Cited by 83Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

‘It's just so much waste.’ A qualitative investigation of food waste in a universal free School Breakfast Program

Open access
Blondin, Stacy A, Djang, Holly Carmichael, Metayer, Nesly, Anzman-Frasca, Stephanie, Economos, Christina D·2015·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: To understand stakeholders’ perspectives on food waste in a universal free School Breakfast Program implementing a Breakfast in the Classroom model. Design: Semi-structured focus groups and interviews were conducted with school district stakeholders. Inductive methods were used to code resulting transcripts, from which themes were identified. The analysis provides a thematic analysis of stakeholders’ perspectives on food waste in the School Breakfast Program. Setting: Ten elementary schools in a large urban school district implementing a universal free Breakfast in the Classroom model of the US national School Breakfast Program. Subjects: Elementary-school students ( n 85), parents ( n 86), teachers ( n 44), cafeteria managers ( n 10) and school principals ( n 10). Results: Stakeholders perceived food waste as a problem and expressed concern regarding the amount of food wasted. Explanations reported for food waste included food-related (palatability and accessibility), child-related (taste preferences and satiation) and programme-related (duration, food service policies, and coordination) factors. Milk and fruit were perceived as foods particularly susceptible to waste. Several food waste mitigation strategies were identified by participants: saving food for later, actively encouraging children’s consumption, assisting children with foods during mealtime, increasing staff support, serving smaller portion sizes, and composting and donating uneaten food. Conclusions: Stakeholders recognized food waste as a problem, reported myriad contributing factors, and have considered and employed multiple and diverse mitigation strategies. Changes to the menu and/or implementation logistics, as well as efforts to use leftover food productively, may be possible strategies of reducing waste and improving the School Breakfast Program’s economic, environmental and nutritional impact.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Stakeholders in a large urban district implementing universal free Breakfast in the Classroom perceived food waste as a problem, especially for milk and fruit, and attributed it to food-, child-, and programme-related factors. They reported and suggested mitigation strategies spanning primary prevention, saving/reusing food, and composting or donating leftovers.

Key findings

  • Across 10 elementary schools, 235 unique voices participated: students (n 85), parents (n 86), teachers (n 44), cafeteria managers (n 10) and principals (n 10). Stakeholders generally described food waste negatively, using terms such as “terrible,” “a shame,” “daunting,” “wretched” and “ridiculous.”
  • Participants generally agreed waste per programme participant had decreased compared with cafeteria-based breakfast, but many noted total waste increased because participation increased. Milk and fruit were most frequently cited as wasted; one teacher estimated throwing away at least 15 of 21 milks daily, and another suggested more than half of cartons offered were discarded.
  • Explanations for waste fell into three themes: food-related (palatability, accessibility, perishability), child-related (taste preferences, satiation) and programme-related (duration, food service policies including reimbursement/offer versus serve/food safety, and coordination).
  • Mitigation strategies included saving food for later, encouraging children’s consumption, assisting children with foods, increasing staff support, serving smaller portion sizes, and composting or donating uneaten food.

Methods

  • Qualitative study in 10 demographically representative public elementary schools in a large urban US school district that had implemented a universal free Breakfast in the Classroom model for 3–6 months. Data included 29 focus groups (10 parent, 5 teacher, 14 student) and 20 interviews (10 cafeteria managers, 10 principals).
  • Semi-structured focus group and key informant interview guides covered morning routines, breakfast consumption, programme rollout/implementation, and opinions about Breakfast in the Classroom. Parent groups were offered in Spanish and English; five of ten parent groups were conducted in Spanish.
  • Audio recordings were transcribed, Spanish transcripts translated into English, and analyzed with NVivo 10 using inductive thematic analysis. Six trained analysts established inter-rater reliability with a senior analyst (≥80% agreement) on three randomly selected transcripts; themes were independently identified by two analysts and discrepancies resolved by discussion.

Limitations

  • Stated by the authors: the study relied on a non-random sample, limiting external validity; it occurred in a single large urban district, limiting generalizability to similar districts; schools had recently adopted Breakfast in the Classroom, so food waste may have been greater and more variable than after adjustment; and the analysis was embedded within a larger qualitative exploration of Breakfast in the Classroom, so more focused food-waste questions and probes could have captured greater complexity and allowed demographic comparisons.
  • Evident in the text: findings are stakeholder perceptions and reports, not objective plate-waste measurements; one Spanish-speaking focus group was not recorded due to recorder failure; and analyses were not stratified, so the paper reports no differences or patterns by school or focus group language.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980014002948

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 35 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Milk was perceived as a food particularly susceptible to waste.

    “Milk and fruit were perceived as foods particularly susceptible to waste.”
    • Also stated in: § Relative. · plain
      “With regard to quantity, the milk meal component was frequently referenced as contributing most substantially to overall food waste.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Fruit was perceived as a food particularly susceptible to waste.

    “Milk and fruit were perceived as foods particularly susceptible to waste.”
    • Also stated in: § Perishability. · plain
      “The perishability of fruit and its tendency to over-ripen were also noted in association with its disposal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Stakeholders have considered and employed multiple and diverse mitigation strategies.

    “Stakeholders in a large, urban school district implementing a universal free BIC model of the SBP recognized food waste as a problem, reported myriad contributing factors, and have considered and employed multiple and diverse mitigation strategies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    SBP policies, including reimbursement rules, OVS policy and food safety standards, influenced the quantity of food waste.

    “It was also apparent that SBP policies, including reimbursement rules, OVS policy and food safety standards, influenced the quantity of food waste.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Once milk is offered in the classroom, food safety standards require that it be disposed.
  • Findingown data

    The inaccessibility of fruit interacted with programme duration, motivating some teachers to cut up fruit out of concern for children's nutrient consumption, loss of instructional time and unease about food waste.

    “For example, the inaccessibility of fruit interacted with programme duration, motivating some teachers to cut up fruit out of concern for children's nutrient consumption, loss of instructional time and unease about food waste.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 30
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Stakeholders perceived food waste as a problem and expressed concern regarding the amount of food wasted.

    “Stakeholders perceived food waste as a problem and expressed concern regarding the amount of food wasted.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “Stakeholders recognized food waste as a problem, reported myriad contributing factors, and have considered and employed multiple and diverse mitigation strategies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Explanations reported for food waste included food-related (palatability and accessibility), child-related (taste preferences and satiation) and programme-related (duration, food service policies, and coordination) factors.

    “Explanations reported for food waste included food-related (palatability and accessibility), child-related (taste preferences and satiation) and programme-related (duration, food service policies, and coordination) factors.”
    • Also stated in: § Explanations for food waste · plain
      “The phenomenon of food waste was attributed to three explanatory factors: (i) food-related; (ii) child-related; and (iii) programme-related.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Several food waste mitigation strategies were identified by participants: saving food for later, actively encouraging children's consumption, assisting children with foods during mealtime, increasing staff support, serving smaller portion sizes, and composting and donating uneaten food.

    “Several food waste mitigation strategies were identified by participants: saving food for later, actively encouraging children's consumption, assisting children with foods during mealtime, increasing staff support, serving smaller portion sizes, and composting and donating uneaten food.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Three overarching themes were identified: participant perceptions and attitudes towards food waste; explanations for food waste; and strategies to mitigate food waste.

    “Three overarching themes were identified: (i) participant perceptions and attitudes towards food waste; (ii) explanations for food waste; and (iii) strategies to mitigate food waste.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Participants suggested serving smaller portion sizes, especially for younger students, as a mitigation strategy.

    “Other participants corroborated this suggestion, commenting on the quantity of food being too great, especially for younger students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Satiation was attributed to uniform portion sizes across K-5 grade levels, which may be inappropriately large for younger children, and to eating at home before school.

    “This physiological response was attributed to uniform portion sizes across K-5 grade levels, which may be inappropriately large for younger children, and to eating at home before school.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Programme-related explanations for food waste included meal duration, food service policies (including reimbursement and OVS rules), and coordination.

    “Logistical and structural characteristics of the programme discussed as contributors to food waste included meal duration, policies (including reimbursement and OVS rules) and coordination.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Increased participation rates resulted in overall increases in the total amount of waste.

    “others noted that increased participation rates resulted in overall increases in the total amount waste.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    While programme rules dictate the number of food items a child must select to qualify as a reimbursable meal, the student ultimately decides how much of each food item to consume, making individual taste preferences and appetite strong determinants of waste.

    “While programme rules dictate the number of food items a child must select to qualify as a reimbursable meal, the student ultimately decides how much of each food item to consume, making individual taste preferences and appetite strong determinants of waste”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The total amount of waste varied considerably by grade level and menu offerings.

    “Others recognized that the total amount of waste varied considerably by grade level and menu offerings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The possibility of diverting leftover food for productive uses was recognized.

    “Finally, the possibility of diverting leftover food for productive uses was recognized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although analyses were not stratified, no differences or patterns in responses by school or focus group language were apparent.

    “Although analyses were not stratified, no differences or patterns in responses by school or focus group language were apparent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Participants generally agreed that waste per programme participant had decreased in the BIC delivery model compared with the previous traditional model served in the cafeteria.

    “participants generally agreed that waste per programme participant had decreased.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Stakeholders mentioned that perishable and packaged foods were received in expired or deteriorated conditions on multiple occasions, and such foods provoked scepticism and mass disposal.

    “stakeholders mentioned both perishable and packaged foods received in expired or deteriorated conditions on multiple occasions.”
    • Also stated in: § Perishability. · plain
      “Foods in such conditions were cited as provoking participant scepticism and mass disposal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Teachers employed games and persuasion tactics to encourage students to consume food, but recognized limitations.

    “Teachers also commented on efforts to encourage students to consume food, employing games and persuasion tactics in their pursuits to prevent waste.”
    • Also stated in: § Satiation. · plain
      “However, other teachers recognized its limitations, as one remarked: 'They're not even drinking their milk, and I'm really pushing, you need some protein to start the day.'”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Milk waste was perceived as resulting from children's general distaste for milk, particularly plain milk after chocolate milk was no longer offered.

    “participants reported milk waste as subject to daily disposal, perceiving its waste as resulting from children's general distaste for it.”
    • Also stated in: § Child-related · hedged
      “Another cafeteria manager attributed students' rejection to a distaste for plain milk specifically: '… They only have white milk.… that's why I think some of the kids don't like to drink their milk, because it's just plainjust white milk and before, they had chocolate milk, and when they had chocolate milk, they were crazy about that milk.They love that milk.Yes.'”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In our study, milk waste was attributed to perishability and students' distaste for the beverage.

    “In our study, milk waste was attributed to perishability and students' distaste for the beverage.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compared with when breakfast was served in the cafeteria, stakeholders perceive waste per student to have decreased, despite general agreement that the total amount of waste had increased as a result of increased BIC SBP participation.

    “Our findings suggest that, compared with when breakfast was served in the cafeteria, stakeholders perceive waste per student to have decreased, despite general agreement that the total amount of waste had increased as a result of increased BIC SBP participation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fruit's perishability and inaccessibility were noted as consumption barriers.

    “While participants in our study reported that fruit was generally well liked, its perishability and inaccessibility were noted as consumption barriers and serving pre-packaged, cut fruit compromised acceptability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Previous research suggests that food waste in US public schools is substantial in magnitude and value.

    “Previous research suggests that food waste in US public schools is substantial in magnitude and value (8,16,17) .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [17]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    No studies have thoroughly investigated diverse stakeholders' perceptions of, attitudes towards or reactions to food waste in the SBP.

    “Yet no studies have thoroughly investigated diverse stakeholders' perceptions of, attitudes towards or reactions to food waste in the SBP.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a regional study in Milwaukee, WI, about half (52%) of selected food items were fully consumed and younger children disposed of greater quantities of food than older children.

    “In a regional study in Milwaukee, WI, the quantity of food waste in a universal free BIC model of the SBP was observed, revealing that about half (52 %) of selected food items were fully consumed and that younger children disposed of greater quantities of food than older children (31) .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    These studies provide evidence of food waste within the SBP, but neither explored stakeholders' perspectives about the waste.

    “These studies provide evidence of food waste within the SBP, but neither explored stakeholders' perspectives about the waste.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    All dialogue was recorded, with the exception of one Spanish-speaking focus group due to recorder failure.

    “All dialogue was recorded, with the exception of one Spanish-speaking focus group (due to recorder failure).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Tufts University Institutional Review Board and the school district's Committee for External Research Review Chair.

    “The study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Tufts University Institutional Review Board and by the school district's Committee for External Research Review Chair.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Research personnel summarized responses aloud to participants during each session and debriefed as a group afterwards to corroborate results.

    “Research personnel summarized responses aloud to participants during each session and debriefed as a group afterwards to corroborate results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Research staff were recruited and trained on study protocols prior to data collection in 2013.

    “Research staff were recruited and trained on study protocols prior to data collection in 2013.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Findings from the NSLP offer several potential strategies to reduce waste, including extending eating time, increasing the variety of offerings, serving lunch after recess, improving meal quality, allowing children to serve themselves and serving fruit in ready-to-eat forms.

    “Findings from the NSLP offer several potential strategies to reduce waste (8) : extending eating time (23) , increasing the variety of offerings (24,47) , serving lunch after recess (21,22) , improving meal quality (16) , allowing children to serve themselves (19,20) and serving fruit in ready-to-eat forms (25,48) .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [47] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Menu deviation could increase food waste if children are unexpectedly served less favourable items, or if they eat at home to safeguard against uncertainty and are consequently less hungry.

    “Therefore, menu deviation could increase food waste if children are unexpectedly served less favourable items, or if they eat at home to safeguard against uncertainty and are consequently less hungry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Notes and observations made during data collection were cross-referenced.

    “Notes and observations made during data collection were then cross-referenced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Explanations for food waste interact on multiple levels and, together with perceptions of food waste, inform mitigation efforts and ideas.

    “While parsed into distinct themes for the current analysis, it is evident that explanations for food waste interact on multiple levels and, together with perceptions of food waste, inform mitigation efforts and ideas (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Themes were independently identified by two analysts; results were compared and discrepancies discussed until mutual agreement was reached.

    “These themes were independently identified by two analysts; results were compared and discrepancies discussed until mutual agreement was reached.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Six trained analysts established inter-rater reliability with a senior analyst (≥80% agreement) on three randomly selected transcripts.

    “Six trained analysts then established inter-rater reliability with a senior analyst (≥80 % agreement) on three randomly selected transcripts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Instruments underwent further refinement following pilot testing with ChildObesity180 staff and children participating in the BIC SNP in Somerville, MA.

    “Instruments underwent further refinement following pilot testing with ChildObesity180 staff and children participating in the BIC SNP in Somerville, MA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because the district serves a high percentage of underserved children, findings have implications for those at greatest need.

    “Because the district serves a high percentage of underserved children, findings have implications for those at greatest need.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The majority of children in the USA fail to meet national guidelines for fruit consumption by considerable margins.

    “The majority of children in the USA fail to meet national guidelines for fruit consumption by considerable margins (57,59) .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [57] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [59] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The quality of fresh fruit may affect consumption by altering its palatability, and children may be especially sensitive to sensory characteristics of fruit.

    “The quality of fresh fruit may also affect consumption by altering its palatability and children may be especially sensitive to sensory characteristics of fruit (64) .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Offering non-dairy milks may increase acceptability.

    “With more than half of US children expected to be of Hispanic, Black or Asian decent by 2019 (68) , populations at increased risk for lactose malabsorption and intolerance (69)(70)(71) , offering non-dairy milks may increase acceptability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Inclusion of English-and Spanish-speaking parents expands the generalizability of findings.

    “Furthermore, inclusion of English-and Spanish-speaking parents expands the generalizability of findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Although efforts were made to achieve district representativeness, the study relied upon a non-random sample, which may limit its external validity.

    “First, although efforts were made to achieve district representativeness, the study relied upon a non-random sample, which may limit its external validity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Even within the SBP, each delivery model, further differentiated by cost structure, faces unique waste challenges.

    “Even within the SBP, each delivery model, further differentiated by cost structure, faces unique waste challenges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Each SBP delivery model, further differentiated by cost structure, faces unique waste challenges.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Tufts University Institutional Review Board and by the school district's Committee for External Research Review Chair.

    “The study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Tufts University Institutional Review Board and by the school district's Committee for External Research Review Chair.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Since the study schools had recently adopted the BIC model, food waste may have been greater and more variable than might be expected following adjustment.

    “Second, since the study schools had recently adopted the BIC model, food waste may have been greater and more variable than might be expected following adjustment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Since the present study took place in a single district implementing a universal free BIC model, results may not generalize to other BIC models and/or to other SBP programmes.

    “Since the present study took place in a single district implementing a universal free BIC model, results may not generalize to other BIC models and/or to other SBP programmes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Increasing the variety of produce offered to students within a meal may increase fruit consumption and reduce waste by increasing choice.

    “Previous findings demonstrate that increasing the variety of produce offered to students within a meal may increase fruit consumption and reduce waste by increasing choice (8,24,(60)(61)(62)(63) .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 8,24,(60)(61)(62)(63)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The single other breakfast-specific plate waste study observationally estimated waste in a summer breakfast programme; milk and fruit were wasted in the highest proportions at 38% and 31%, respectively.

    “The single other breakfast-specific plate waste study observationally estimated waste in a summer breakfast programme; milk and fruit were wasted in the highest proportions at 38 % and 31 %, respectively (50) .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Nutrition standards limiting fat content may have had the unintended consequences of decreasing consumption and increasing waste.

    “While improving the nutritional profile of the milk meal component, nutrition standards limiting fat content may have had the unintended consequences of decreasing consumption and increasing waste (47,66,67) .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [47] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [66]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [67] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although milk is required to be offered to every student at every school meal, the majority of school-age children fail to meet dairy consumption recommendations.

    “Although milk is required to be offered to every student at every school meal, the majority of school-age children fail to meet dairy consumption recommendations (56,65) .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [56] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [65]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Milk is required to be offered to every student at every school meal.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The analysis is embedded within a larger qualitative exploration of stakeholder perceptions of BIC; while questions in the data collection instruments related specifically to food waste, additional and more focused questions and probes have more fully captured the phenomenon's complexity, including detail about its occurrence and mitigation strategies.

    “Finally, the analysis is embedded within a larger qualitative exploration of stakeholder perceptions of BIC; while questions in the data collection instruments related specifically to food waste, additional and more focused questions and probes have more fully captured the phenomenon's complexity, including detail about its occurrence and mitigation strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    More than half of US children are expected to be of Hispanic, Black or Asian descent by 2019.

    “With more than half of US children expected to be of Hispanic, Black or Asian decent by 2019 (68) , populations at increased risk for lactose malabsorption and intolerance (69)(70)(71) , offering non-dairy milks may increase acceptability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [68] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Written and/or verbal informed consent was obtained from all adult participants and informed assent was obtained from children.

    “Written and/or verbal informed consent was obtained from all adult participants and informed assent was obtained from children.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
51 of 51
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The school community's perspectives are necessary to identify and implement efficient and effective mitigation strategies.

    “In order to identify and implement efficient and effective mitigation strategies, consideration of the school community's perspectives is imperative.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Once milk is offered in the classroom, food safety standards require that it be disposed.

    “Whereas in the cafeteria, milk that children refused could be reserved, once offered in the classroom, food safety standards required that it be disposed.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The current study is the first to report on stakeholders' perceptions of food waste in the SBP.

    “To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first to report on stakeholders' perceptions of food waste in the SBP.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Beginning in 2014, schools will be required to double the quantity of fruit offered in the SBP from one-half to one cup, and students will be required to take one-half cup.

    “Beginning in 2014, schools will be required to double the quantity of fruit offered in the SBP from one-half to one cup, and students will be required to take one-half cup.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The SBP operates under unique scheduling and service constraints.

    “However, because the SBP operates under unique scheduling and service constraints, the transferability of these strategies is unknown.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Each SBP delivery model, further differentiated by cost structure, faces unique waste challenges.

    “Even within the SBP, each delivery model, further differentiated by cost structure, faces unique waste challenges.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Milk is required to be offered to every student at every school meal.

    “Although milk is required to be offered to every student at every school meal, the majority of school-age children fail to meet dairy consumption recommendations (56,65) .”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Logistical improvements at the institutional level, particularly schools, include enabling the storage of intact food for later use, modification of policies which encourage waste, and changes to daily operations.

    “Logistical improvements at the institutional level, particularly schools, which have been identified include enabling the storage of intact food for later use, modification of policies which encourage waste (e.g., mandating students take certain foods), and changes to daily operations (e.g., increasing time students have to eat) (Blondin et al. 2015).”

    From Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development (2016) · cites this paper as Blondin et al. 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 2014, The State of America’s Children ® 2014 Report
  2. Hewins, 2014, School Breakfast Scorecard: 2012–2013 School Year
  3. 2013, Food Waste Footprint: Impacts on Natural Resources. Summary Report
  4. Hollingsworth, 1995, Waste stream analyses in seven selected school food service operations, Sch Food Serv Res Rev, 19, 81
  5. Bergman, 2004, The relationship between the length of the lunch period and nutrient consumption in the elementary school lunch setting, J Child Nutr Manage, 28, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blondin, S. A., Djang, H. C., Metayer, N., Anzman-Frasca, S., & Economos, C. D.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Blondin, Stacy A
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2014-12-29
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
1565-1577
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2146670852
Cited by
83
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food waste, School Breakfast Program, universal free school meals, stakeholder perspectives, elementary school students, portion size, composting, food donation
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Food Services, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Risk Factors, Schools, United States, Urban Population, Focus Groups, Waste Management, Breakfast

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review