Cited by 1Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The portable transcranial electrical stimulation and internet-based behavioral therapy for major depression study (PSYLECT): results of the maintenance phase

Aparicio, Luana V.M., Luethi, Matthias S., Borrione, Lucas, Moran, Natasha K.S., Cavendish, Beatriz A., Silva, Valquiria A., Valiengo, Leandro, Goerigk, Stephan +4 more·2026·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has demonstrated antidepressant efficacy, but optimal strategies for long-term maintenance remain unexplored. While clinic-based maintenance tDCS poses adherence and logistical challenges, home-based protocols may improve accessibility and prevent attrition.Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of home-based tDCS for relapse prevention in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) during the maintenance phase of the PSYLECT trial.Methods Following the randomized controlled trial (Phase I, n = 210) and open-label crossover (Phase II), responders (≥50 % improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores) were enrolled in Phase III: a 6-month, open-label continuation protocol involving twice-weekly home-based tDCS sessions (2 mA, 30 min, F3-F4 montage) with or without digital behavioral therapy (BT). The primary outcome was time to relapse, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Cox regression assessed predictors of relapse.Results Seventy-one patients (mean age 37.9 ± 9.0 years; 89 % female) were included in Phase III. At 24 weeks, 75 % (95 % CI, 64.2-82.8) remained without relapse or discontinuation, while survival without relapse alone was 82 %. Six participants (8.5 %) relapsed, and 11 (15.5 %) discontinued. No significant predictors of relapse were identified, nor did BT significantly enhance survivability. Adverse events were predominantly mild; most common were transient scalp itching (21 %) and headaches (18 %), while 40 % of participants reported no adverse events by month 6.Conclusion Home-based maintenance tDCS was safe, feasible, and led to clinically meaningful relapse prevention comparable to clinic-based protocols. Its advantages in terms of scalability, cost-effectiveness and accessibility support its potential as a maintenance strategy for MDD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2025.120548

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 13 of the 20 studies using scales use the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, with varied score criteria: 8, 12, 14, 16, 18, and up to 20.

    “13 of the 20 use the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, although the score they establish as a criterion is very varied, with some considering a score of 8 points (4) as sufficient for a relapse, others of 12 (20), 14 (13, 14, 44), 16 (17, 18) 18 (47, 49) and up to 20 (9).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aparicio, L. V. M., Luethi, M. S., Borrione, L., Moran, N. K. S., Cavendish, B. A., Silva, V. A., Valiengo, L., Goerigk, S., Padberg, F., Razza, L. B., Vidal, K. S. M., & Brunoni, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-02
Volume
394
Issue
Pt A
Pages
120548
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415531779
Cited by
1
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation (2021/10574-0, 2019/06009-6)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, home-based tDCS, major depressive disorder, relapse prevention, maintenance therapy, digital cognitive behavioral therapy, medication adherence, treatment safety, predictors of relapse
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Combined Modality Therapy, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Internet, Secondary Prevention, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review