Emotional working memory training improves cognitive inhibitory abilities in individuals with borderline personality trait: A randomized parallel-group trial
Abstract
Background Cognitive inhibition impairment is one of the causes of impulsive behaviors in individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD). This study aimed to investigate the effect of emotional working memory training (EWMT) on cognitive inhibition in individuals with a clinically significant borderline personality trait. Methods In a randomized, parallel-group trial, 40 individuals with borderline personality trait, were selected out of 1000 screened individuals and were randomly assigned to the experimental (N = 20) and waiting-list control (N = 20) groups based on the score on the Borderline Personality Scale and the follow-up Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders. The experimental group underwent 10 sessions of EWMT and the control group did not receive any intervention (waiting list). Participants completed the Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) and Go/No-Go task Before and after the intervention. Results EWMT significantly reduced reaction time of incongruent trials in the SCWT and commission errors in the Go/No-Go task after the intervention only in the experimental group. Furthermore, the interference score in SCWT and commission error rate at the post-intervention time were significantly lower for the experimental vs the waitlist group. Limitations The single-blind design and absence of follow-up measures. Conclusions EWMT can improve cognitive inhibition in individuals with borderline personality trait and could be used for therapeutic purposes of impulsivity behavior in BPD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Working memory updating training, working memory maintenance training, and dual n-back training produced superior improvements on one of two inhibition tests relative to passive controls in healthy children and adults with borderline personality traits (but not healthy adults).
“A similar pattern has also been found in training studies of healthy children as well as adults with borderline personality traits (but not healthy adults) – in each case, working memory updating training, working memory maintenance (short-term memory) training, and dual n-back training produced superior improvements on one of two inhibition tests relative to passive controls (56–58; cf. 59, 60).”
From Working memory and inhibitory control deficits in children with ADHD: an experimental evaluation of competing model predictions (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Cites
Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review
Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004 · Cited by 6,686 · see citing works
Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review.
Moran, T. P. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000051 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Exploratory randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design
Cunningham, J. A., Kypri, K., & McCambridge, J. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-150 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Lobbestael, J., Arntz, A., & Bernstein, D. P. (2010) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2010.24.3.285 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Schweizer, S., Hampshire, A., & Dalgleish, T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024372 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Social cognition in borderline personality disorder
Roepke, S., Vater, A., Preißler, S., Heekeren, H. R., & Dziobek, I. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00195 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Salehinejad, M. A., Wischnewski, M., Nejati, V., Vicario, C. M., & Nitsche, M. A. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215095 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationThe effect of waiting: a meta-analysis of wait-list control groups in trials for tinnitus distress
Hesser, H., Weise, C., Rief, W., & Andersson, G. (2011) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.12.006 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Rawlings, D., Claridge, G., & Freeman, J. L. (2001) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00146-x · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Nejati, V., Salehinejad, M. A., & Sabayee, A. (2018) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-017-0837-2 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationMolavi, P., Nadermohammadi, M., Salvat Ghojehbeiglou, H., Vicario, C. M., Nitsche, M. A., & Salehinejad, M. A. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02887-4 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kofler, M. J., Groves, N. B., Chan, E. S. M., Marsh, C. L., Cole, A. M., Gaye, F., Cibrian, E., Tatsuki, M. O., & Singh, L. J. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1277583 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Basharpoor, S., Zakibakhsh Mohammadi, N., Heidari, F., Azarkolah, A., Vicario, C. M., & Salehinejad, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Mohaghegh Ardabili (IR)
- Imam Khomeini Hospital (IR)
- University of Messina (IT)
- Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Basharpoor, Sajjad
- Salehinejad, Mohammad Ali
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 319
- Pages
- 181-188
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4296690331
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- cognitive inhibition, impulsivity, Stroop task, go/no-go task, commission errors, reaction time, cognitive training
- MeSH terms
- Borderline Personality Disorder, Cognition, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Personality, Single-Blind Method
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review