Cited by 95Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Food Type, Food Preparation, and Competitive Food Purchases Impact School Lunch Plate Waste by Sixth-Grade Students

Marlette, Martha A., Templeton, Susan B., Panemangalore, Myna·2005·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

Because plate waste reduces nutritional benefits of school lunches, the objective of this study was to determine the factors that influence waste. Lunches of 743 sixth graders in three middle schools were photographed after students made food selections and after eating. Sample items were purchased to determine initial portion weights. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (Base 10.0, 1995, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. Preparation method influenced acceptance rates and plate waste: Whole apples had lower acceptance (23%) and greater waste (62%) compared with applesauce (37% acceptance, 23% waste). Mashed potatoes and heated fries had similar acceptance (approximately 69%), but mashed potatoes were wasted less (19% vs 33%, respectively). Students who purchased competitive food items with lunch (n = 250) had significantly greater waste of fruits (52% vs 36%, respectively, P = .0001), grain products (26% vs 14%, respectively, P = .009), meats (25% vs 16%, respectively, P = .015), and mixed dishes (30% vs 18%, respectively, P = .0001). Changing preparation methods and limiting availability of competitive food items may reduce plate waste.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jada.2005.08.033

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 95

Authors
Marlette, M. A., Templeton, S. B., & Panemangalore, M.
Affiliations
Kentucky State University (US)
Corresponding author
Panemangalore, Myna
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
105
Issue
11
Pages
1779-1782
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043085229
Cited by
95
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
plate waste, school meals, food preparation methods, food acceptance, sixth grade students, junior high school students, food type, portion size, applesauce, mashed potatoes, fruit waste, meat waste
MeSH terms
Animals, Child, Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Cooking, Diet Surveys, Female, Food, Food Preferences, Food Services, Fruit, Humans, Male, Menu Planning, Milk, Nutritional Requirements, Nutritive Value, Photography, Schools, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review