Cited by 143Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorDigital Mental Health Interventions

Factors related to sustained use of a free mobile app for dietary self-monitoring with photography and peer feedback: retrospective cohort study

Open access
Helander, Elina, Kaipainen, Kirsikka, Korhonen, Ilkka, Wansink, Brian·2014·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthy eating interventions that use behavior change techniques such as self-monitoring and feedback have been associated with stronger effects. Mobile apps can make dietary self-monitoring easy with photography and potentially reach huge populations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the factors related to sustained use of a free mobile app ("The Eatery") that promotes healthy eating through photographic dietary self-monitoring and peer feedback. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the sample of 189,770 people who had downloaded the app and used it at least once between October 2011 and April 2012. Adherence was defined based on frequency and duration of self-monitoring. People who had taken more than one picture were classified as "Users" and people with one or no pictures as "Dropouts". Users who had taken at least 10 pictures and used the app for at least one week were classified as "Actives", Users with 2-9 pictures as "Semi-actives", and Dropouts with one picture as "Non-actives". The associations between adherence, registration time, dietary preferences, and peer feedback were examined. Changes in healthiness ratings over time were analyzed among Actives. RESULTS: Overall adherence was low-only 2.58% (4895/189,770) used the app actively. The day of week and time of day the app was initially used was associated with adherence, where 20.28% (5237/25,820) of Users had started using the app during the daytime on weekdays, in comparison to 15.34% (24,718/161,113) of Dropouts. Users with strict diets were more likely to be Active (14.31%, 900/6291) than those who had not defined any diet (3.99%, 742/18,590), said they ate everything (9.47%, 3040/32,090), or reported some other diet (11.85%, 213/1798) (χ(2) 3=826.6, P<.001). The average healthiness rating from peers for the first picture was higher for Active users (0.55) than for Semi-actives (0.52) or Non-actives (0.49) (F2,58167=225.9, P<.001). Actives wrote more often a textual description for the first picture than Semi-actives or Non-actives (χ(2) 2=3515.1, P<.001). Feedback beyond ratings was relatively infrequent: 3.83% (15,247/398,228) of pictures received comments and 15.39% (61,299/398,228) received "likes" from other users. Actives were more likely to have at least one comment or one "like" for their pictures than Semi-actives or Non-actives (χ(2) 2=343.6, P<.001, and χ(2) 2=909.6, P<.001, respectively). Only 9.89% (481/4863) of Active users had a positive trend in their average healthiness ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Most people who tried out this free mobile app for dietary self-monitoring did not continue using it actively and those who did may already have been healthy eaters. Hence, the societal impact of such apps may remain small if they fail to reach those who would be most in need of dietary changes. Incorporating additional self-regulation techniques such as goal-setting and intention formation into the app could potentially increase user engagement and promote sustained use.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a retrospective cohort of 189,770 users of the free iPhone app “The Eatery,” sustained dietary self-monitoring was very low: only 2.58% became active users. Higher adherence was associated with starting the app on weekday daytime, having a strict diet, and receiving more peer feedback on the first picture.

Key findings

  • Overall adherence was low: only 2.58% (4,895/189,770) used the app actively, while 69.03% took no valid pictures and 17.36% took only one valid picture.
  • Users were more likely than Dropouts to start using the app during daytime on weekdays (20.28%, 5,237/25,820 vs 15.34%, 24,718/161,113) and especially on Tuesdays (17.66%, 4,561/25,820 vs 14.88%, 23,974/161,113).
  • Users with strict diets were more likely to be Active (14.31%, 900/6,291) than those with no defined diet (3.99%, 742/18,590), those who ate everything (9.47%, 3,040/32,090), or those reporting another diet (11.85%, 213/1,798).
  • Peer feedback on the first picture was higher for Actives: average healthiness rating 0.55 vs 0.52 for Semi-actives and 0.49 for Non-actives; Actives also more often received comments or likes. Overall, only 3.83% (15,247/398,228) of pictures received comments and 15.39% (61,299/398,228) received likes, and only 9.89% (481/4,863) of Actives had a positive trend in healthiness ratings.

Methods

  • Retrospective cohort analysis of 189,770 people who downloaded and used “The Eatery” at least once between October 15, 2011, and April 3, 2012; they generated 429,288 pictures and 7,946,447 ratings, with 398,228 pictures classified as valid after exclusions.
  • Adherence groups were defined by valid pictures and usage period: Dropouts (no or one valid picture), Users (>1 valid picture), Actives (≥10 pictures and ≥1 week of use), Semi-actives (2–9 pictures or <1 week), and Non-actives (one valid picture).
  • Analyses used chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction for registration time, chi-square and Tukey’s HSD for dietary preferences, ANOVA and chi-square for first-picture description and peer feedback, and per-user linear regression among Actives to identify healthiness-rating trends.

Limitations

  • Stated: the study lacked user demographics, behavioral outcomes, and initial motives; crowdsourced healthiness ratings may be unreliable; users did not photograph everything they ate; location data were not exploited; minor app updates were not analyzed; and the app lacked goal-setting and intention-formation techniques.
  • Evident: the retrospective observational design cannot establish causality, and the sample is self-selected free-app users, likely English-speaking iPhone users, limiting generalizability.
  • Evident: adherence classifications and the valid-picture threshold of 10 ratings may affect how users were categorized.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.3084

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 71 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Only 9.89% (481/4863) of Active users had a positive trend in their average healthiness ratings.

    “Only 9.89% (481/4863) of Active users had a positive trend in their average healthiness ratings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Only 2.58% (4895/189,770) of users used the app actively.

    “Overall adherence was low—only 2.58% (4895/189,770) used the app actively.”
    • Also stated in: § Overall Adherence and Healthiness Ratings · plain
      “Only 2.58% (4895/189,770) of the users became Active users, whereas more than two-thirds of the users did not take any valid pictures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The few active users used the application on average 1.5 months.

    “However, the few active users used the application on average 1.5 months.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    On average, Actives took 1.6 pictures per day.

    “On average, Actives took 1.6 pictures per day and 14.99% (734/4895) of them took more than three pictures per day.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Users with Strict diets had higher healthiness scores than users in other dietary preference categories.

    “Users with Strict diets had higher healthiness scores than users in other dietary preference categories and they also had the highest proportion of Improvers (Table 8).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The crowdsourced healthiness ratings validly reflect the healthiness of the photographed foods.
  • May combine two claims. 38
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 69
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Half (50.45%) of users with Strict diets were Semi-active or Active, a significantly higher proportion than among users who had not defined their diets.

    “A similar trend was observed when Semi-active users were included in the comparisons: half (50.45%, 3174/6291) of the users with Strict diets were Semi-active or Active, a significantly higher proportion than among users who had not defined their diets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of all ratings given, users in the Not defined diet group gave 21.81%, the Everything group 52.83%, the Strict group 20.70%, and the Other group 4.66%.

    “users in the “Not defined” diet group gave 21.81% (1,732,976/7,946,447) of all ratings, users in the “Everything” group gave 52.83% (4,198,272/7,946,447), users with Strict diets gave 20.70% (1,645,134/7,946,447), and users with some Other diet gave 4.66% (370,065/7,946,447) of all ratings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Active users had a higher average healthiness rating and a higher proportion of pictures with comments and likes than less active users.

    “Small but significant differences were found between Active and less active users for all variables: the average healthiness rating was higher and the proportion of pictures having comments and likes was higher.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The average healthiness rating of valid pictures was 0.58, slightly above the midpoint of the fat-fit scale from 0 to 1.

    “Their average healthiness rating, 0.58, was slightly above the midpoint of the fat-fit scale from 0 to 1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most users did not take any pictures (69%) or took only one picture (17%).

    “Most of the users did not take any pictures (69%) or took only one picture (17%), which means that they only downloaded the app and experimented with it once without starting dietary self-monitoring.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Almost 190,000 people downloaded The Eatery between October 2011 and April 2012, but less than 3% were active users (used the app for more than a week and took 10 or more food pictures).

    “Almost 190,000 people downloaded the app, The Eatery, between October 2011 and April 2012, but attrition was very high: less than 3% were active users, that is, used the app for more than a week and took 10 or more food pictures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Most common dietary preferences reported by users during first use were "I eat everything" (46.33%) or undefined (42.22%).

    “Most common dietary preferences (see Table 2) reported by users during the first use of the app were “I eat everything” (46.33%) or undefined (42.22%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Initiation of self-monitoring in the middle of the week during daytime and the amount of feedback from peers were connected to higher adherence.

    “Moreover, initiation of self-monitoring in the middle of the week during daytime and the amount of feedback from peers were connected to higher adherence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Differences in users' ideas about what healthy or fit food is do not seem to have influenced adherence in this study.

    “People may also have very different ideas about what healthy or “fit” food is, but these differences do not seem to have influenced adherence in this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    More than half of active users (53%) gave a textual description for their first picture whereas less than one-fifth of non-active users (18%) did so.

    “This is supported by the finding that more than half of the active users (53%) gave a textual description for their first picture whereas less than one-fifth of the non-active users (18%) did so.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although active users obtained more comments and likes than those who took only few pictures, the total percentage of pictures with comments (4%) and likes (15%) was quite low.

    “Although active users obtained more comments and likes for their pictures from peers than those who took only few pictures, the total percentage of pictures with comments (4%) and likes (15%) was quite low.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Users with strict diets gave 21% of all ratings although only 9% of all users belonged to the strict group.

    “They also gave 21% of all ratings, although only 9% of all users belonged to the strict group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Users' self-reported dietary preferences accurately reflect their actual diets.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    As with most mobile apps, the majority of users tried the dietary self-monitoring app only once.

    “As with most mobile apps, the majority of users tried the dietary self-monitoring app only once.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Although the difference between the user's own rating and average peer ratings was highest among active users, in practice this difference was very small.

    “Although the difference between the user’s own rating and average peer ratings was highest among active users, in practice this difference was very small.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Self-monitoring of food intake is a recommended behavioral strategy in weight control and improvement of dietary habits.

    “On an individual level, one behavioral strategy recommended in weight control and improvement of dietary habits is self-monitoring of food intake [2,3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] National Institute of Health (NIH)Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report19982013-11-04Bethesda, MDNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutehttp://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/prctgd_c.pdf6KsKK0SU3

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Knowledge about healthy eating is not sufficient on its own to change eating behavior.

    “Knowledge about healthy eating is not sufficient on its own to change eating behavior [1].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Contento, I, 1995, Journal of Nutrition Education

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Smartphones and photography can be used to make self-monitoring easy and convenient.

    “Smartphones and photography can be used to make self-monitoring easy and convenient [6-9].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [6] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] Glanz, K, 2006, Am J Health Promot source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In a free online weight loss program, more frequent weight monitoring was associated with greater weight loss.

    “Another study on members of a free online weight loss program found that more frequent weight monitoring was associated with greater weight loss, but no association was found between dietary monitoring frequency and weight loss [13].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Traditional dietary self-monitoring methods suffer from underreporting and recall issues.

    “These methods can be burdensome to people [6,7,15-17] and suffer from underreporting and recall issues [15-19].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [17] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18] Frobisher, C, 2003, J Hum Nutr Diet source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] Lee, CD, 2012, J Diabetes Sci Technol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Individualized feedback has been found to be associated with higher adherence to online interventions promoting healthy lifestyles.

    “Individualized feedback has been found to be associated with higher adherence to online interventions promoting healthy lifestyles [22,23].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although it is still difficult to estimate food ingredients and portion sizes from a photograph, efforts to develop estimation algorithms based on image processing or crowdsourcing are underway.

    “Although it is still difficult to estimate food ingredients and portion sizes from a photograph, efforts to develop estimation algorithms based on image processing or crowdsourcing are underway [6,16].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [6] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The duration of the monitoring period has varied from eight weeks to two years in different studies.

    “The degree of monitoring is typically reported as the number of food diaries/entries completed per day and/or week, and the duration of the monitoring period has varied from eight weeks to two years in different studies [3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Reviews on Web-based interventions have found that adherence is generally lower outside randomized controlled trials.

    “Little research exists about usage behavior of health-promoting apps, but reviews on Web-based interventions have found that adherence is generally lower outside randomized controlled trials and some observational studies have reported adherence rates as low as 1% [29].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some observational studies have reported adherence rates as low as 1%.

    “Little research exists about usage behavior of health-promoting apps, but reviews on Web-based interventions have found that adherence is generally lower outside randomized controlled trials and some observational studies have reported adherence rates as low as 1% [29].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A pilot study using disposable cameras suggests that recording food before eating can lead to increased consideration of dietary habits and alter food choices better than written diaries.

    “A pilot study using disposable cameras suggests that recording food before eating can lead to increased consideration of dietary habits and alter food choices better than written diaries [21].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Traditional methods for dietary self-monitoring include more or less detailed food diaries and calorie counting.

    “Traditional methods for dietary self-monitoring include more or less detailed food diaries and calorie counting [14].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Thompson, FE, 2008, Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In a six-month intervention study, greater weight loss was associated with more frequent monitoring.

    “For example, a six-month intervention study found that the average number of food records per week was 3.7 and greater weight loss was associated with more frequent monitoring [12].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In weight loss studies, consistent recording of food intake appears to be one of the most effective methods.

    “In weight loss studies, consistent recording of food intake appears to be one of the most effective methods [3,11].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [11] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Feedback on performance is a self-regulation technique that either reinforces the current behavior or creates a discrepancy between current and ideal behavior.

    “Feedback on performance is a self-regulation technique that either reinforces the current behavior or creates a discrepancy between current and ideal behavior [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Carver, CS, 1982, Psychol Bull source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In a free online weight loss program, no association was found between dietary monitoring frequency and weight loss.

    “Another study on members of a free online weight loss program found that more frequent weight monitoring was associated with greater weight loss, but no association was found between dietary monitoring frequency and weight loss [13].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The percentage of food records made within 15 minutes of eating has been found to be associated with weight loss.

    “Methods that can minimize the temporal distance between eating and recording food intake are likely to improve outcomes; the percentage of food records made within 15 minutes of eating has been found to be associated with weight loss [20].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Beyond nutritional assessments, technology can be used to share advice and feedback on healthy eating between users.

    “Beyond nutritional assessments, technology can be used to share advice and feedback on healthy eating between users [27].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Parker, A, 2012, CHI'12 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    In terms of the content of feedback, encouraging reflection and self-monitoring may be more important than detailed analysis of nutritional contents when the target is to change eating behavior.

    “In terms of the content of feedback, encouraging reflection and self-monitoring may be more important than detailed analysis of nutritional contents when the target is to change eating behavior [10,24,25].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [10] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mobile apps can provide automated feedback on the healthiness of the food based on the photo and also leverage other users to provide feedback through crowdsourcing.

    “Mobile apps can provide automated feedback on the healthiness of the food based on the photo and also leverage other users to provide feedback through crowdsourcing [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Dietary self-monitoring prompts people to reflect on their current behavior and compare it to ideal behavior.

    “Dietary self-monitoring prompts people to reflect on their current behavior and compare it to ideal behavior [4,10].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Carver, CS, 1982, Psychol Bull source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Capturing images of food may improve adherence and accuracy in some groups, such as among adolescents who may be less motivated to keep detailed food diaries.

    “Capturing images of food may improve adherence and accuracy in some groups, such as among adolescents who may be less motivated to keep detailed food diaries [8].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In a six-month intervention study, the average number of food records per week was 3.7.

    “For example, a six-month intervention study found that the average number of food records per week was 3.7 and greater weight loss was associated with more frequent monitoring [12].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Evaluation of PlateMate suggested that crowd-generated assessments were almost as accurate as those done by professional nutritionists, although pictures containing ambiguous items such as beverages or salad dressing received inaccurate ratings.

    “Evaluation of the app suggested that these crowd-generated assessments were almost as accurate as those done by professional nutritionists, although pictures containing ambiguous items such as beverages or salad dressing received inaccurate ratings [26].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Noronha, J, 2011, Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The degree of monitoring is typically reported as the number of food diaries/entries completed per day and/or week.

    “The degree of monitoring is typically reported as the number of food diaries/entries completed per day and/or week, and the duration of the monitoring period has varied from eight weeks to two years in different studies [3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple comparisons, with adjusted significance level P=.0014.

    “Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple comparisons and the adjusted significance level was set at P=.0014.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Dietary self-monitoring for about 1.5 months would be enough to lead to increased awareness of eating habits and changes in behavior, if done diligently.

    “Dietary self-monitoring for this amount of time would be enough to lead to increased awareness of eating habits and changes in behavior, if done diligently.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Registration time was not available for 1.49% of the users.

    “Registration time was not available for 1.49% of the users (2837/189,770).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Changes in healthiness ratings were analyzed only among Active users who had at least one valid picture among the first two pictures they had taken (99.35% of Actives).

    “Changes in healthiness ratings were analyzed only among Active users who had at least one valid picture among the first two pictures they had taken (99.35% of Actives, 4863/4895).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The study found that sessions with apps were short, averaging a little more than a minute.

    “The study found that sessions with apps were short, averaging a little more than a minute, and that different types of apps were used during different times of the day.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Böhmer, M, 2011, MobileHCI'11 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Communication apps were the most frequently used, 49.50% of app launches, whereas the proportion of health apps was only 0.26% of all app launches.

    “Communication apps were the most frequently used, 49.50% of app launches, whereas the proportion of health apps was only 0.26% of all app launches [30].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Böhmer, M, 2011, MobileHCI'11 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given the short usage period for the majority of users, many probably tried out the application for fun.

    “Given the short usage period for majority of the users, many probably tried out the application for fun.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    People's eating patterns and daily routines vary over the week.

    “Considering that people’s eating patterns and daily routines vary over the week [31,32], analyzing the temporal context of app usage may help identify the best times to start using an app that promotes lifestyle changes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [31] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [32] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Users did not photograph only healthy foods and there was room for improvement.

    “Hence, users did not photograph only healthy foods and there was room for improvement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The crowdsourced healthiness ratings validly reflect the healthiness of the photographed foods.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The pattern of easy joining and trying out without serious intention or commitment is similar to most free apps.

    “This is similar to most free apps, which are easy to join and try out even if there is no serious intention or commitment to start using the app [13,25].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The positive trend among some users could also mean that they started gaming the system by selectively photographing their foods to get better ratings and comments.

    “Thus, the positive trend among some users could also mean that they started “gaming the system” by selectively photographing their foods to get better ratings and comments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    The Eatery was not marketed as a weight loss app but as a method to eat healthier (Stop counting calories, start eating better).

    “The Eatery was not marketed as a weight loss app but instead as a method to eat healthier (“Stop counting calories, start eating better”), and hence may have attracted a large number of users with no real interest in dietary improvements and thus lacking motivation for dietary self-monitoring.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Eatery may have attracted a large number of users with no real interest in dietary improvements and thus lacking motivation for dietary self-monitoring.

    “The Eatery was not marketed as a weight loss app but instead as a method to eat healthier (“Stop counting calories, start eating better”), and hence may have attracted a large number of users with no real interest in dietary improvements and thus lacking motivation for dietary self-monitoring.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The proportion of users who had downloaded the app less than one week before the sampling period ended was 2.01%, and they were still included in the analyses due to their small number.

    “The proportion of users who had downloaded the app less than one week before the sampling period ended (on March 28, 2012 or later) was 2.01% (3812/189,770). Hence, they could not be classified as Actives. They were still included in the analyses due to their small number.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Improvers used the app for a longer time and did dietary self-monitoring more frequently than other Actives.

    “In other words, they used the app for a longer time and did dietary self-monitoring more frequently.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    One of the few articles published about mobile app usage examined data that was collected from 4125 users between August 2010 and January 2011.

    “One of the few articles published about mobile app usage examined data that was collected from 4125 users between August 2010 and January 2011 [30].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Böhmer, M, 2011, MobileHCI'11 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Pictures with fewer than 10 ratings were excluded as invalid, based on manual inspection.

    “By manual inspection, the threshold of a valid picture was adjusted to 10 ratings: if the first picture taken by a user had received less than 10 ratings, the picture information was excluded and the second picture was used instead.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Different types of apps were used during different times of the day.

    “The study found that sessions with apps were short, averaging a little more than a minute, and that different types of apps were used during different times of the day.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Böhmer, M, 2011, MobileHCI'11 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The overall quality and content of the pictures was screened by the researchers by examining a random sample of pictures.

    “The overall quality and content of the pictures was screened by the researchers by examining a random sample of pictures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Practical advice for healthy eating could have been given by formation of implementation intentions through if-then planning, which has been shown to increase effectiveness of healthy eating interventions.

    “Practical advice for healthy eating could also have been given by formation of implementation intentions through if-then planning, which has been shown to increase effectiveness of healthy eating interventions [10].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The most significant limitation of the study is the lack of information about user demographics, behavioral outcomes, and initial motives.

    “The most significant limitation of the study is the lack of information about user demographics, behavioral outcomes, and initial motives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    General statistics about smartphone users in early 2012 suggest that iPhone users were slightly older than Android users and downloaded more apps in a month than users of other smartphone systems.

    “The general statistics about smartphone users in early 2012 suggest that iPhone users were slightly older than Android users and downloaded more apps in a month than users of other smartphone systems [37].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] Alexander A2014-03-31Smartphone usage statistics 2012 (infographic)http://ansonalex.com/infographics/smartphone-usage-statistics-2012-infographic/6OTvN95oZ

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Crowdsourced ratings can be biased, resulting from cultural differences or the rater's own food preferences.

    “Crowdsourced ratings can be biased, resulting from cultural differences [26] or rater’s own food preferences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Noronha, J, 2011, Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dietary decisions are often unconscious and affected by environmental factors more than people believe.

    “Dietary decisions are often unconscious and affected by environmental factors more than people believe [39].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Even though the app reached a large number of people, its actual impact among users remained small because most did not even start dietary self-monitoring with the app.

    “Even though the findings show that the app reached a large number of people, its actual impact among users remained small because most did not even start dietary self-monitoring with the app.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Implementing these techniques could have given users a more specific purpose for using the app.

    “Implementing these techniques could have given users a more specific purpose for using the app.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The app did not prompt users to set specific goals or review behavioral goals and only implicitly prompted intention formation (eat healthy).

    “The app did not prompt users to set specific goals or review behavioral goals and only implicitly prompted intention formation (“eat healthy”).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    In this study, the location information of where the pictures were taken was available but was not exploited.

    “In this study, the location information of where the pictures were taken was available, but was not exploited, although dietary behaviors are likely to be linked with locations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prior studies have found that diet quality is generally poorer during weekends than on weekdays and calorie intake is higher, especially in the form of fat and alcohol.

    “Prior studies have found that diet quality is generally poorer during weekends than on weekdays and calorie intake is higher, especially in the form of fat and alcohol [31,32,35]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [31] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [32] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [35] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The app utilized self-regulation techniques of self-monitoring and feedback but lacked other techniques derived from control theory.

    “Finally, the app utilized self-regulation techniques of self-monitoring and feedback, but lacked other techniques derived from control theory [4,5].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Carver, CS, 1982, Psychol Bull source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Because a higher proportion of active users first used the app during weekdays and daytime, the food they chose to photograph first was probably their workday lunch, which is often healthier than foods eaten during weekends.

    “Because a higher proportion of active users also used the app for the first time during weekdays and daytime, the food that they chose to photograph first was probably their workday lunch, which is often healthier than foods that are eaten during weekends [35].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The app did not implement all self-regulation techniques that could have strengthened its impact and it lacked means to track changes in eating behavior systematically.

    “Still, the app did not implement all self-regulation techniques that could have strengthened its impact and it lacked means to track changes in eating behavior systematically.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The association between outcomes and adherence to dietary self-monitoring has been found to differ between race and gender groups in weight loss interventions.

    “the association between outcomes and adherence to dietary self-monitoring has been found to differ between race and gender groups in weight loss interventions [12]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    The app itself did not offer explicit advice on what to do to improve eating habits or what constitutes a healthy diet.

    “The app itself did not offer explicit advice on what to do to improve eating habits or what constitutes a healthy diet.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This could mean that this kind of application attracts users with special diets and/or those interested in food.

    “This could mean that this kind of an application attracts users with special diets and/or those interested in food.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    If people used the app as intended for dietary self-monitoring on a regular basis, they could experience some benefits through heightened awareness of their eating habits.

    “If people would use the app as intended for dietary self-monitoring on a regular basis, they could experience some benefits through heightened awareness of their eating habits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Users did not photograph everything they ate, so there is no way of knowing how healthily people ate in general and whether the observed positive trend in healthiness ratings among 10% of active users meant anything in practice.

    “Moreover, users did not photograph everything they ate so there is no way of knowing how healthily people ate in general and whether the observed positive trend in healthiness ratings among 10% of active users meant anything in practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Someone who downloads a healthy eating app in the middle of the week during daytime probably has the intention to start keeping track of their eating.

    “In contrast, someone who downloads a healthy eating app in the middle of the week during daytime probably has the intention to start keeping track of their eating.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is possible that users with strict diets were already most interested in healthy eating.

    “Hence, it is possible that users with strict diets were already most interested in healthy eating.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Portion size estimation is difficult even when measurement aids are present in the picture.

    “Portion size estimation is difficult even when measurement aids are present in the picture [18,19,38].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] Frobisher, C, 2003, J Hum Nutr Diet source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] Lee, CD, 2012, J Diabetes Sci Technol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [38] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The timing of initial use of the dietary self-monitoring app may be important both for users' pre-existing motivation and the type of reinforcing feedback generated by the app.

    “Hence, the timing of the initial use of the dietary self-monitoring app may be important both in terms of the users’ pre-existing motivation and the type of reinforcing feedback generated by the app.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The social network formed in this way is very loose: users neither know whose pictures they rate nor who rates their pictures.

    “The social network formed in such a way is very loose: users neither know whose pictures they rate nor have any knowledge of who rates their pictures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Some updates were released to the app during the six-month data collection; they consisted of minor modifications and fixes to the user interface and were not included in the analyses since the main features and functions remained the same.

    “Some updates were released to the app during the six-month timeframe of data collection. These updates consisted of minor modification and fixes in the user interface of the app. They may have had a minor influence on the user experience of the app, but they were not included in the analyses since the main features and functions remained the same.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    If users are merely told that their meal is unhealthy but not given advice on how to make it better, they do not get enough value out of the experience and subsequently lack motivation to continue using the app.

    “It may be that if users are merely told that their meal is unhealthy but not given any advice on what to do to make it better, they do not get enough value out of the experience and subsequently lack motivation to continue using the app [36].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Engaging in giving ratings for a long time might require an existing community or formation of stronger ties between users.

    “However, engaging in this activity for a long time might require an existing community or formation of stronger ties between users [27].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Parker, A, 2012, CHI'12 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    One explanation for participation in giving ratings is reciprocity: when a user rates someone else's pictures, they also get ratings for their own.

    “One explanation is the reciprocity of the action: when a user rates someone else’s pictures, they also get ratings for their own.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Users of The Eatery owned an iPhone, so it is possible that their characteristics followed the same pattern as other iPhone users.

    “Users of The Eatery owned an iPhone so it is possible that their characteristics followed the same pattern.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The middle of the week during daytime could be a fruitful time to suggest initiation of lifestyle changes.

    “This time period could also be a fruitful time to suggest initiation of lifestyle changes, although everyone does not have the same work schedules.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
87 of 87
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It is not known whether such mobile apps for independent use would engage people and reach those who could benefit the most from dietary monitoring.

    “However, it is not known whether such mobile apps for independent use would engage people and reach those who could benefit the most from dietary monitoring.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It is not clear how consistent self-monitoring needs to be for the method to be effective.

    “Yet it is not clear how consistent self-monitoring needs to be for the method to be effective.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It is not clear whether results tell more about an individual’s engagement to the program or specifically about the effect of monitoring.

    “Overall, it is not clear whether these results tell more about an individual’s engagement to the program or specifically about the effect of monitoring.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Studies have mostly focused on weight loss, not on prevention of weight gain through improvement of eating behavior.

    “Studies have also mostly focused on weight loss, not on prevention of weight gain through improvement of eating behavior.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Little research exists about usage behavior of health-promoting apps.

    “Little research exists about usage behavior of health-promoting apps, but reviews on Web-based interventions have found that adherence is generally lower outside randomized controlled trials and some observational studies have reported adherence rates as low as 1% [29].”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Most users were from Anglo-American culture.

    “These time intervals were chosen to correspond to the natural periods of the day and based on the assumption that most users were from Anglo-American culture, since the app was in English and roughly 68% (127,884/186,933) of the users registered from the main US time zones.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The positive trend in healthiness ratings among some users reflects changes in their real-life eating behavior.

    “Even if we assume that this trend reflects changes in their real-life eating behavior, the impact of the app on eating choices (or choosing which foods to record) appears to have been very small.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The crowdsourced healthiness ratings validly reflect the healthiness of the photographed foods.

    “The average healthiness rating of all pictures was 0.58, slightly above the midpoint on the scale of 0 (“fat”) to 1 (“fit”).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Users' self-reported dietary preferences accurately reflect their actual diets.

    “Users who reported a “strict” diet (low fat, low/no carbs, or vegan/vegetarian) were most likely to become active users.”
9 of 9

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The comparatively higher attrition rate in pure online intervention studies was also evident in this review, where the blended group scored higher in the risk of bias assessment regarding withdrawals and dropouts compared to the online group.

    “Generally, the comparatively higher attrition rate in pure online intervention studies (84–88) was also evident in this review where the blended group scored higher in the risk of bias assessment regarding withdrawals and dropouts compared to the online group.”

    From Digital resilience interventions for healthcare workers: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [85]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Use is not a given for healthcare apps.

    “Furthermore, use is not a given for healthcare apps.”
  • Only 13.6% of people who downloaded the app in Helander's study used the core functionality (taking a picture) more than once.

    “Only 13.6% people who downloaded the app in Helander's study used the core functionality (taking a picture) more than once.”
  • Even the largest group of users deemed "semi-active" (11% of total users) only used the app for an average of 9.3 days.

    “Even the largest group of users deemed “semi-active” (11% of total users) only used the app for an average of 9.3 days.”
  • Many individuals who download a commercially developed health management app never use the app.

    “As illustrated by Helander et al. (2014), many individuals who download a commercially developed health management app never use the app.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Abstract reverses the chi-square results for comments and likes

    Minor

    The abstract assigns χ2=343.6 to comments and χ2=909.6 to likes, respectively. Table 7 assigns 343.6 to likes and 909.6 to comments.

  • Semi-active definition omits short-term users with 10 or more pictures

    Minor

    The abstract limits Semi-actives to users with 2-9 pictures. Table 3 also includes users with at least 10 pictures whose usage period was shorter than seven days.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1016/s00057894(05)80212-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Helander, E., Kaipainen, K., Korhonen, I., & Wansink, B.
Affiliations
  • Tampere University of Technology (FI)
  • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Helander, Elina
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2014-04-15
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
e109
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038327808
Cited by
143
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3
FWCI
27.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Tekes (1104/10)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mobile health apps, dietary self-monitoring, peer feedback, app adherence, healthy eating interventions, food preferences, behaviour change techniques, free apps, dietary behavior change
MeSH terms
Adult, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Patient Dropouts, Peer Group, Photography, Retrospective Studies, Self Care, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review