Need for Technological Innovation in Dietary Assessment
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditional dietary self-monitoring methods can be burdensome to people.
“These methods can be burdensome to people [6,7,15-17] and suffer from underreporting and recall issues [15-19].”
From Factors related to sustained use of a free mobile app for dietary self-monitoring with photography and peer feedback: retrospective cohort study (2014) · cites this paper as [15]
Traditional dietary self-monitoring methods suffer from underreporting and recall issues.
“These methods can be burdensome to people [6,7,15-17] and suffer from underreporting and recall issues [15-19].”
From Factors related to sustained use of a free mobile app for dietary self-monitoring with photography and peer feedback: retrospective cohort study (2014) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 349
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [31]Zimmerman TP Stumbo P Chenard C Braithwaite E Selley B 2008 international nutrient databank directory National Nutrient Database Conference Web site http://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/gcrc/nndc/survey.htmlUpdated 2008 Accessed May 14, 2009.
- [50]Yao N Sclabassi R Zhao R Zhang H Sun M A laser based depth measurement method for digital imaging of close-up objects Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanics in Medicine and Biology Pittsburgh, PA July 23–25: 2008
- Authors
- Thompson, F. E., Subar, A. F., Loria, C. M., Reedy, J. L., & Baranowski, T.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thompson, Frances E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Dietetic Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-51
- ISSN
- 0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2823476
- OpenAlex
- W2143527605
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 11.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (Z99 CA999999)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
- Keywords
- dietary assessment, technological innovation, physical activity measurement
- MeSH terms
- Dietetics, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Biomarkers, Nutrition Assessment, Diet Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
