Cited by 7Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Emotional working memory training improves cognitive inhibitory abilities in individuals with borderline personality trait: A randomized parallel-group trial

Basharpoor, Sajjad, Zakibakhsh Mohammadi, Nasim, Heidari, Fazeleh, Azarkolah, Anita, Vicario, Carmelo M., Salehinejad, Mohammad Ali·2022·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Cognitive inhibition impairment is one of the causes of impulsive behaviors in individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD). This study aimed to investigate the effect of emotional working memory training (EWMT) on cognitive inhibition in individuals with a clinically significant borderline personality trait. Methods In a randomized, parallel-group trial, 40 individuals with borderline personality trait, were selected out of 1000 screened individuals and were randomly assigned to the experimental (N = 20) and waiting-list control (N = 20) groups based on the score on the Borderline Personality Scale and the follow-up Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders. The experimental group underwent 10 sessions of EWMT and the control group did not receive any intervention (waiting list). Participants completed the Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) and Go/No-Go task Before and after the intervention. Results EWMT significantly reduced reaction time of incongruent trials in the SCWT and commission errors in the Go/No-Go task after the intervention only in the experimental group. Furthermore, the interference score in SCWT and commission error rate at the post-intervention time were significantly lower for the experimental vs the waitlist group. Limitations The single-blind design and absence of follow-up measures. Conclusions EWMT can improve cognitive inhibition in individuals with borderline personality trait and could be used for therapeutic purposes of impulsivity behavior in BPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.089

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Working memory updating training, working memory maintenance training, and dual n-back training produced superior improvements on one of two inhibition tests relative to passive controls in healthy children and adults with borderline personality traits (but not healthy adults).

    “A similar pattern has also been found in training studies of healthy children as well as adults with borderline personality traits (but not healthy adults) – in each case, working memory updating training, working memory maintenance (short-term memory) training, and dual n-back training produced superior improvements on one of two inhibition tests relative to passive controls (56–58; cf. 59, 60).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basharpoor, S., Zakibakhsh Mohammadi, N., Heidari, F., Azarkolah, A., Vicario, C. M., & Salehinejad, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Mohaghegh Ardabili (IR)
  • Imam Khomeini Hospital (IR)
  • University of Messina (IT)
  • Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Basharpoor, Sajjad
  • Salehinejad, Mohammad Ali
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
319
Pages
181-188
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296690331
Cited by
7
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
cognitive inhibition, impulsivity, Stroop task, go/no-go task, commission errors, reaction time, cognitive training
MeSH terms
Borderline Personality Disorder, Cognition, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Personality, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review