Cited by 116Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, DietNutritional Studies and Diet

Psychosocial Correlates of Fruit, Vegetable, and Dietary Fat Intake among Adolescent Boys and Girls

Zabinski, Marion F., Daly, Tracy, Norman, Gregory J., Rupp, Joan W., Calfas, Karen J., Sallis, James F., Patrick, Kevin·2006·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

Objective This study examined whether hypothesized psychosocial correlates of behavior change (family/peer influence, pros, cons, self-efficacy, parent/child change strategies, and household eating rules) are associated with consumption of fruits, vegetables, and dietary fat among adolescent boys and girls. Design This cross-sectional study used questionnaires to assess psychosocial variables and multiple 24-hour recall interviews to assess dietary intake (daily servings of fruits and vegetables and percentage energy intake from dietary fat). Subjects In this study, 878 adolescents (53.6% female, 57.9% white, mean age 12.8 years, age range 11 to 15 years) completed questionnaires. Statistical analyses performed Hierarchical linear regressions were conducted on the entire sample as well as on subgroups based on sex and age (young/old). Results Results indicated that child behavior change strategies, decisional balance, and household rules were related to percentage energy intake from total fat, whereas child behavior change strategies, family influence, and household rules were related to daily servings of fruit and vegetables. More psychosocial correlates were found for older than for younger adolescents. Conclusions Both psychological and social correlates of adolescent eating behaviors were identified, and correlates differed somewhat by adolescent subgroup. Based on these findings, promising intervention strategies that include the following should be evaluated: helping adolescents alter decisional balance, teaching behavior-change strategies, and helping parents support children's dietary changes and institute supportive household rules.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jada.2006.03.014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zabinski, M. F., Daly, T., Norman, G. J., Rupp, J. W., Calfas, K. J., Sallis, J. F., & Patrick, K.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
106
Issue
6
Pages
814-821
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990642037
Cited by
116
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 15
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA081495)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
adolescent eating behavior, fruit and vegetable intake, dietary fat intake, psychosocial correlates, family influence, peer influence, self-efficacy, behavior change strategies, decisional balance, parent-child communication, sex differences, age differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Behavior, Child, Diet, Dietary Fats, Family, Female, Fruit, Humans, Life Style, Male, Parents, Psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Sex Characteristics, Vegetables, Diet Records, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review