Clarke G, Wagner KD, Asarnow JR, Keller M, Vitiello B, Ritz L, Iyengar S, Abebe K, Birmaher B, Ryan N, Kennard B, Hughes C, DeBar L, McCracken J, Strober M, Suddath R, Spirito A, Leonard H, Melhem N, Porta G, Onorato M, Zelazny J, 2008b. Switching to another SSRI or to venlafaxine with or without cognitive behavioral therapy for adolescents with SSRI-resistant depression: the TORDIA randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299, 901– 13. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.8.901 18314433 PMC2277341 · DOI
  7. Cummings JR, Ji X, Lally C, Druss BG, 2019. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Minimally Adequate Depression Care Among Medicaid-Enrolled Youth. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.04.025 PMC8051617 30577928 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Curry J, Rohde P, Simons A, Silva S, Vitiello B, Kratochvil C, Reinecke M, Feeny N, Wells K, Pathak S, Weller E, Rosenberg D, Kennard B, Robins M, Ginsburg G, March J, 2006. Predictors and moderators of acute outcome in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS). J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000240838.78984.e2 17135988 · DOI
  9. D.J. S, J.M. P, G.J. E, G.N. C, K.D. W, B. V, M.B. K, B. B, J.R. A, N.D. R, J.T. M, M.J. S, S. I, G. P, 2011. Antidepressant exposure as a predictor of clinical outcomes in the Treatment of Resistant Depression in Adolescents (TORDIA) study. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol PMC3603695 21192150
  10. Davey CG, Chanen AM, Hetrick SE, Cotton SM, Ratheesh A, Amminger GP, Koutsogiannis J, Phelan M, Mullen E, Harrison BJ, Rice S, Parker AG, Dean OM, Weller A, Kerr M, Quinn AL, Catania L, Kazantzis N, McGorry PD, Berk M, 2019. The addition of fluoxetine to cognitive behavioural therapy for youth depression (YoDA-C): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trial. The Lancet Psychiatry. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30215-9 31371212 · DOI
  11. Emslie GJ, Heiligenstein JH, Wagner KD, Hoog SL, Ernest DE, Brown E, Nilsson M, Jacobson JG, 2002. Fluoxetine for acute treatment of depression in children and adolescents: a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 41, 1205– 1215. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200210000-00010 12364842 · DOI
  12. Ge H, Xu K, Ghahramani Z, 2018. Turing: A Language for Flexible Probabilistic Inference. Proc. Twenty-First Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Stat 84, 1682– 1690.
  13. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB, 2004. Bayesian Data Analysis, Chapman Texts in Statistical Science Series, doi: 10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2 · DOI
  14. Gunlicks-Stoessel M, Mufson L, Bernstein G, Westervelt A, Reigstad K, Klimes-Dougan B, Cullen K, Murray A, Vock D, 2019. Critical Decision Points for Augmenting Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depressed Adolescents: A Pilot Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.06.032 PMC7549148 30577943 · DOI
  15. Kennard BD, Clarke GN, Weersing VR, Asarnow JR, Shamseddeen W, Porta G, Berk M, Hughes JL, Spirito A, Emslie GJ, Keller MB, Wagner KD, Brent DA, 2009. Effective Components of TORDIA Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Adolescent Depression: Preliminary Findings. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol doi: 10.1037/a0017411 PMC3705725 19968380 · DOI
  16. Kruschke JK, 2014. Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan, second edition, Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan, Second Edition. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-405888-0.09999-2 · DOI
  17. March J, Silva S, Curry J, Wells K, Fairbank J, Burns B, Domino M, Vitiello B, Severe J, Riedal K, Goldman M, Feeny N, Findling R, Stull S, Baab S, Weller EB, Robbins M, Weller RA, Jessani N, Waslick B, Sweeney M, Dublin R, Walkup J, Ginsburg G, Kastelic E, Koo H, Kratochvil C, May D, LaGrone R, Vaughan B, Albano AM, Hirsch GS, Podniesinki E, Chu A, Reincecke M, Leventhal B, Rogers G, Jacobs R, Pathak S, Wells J, Lavanier SA, Danielyan A, Rohde P, Simons A, Grimm J, Frank S, Emslie G, Kennard B, Hughes C, Mayes TL, Rosenberg D, Benazon N, Butkus M, Bartoi M, 2009. The Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS): outcomes over 1 year of naturalistic follow-up. Am. J. Psychiatry 166, 1141– 9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08111620 19723787 · DOI
  18. McGlothlin AE, Viele K, 2018. Bayesian Hierarchical Models. JAMA - J. Am. Med. Assoc doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.17977 30535206 · DOI
  19. Mills Jeffrey A; Strawn JR, 2019. Probabilistic Biostatistics with Julia, in: JuliaCon Proceedings, pp. 1– 6.
  20. Schleider JL, Dobias M, Fassler J, Shroff A, Pati S, 2020. Promoting Treatment Access Following Pediatric Primary Care Depression Screening: Randomized Trial of Web-Based, Single-Session Interventions for Parents and Youths. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 59, 770– 773. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.01.025 32666919 · DOI
  21. Strawn JR, Mills JA, Sauley BA, Welge JA, 2018. The Impact of Antidepressant Dose and Class on Treatment Response in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Meta-Analysis. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 57, 235– 244.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.01.015 29588049 PMC5877120 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Strawn JR, Poweleit EA, Ramsey LB, 2019. CYP2C19-Guided Escitalopram and Sertraline Dosing in Pediatric Patients: A Pharmacokinetic Modeling Study. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol doi: 10.1089/cap.2018.0160 PMC6585169 30817183 · DOI
  23. Suresh V, Mills JA, Croarkin PE, Strawn JR, 2020. What next? A Bayesian hierarchical modeling re-examination of treatments for adolescents with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-resistant depression. Depress. Anxiety doi: 10.1002/da.23064 PMC7595266 32579280 · DOI
  24. Walkup JT, Friedland SJ, Peris TS, Strawn JR, 2021. Dysregulation, Catastrophic Reactions, and the Anxiety Disorders. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2020.10.011 33743949 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strawn, J. R., Mills, J. A., Suresh, V., Peris, T. S., Walkup, J. T., & Croarkin, P. E.
Affiliations
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Strawn, Jeffrey R.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
298
Issue
Pt A
Pages
292-300
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3208333533
Cited by
49
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD098757, R01HD099775)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, cognitive behavioral therapy, combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, childhood depression, adolescent anxiety disorders, internalizing disorders, predictors of treatment response, Bayesian hierarchical model, treatment moderators, externalizing disorders, minority children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Bayes Theorem, Child, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Male, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review