Cited by 155Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

The lethality of suicide methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Cai, Ziyi, Junus, Alvin, Chang, Qingsong, Yip, Paul S.F.·2022·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background The use of suicide methods largely determines the outcome of suicide acts. However, no existing meta-analysis has assessed the case fatality rates (CFRs) by different suicide methods. The current study aimed to fill this gap. Methods We searched Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest and Embase for studies reporting method-specific CFRs in suicide, published from inception to 31 December 2020. A random-effect model meta-analysis was applied to compute pooled estimates. Results Of 10,708 studies screened, 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the suicide acts that resulted in death or hospitalization, firearms were found to be the most lethal method (CFR:89.7%), followed by hanging/suffocation (84.5%), drowning (80.4%), gas poisoning (56.6%), jumping (46.7%), drug/liquid poisoning (8.0%) and cutting (4.0%). The rank of the lethality for different methods remained relatively stable across study setting, sex and age group. Method-specific CFRs for males and females were similar for most suicide methods, while method-CFRs were specifically higher in older adults. Conclusions This study is the first meta-analysis that provides significant evidence for the wide variation of the lethality of suicide methods. Restricting highly lethal methods based on local context is vital in suicide prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.054

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 90% of firearm suicide attempts result in death.

    “First, many patients with firearm injuries die at the scene, especially those who used a firearm to attempt suicide, 90% of which result in death [22].”

    From Firearm injuries in Missouri (2023) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Many patients with firearm injuries die at the scene, especially those who used a firearm to attempt suicide.

    “First, many patients with firearm injuries die at the scene, especially those who used a firearm to attempt suicide, 90% of which result in death [22].”

    From Firearm injuries in Missouri (2023) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, Z., Junus, A., Chang, Q., & Yip, P. S. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Jockey Club (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Chang, Qingsong
  • Yip, Paul S.F.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
300
Pages
121-129
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200170086
Cited by
155
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 7
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • The University of Hong Kong
  • Xiamen University
  • National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (21CSH057)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
suicide methods, case fatality rate, firearms, drowning, gas poisoning, drug poisoning, suicide prevention, sex differences, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Drowning, Female, Firearms, Gas Poisoning, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review