Factors related to sustained use of a free mobile app for dietary self-monitoring with photography and peer feedback: retrospective cohort study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Healthy eating interventions that use behavior change techniques such as self-monitoring and feedback have been associated with stronger effects. Mobile apps can make dietary self-monitoring easy with photography and potentially reach huge populations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the factors related to sustained use of a free mobile app ("The Eatery") that promotes healthy eating through photographic dietary self-monitoring and peer feedback. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the sample of 189,770 people who had downloaded the app and used it at least once between October 2011 and April 2012. Adherence was defined based on frequency and duration of self-monitoring. People who had taken more than one picture were classified as "Users" and people with one or no pictures as "Dropouts". Users who had taken at least 10 pictures and used the app for at least one week were classified as "Actives", Users with 2-9 pictures as "Semi-actives", and Dropouts with one picture as "Non-actives". The associations between adherence, registration time, dietary preferences, and peer feedback were examined. Changes in healthiness ratings over time were analyzed among Actives. RESULTS: Overall adherence was low-only 2.58% (4895/189,770) used the app actively. The day of week and time of day the app was initially used was associated with adherence, where 20.28% (5237/25,820) of Users had started using the app during the daytime on weekdays, in comparison to 15.34% (24,718/161,113) of Dropouts. Users with strict diets were more likely to be Active (14.31%, 900/6291) than those who had not defined any diet (3.99%, 742/18,590), said they ate everything (9.47%, 3040/32,090), or reported some other diet (11.85%, 213/1798) (χ(2) 3=826.6, P<.001). The average healthiness rating from peers for the first picture was higher for Active users (0.55) than for Semi-actives (0.52) or Non-actives (0.49) (F2,58167=225.9, P<.001). Actives wrote more often a textual description for the first picture than Semi-actives or Non-actives (χ(2) 2=3515.1, P<.001). Feedback beyond ratings was relatively infrequent: 3.83% (15,247/398,228) of pictures received comments and 15.39% (61,299/398,228) received "likes" from other users. Actives were more likely to have at least one comment or one "like" for their pictures than Semi-actives or Non-actives (χ(2) 2=343.6, P<.001, and χ(2) 2=909.6, P<.001, respectively). Only 9.89% (481/4863) of Active users had a positive trend in their average healthiness ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Most people who tried out this free mobile app for dietary self-monitoring did not continue using it actively and those who did may already have been healthy eaters. Hence, the societal impact of such apps may remain small if they fail to reach those who would be most in need of dietary changes. Incorporating additional self-regulation techniques such as goal-setting and intention formation into the app could potentially increase user engagement and promote sustained use.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a retrospective cohort of 189,770 users of the free iPhone app “The Eatery,” sustained dietary self-monitoring was very low: only 2.58% became active users. Higher adherence was associated with starting the app on weekday daytime, having a strict diet, and receiving more peer feedback on the first picture.
Key findings
- Overall adherence was low: only 2.58% (4,895/189,770) used the app actively, while 69.03% took no valid pictures and 17.36% took only one valid picture.
- Users were more likely than Dropouts to start using the app during daytime on weekdays (20.28%, 5,237/25,820 vs 15.34%, 24,718/161,113) and especially on Tuesdays (17.66%, 4,561/25,820 vs 14.88%, 23,974/161,113).
- Users with strict diets were more likely to be Active (14.31%, 900/6,291) than those with no defined diet (3.99%, 742/18,590), those who ate everything (9.47%, 3,040/32,090), or those reporting another diet (11.85%, 213/1,798).
- Peer feedback on the first picture was higher for Actives: average healthiness rating 0.55 vs 0.52 for Semi-actives and 0.49 for Non-actives; Actives also more often received comments or likes. Overall, only 3.83% (15,247/398,228) of pictures received comments and 15.39% (61,299/398,228) received likes, and only 9.89% (481/4,863) of Actives had a positive trend in healthiness ratings.
Methods
- Retrospective cohort analysis of 189,770 people who downloaded and used “The Eatery” at least once between October 15, 2011, and April 3, 2012; they generated 429,288 pictures and 7,946,447 ratings, with 398,228 pictures classified as valid after exclusions.
- Adherence groups were defined by valid pictures and usage period: Dropouts (no or one valid picture), Users (>1 valid picture), Actives (≥10 pictures and ≥1 week of use), Semi-actives (2–9 pictures or <1 week), and Non-actives (one valid picture).
- Analyses used chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction for registration time, chi-square and Tukey’s HSD for dietary preferences, ANOVA and chi-square for first-picture description and peer feedback, and per-user linear regression among Actives to identify healthiness-rating trends.
Limitations
- Stated: the study lacked user demographics, behavioral outcomes, and initial motives; crowdsourced healthiness ratings may be unreliable; users did not photograph everything they ate; location data were not exploited; minor app updates were not analyzed; and the app lacked goal-setting and intention-formation techniques.
- Evident: the retrospective observational design cannot establish causality, and the sample is self-selected free-app users, likely English-speaking iPhone users, limiting generalizability.
- Evident: adherence classifications and the valid-picture threshold of 10 ratings may affect how users were categorized.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 71 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Only 9.89% (481/4863) of Active users had a positive trend in their average healthiness ratings.
“Only 9.89% (481/4863) of Active users had a positive trend in their average healthiness ratings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only 2.58% (4895/189,770) of users used the app actively.
“Overall adherence was low—only 2.58% (4895/189,770) used the app actively.”
- Also stated in: § Overall Adherence and Healthiness Ratings · plain
“Only 2.58% (4895/189,770) of the users became Active users, whereas more than two-thirds of the users did not take any valid pictures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Overall Adherence and Healthiness Ratings · plain
- Findingown data
The few active users used the application on average 1.5 months.
“However, the few active users used the application on average 1.5 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On average, Actives took 1.6 pictures per day.
“On average, Actives took 1.6 pictures per day and 14.99% (734/4895) of them took more than three pictures per day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Users with Strict diets had higher healthiness scores than users in other dietary preference categories.
“Users with Strict diets had higher healthiness scores than users in other dietary preference categories and they also had the highest proportion of Improvers (Table 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The crowdsourced healthiness ratings validly reflect the healthiness of the photographed foods.
- Findingown data
Improvers had a higher number of pictures per day than other Actives (mean 1.80, SD 1.70 vs mean 1.55, SD 1.58).
“These “Improvers” differed from other Actives by having a higher total number of pictures (mean 126.68, SD 183.73 vs mean 51.41, SD 82.16; t 4861=16.19; P<.001), a longer usage period in days (mean 68.17, SD 42.95 vs mean 44.16, SD 36.34; t 4861=13.54; P<.001), and a higher number of pictures per day (mean 1.80, SD 1.70 vs mean 1.55, SD 1.58; t 4861=3.25; P=.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Active users took less than two pictures per day on average.
“Active users took less than two pictures per day on average, which means that a large portion of their eating was left unrecorded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A higher proportion of Users started using the app during the daytime on weekdays than Dropouts (20.28% vs 15.34%).
“A higher proportion of Users started using the app during the daytime on weekdays than Dropouts (20.28%, 5237/25,820 vs 15.34%, 24,718/161,113; χ 2 1=356.3, P<.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Actives wrote more often a textual description for the first picture than Semi-actives or Non-actives.
“Actives wrote more often a textual description for the first picture than Semi-actives or Non-actives (χ2 2=3515.1, P<.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
3.83% of pictures received comments from other users.
“Feedback beyond ratings was relatively infrequent: 3.83% (15,247/398,228) of pictures received comments and 15.39% (61,299/398,228) received “likes” from other users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A higher proportion of Users started using the app on Tuesdays than Dropouts (17.66% vs 14.88%).
“Moreover, a higher proportion of Users started using the app especially during Tuesdays than Dropouts (17.66%, 4561/25,820 vs 14.88%, 23,974/161,113; χ 2 1=133.4, P<.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
14.99% of Actives took more than three pictures per day.
“On average, Actives took 1.6 pictures per day and 14.99% (734/4895) of them took more than three pictures per day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The average description written for the first picture was longer in number of characters among Active users than among Semi-active or Non-active users.
“Active users had written a description for the first picture more often than Semi-actives or Non-actives, and the average description was also longer in the number of characters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The first picture had at least one like among 7.68% (4470/58,170) of the users.
“The first picture had at least one like among 7.68% (4470/58,170) of the users and at least one comment among 3.85% (2240/58,170) of them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
More than two-thirds of users did not take any valid pictures.
“Only 2.58% (4895/189,770) of the users became Active users, whereas more than two-thirds of the users did not take any valid pictures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A positive trend in healthiness ratings was observed among only 10% of active users (0.3% of all users).
“A positive trend in healthiness ratings was still observed among only 10% of active users (0.3% of all users).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The crowdsourced healthiness ratings validly reflect the healthiness of the photographed foods.
- Findingown data
Improvers had a higher total number of pictures than other Actives (mean 126.68, SD 183.73 vs mean 51.41, SD 82.16).
“These “Improvers” differed from other Actives by having a higher total number of pictures (mean 126.68, SD 183.73 vs mean 51.41, SD 82.16; t 4861=16.19; P<.001), a longer usage period in days (mean 68.17, SD 42.95 vs mean 44.16, SD 36.34; t 4861=13.54; P<.001), and a higher number of pictures per day (mean 1.80, SD 1.70 vs mean 1.55, SD 1.58; t 4861=3.25; P=.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Improvers had a longer usage period in days than other Actives (mean 68.17, SD 42.95 vs mean 44.16, SD 36.34).
“These “Improvers” differed from other Actives by having a higher total number of pictures (mean 126.68, SD 183.73 vs mean 51.41, SD 82.16; t 4861=16.19; P<.001), a longer usage period in days (mean 68.17, SD 42.95 vs mean 44.16, SD 36.34; t 4861=13.54; P<.001), and a higher number of pictures per day (mean 1.80, SD 1.70 vs mean 1.55, SD 1.58; t 4861=3.25; P=.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Users who first used the app on weekdays (especially Tuesdays or Wednesdays) and during morning or daytime became semi-active or active users more often than those who started during evenings or weekends.
“Users who used the app for the first time on weekdays (especially on Tuesdays or Wednesdays) and during morning or daytime became semi-active or active users more often than those who started using the app during evenings or weekends.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Users with Strict diets had the highest proportion of Improvers.
“Users with Strict diets had higher healthiness scores than users in other dietary preference categories and they also had the highest proportion of Improvers (Table 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A textual description for the first picture was given by 26.09% (15,179/58,170) of users who had at least one valid picture among the first two pictures they had taken.
“A textual description for the first picture was given by 26.09% (15,179/58,170) of users who had at least one valid picture among the first two pictures they had taken.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Users with strict diets were more likely to be Active than those who had not defined any diet, said they ate everything, or reported some other diet.
“Users with strict diets were more likely to be Active (14.31%, 900/6291) than those who had not defined any diet (3.99%, 742/18,590), said they ate everything (9.47%, 3040/32,090), or reported some other diet (11.85%, 213/1798) (χ2 3=826.6, P<.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The day of week and time of day the app was initially used was associated with adherence.
“The day of week and time of day the app was initially used was associated with adherence, where 20.28% (5237/25,820) of Users had started using the app during the daytime on weekdays, in comparison to 15.34% (24,718/161,113) of Dropouts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The first picture had at least one comment among 3.85% (2240/58,170) of the users.
“The first picture had at least one like among 7.68% (4470/58,170) of the users and at least one comment among 3.85% (2240/58,170) of them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Active users wrote a textual description for the first picture more often than Semi-active or Non-active users.
“Active users had written a description for the first picture more often than Semi-actives or Non-actives, and the average description was also longer in the number of characters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
15.39% of pictures received "likes" from other users.
“Feedback beyond ratings was relatively infrequent: 3.83% (15,247/398,228) of pictures received comments and 15.39% (61,299/398,228) received “likes” from other users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The average healthiness rating of all pictures was 0.58, slightly above the midpoint on the scale of 0 (fat) to 1 (fit).
“The average healthiness rating of all pictures was 0.58, slightly above the midpoint on the scale of 0 (“fat”) to 1 (“fit”).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The crowdsourced healthiness ratings validly reflect the healthiness of the photographed foods.
- Findingown data
Comments and likes were relatively rare even among Active users.
“Still, comments and likes were relatively rare even among Active users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Actives were more likely to have at least one comment or one "like" for their pictures than Semi-actives or Non-actives.
“Actives were more likely to have at least one comment or one “like” for their pictures than Semi-actives or Non-actives (χ2 2=343.6, P<.001, and χ2 2=909.6, P<.001, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Small but significant differences were found between Active and less active users for all peer feedback variables.
“Small but significant differences were found between Active and less active users for all variables: the average healthiness rating was higher and the proportion of pictures having comments and likes was higher.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
8.97% of users were considered to have Strict diets.
“In total, 8.97% of the users were considered to have Strict diets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 4863 Active users who had at least one valid picture as their first or second picture, 481 (9.89%) had a significant positive trend in healthiness scores.
“Among the 4863 Active users who had at least one valid picture as their first or second picture, 481 (9.89%) had a significant positive trend in healthiness scores.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The crowdsourced healthiness ratings validly reflect the healthiness of the photographed foods.
- Findingown data
The average healthiness rating from peers for the first picture was higher for Active users (0.55) than for Semi-actives (0.52) or Non-actives (0.49).
“The average healthiness rating from peers for the first picture was higher for Active users (0.55) than for Semi-actives (0.52) or Non-actives (0.49) (F 2,58167=225.9, P<.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Positive feedback received from peers for the first picture taken by the user was associated with higher adherence.
“Positive feedback received from peers for the first picture taken by the user was associated with higher adherence; active users had higher average healthiness ratings for the first picture than less active users.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Active users with strict diets had higher average healthiness ratings for all pictures than users in other dietary preference groups.
“This is also supported by their healthiness ratings: active users with strict diets had higher average healthiness ratings for their first picture and also higher average healthiness ratings for all pictures than users in other dietary preference groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The crowdsourced healthiness ratings validly reflect the healthiness of the photographed foods.
- Findingown data
Active users with strict diets had higher average healthiness ratings for their first picture than users in other dietary preference groups.
“This is also supported by their healthiness ratings: active users with strict diets had higher average healthiness ratings for their first picture and also higher average healthiness ratings for all pictures than users in other dietary preference groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The crowdsourced healthiness ratings validly reflect the healthiness of the photographed foods.
- Findingown data
Users who reported a strict diet (low fat, low/no carbs, or vegan/vegetarian) were most likely to become active users.
“Users who reported a “strict” diet (low fat, low/no carbs, or vegan/vegetarian) were most likely to become active users.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Users' self-reported dietary preferences accurately reflect their actual diets.
- Findingown data
Adherence was higher among users who had diets that were likely to restrict at least some unhealthy foods.
“Adherence was higher among users who had diets that were likely to restrict at least some unhealthy foods, and these kinds of users were also more active in rating other users’ foods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Users' self-reported dietary preferences accurately reflect their actual diets.
- Findingown data
Active users had higher average healthiness ratings for the first picture than less active users.
“Positive feedback received from peers for the first picture taken by the user was associated with higher adherence; active users had higher average healthiness ratings for the first picture than less active users.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The crowdsourced healthiness ratings validly reflect the healthiness of the photographed foods.
- Findingown data
The dietary preferences reported on initial use were connected to adherence level.
“The dietary preferences reported on the initial use were also connected to adherence level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Users' self-reported dietary preferences accurately reflect their actual diets.
- Findingown data
Users with diets likely to restrict unhealthy foods were also more active in rating other users' foods.
“Adherence was higher among users who had diets that were likely to restrict at least some unhealthy foods, and these kinds of users were also more active in rating other users’ foods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Users' self-reported dietary preferences accurately reflect their actual diets.
- Premisecitation
Healthy eating interventions that use self-monitoring combined with other self-regulation techniques from control theory, such as feedback, appear to be more effective than interventions that do not include these techniques.
“Moreover, healthy eating interventions that use self-monitoring combined with other self-regulation techniques from control theory, such as feedback [4], appear to be more effective than interventions that do not include these techniques [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Methods that can minimize the temporal distance between eating and recording food intake are likely to improve outcomes.
“Methods that can minimize the temporal distance between eating and recording food intake are likely to improve outcomes; the percentage of food records made within 15 minutes of eating has been found to be associated with weight loss [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Traditional dietary self-monitoring methods can be burdensome to people.
“These methods can be burdensome to people [6,7,15-17] and suffer from underreporting and recall issues [15-19].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked - Premisecitation
Attrition is likely to be a significant challenge for mobile apps for healthy eating, since there is usually very little external pressure or incentive to continue usage.
“Although they are easily within anyone’s reach, attrition is likely to be a significant challenge, since there is usually very little external pressure or incentive to continue usage [28].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Most people who tried out this free mobile app for dietary self-monitoring did not continue using it actively.
“Most people who tried out this free mobile app for dietary self-monitoring did not continue using it actively and those who did may already have been healthy eaters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The societal impact of such apps may remain small if they fail to reach those who would be most in need of dietary changes.
“Hence, the societal impact of such apps may remain small if they fail to reach those who would be most in need of dietary changes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Those who did continue using the app actively may already have been healthy eaters.
“Most people who tried out this free mobile app for dietary self-monitoring did not continue using it actively and those who did may already have been healthy eaters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A large portion of active users' eating was left unrecorded.
“Active users took less than two pictures per day on average, which means that a large portion of their eating was left unrecorded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
In total, 398,228 pictures (92.76% of all pictures and 95.76% of non-empty pictures) were classified as valid pictures.
“In total, 398,228 pictures (92.76% of all pictures and 95.76% of non-empty pictures) were classified as valid pictures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Even assuming the positive trend reflects changes in real-life eating behavior, the impact of the app on eating choices (or choosing which foods to record) appears to have been very small.
“Even if we assume that this trend reflects changes in their real-life eating behavior, the impact of the app on eating choices (or choosing which foods to record) appears to have been very small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The positive trend in healthiness ratings among some users reflects changes in their real-life eating behavior.
- Interpretationcitation
People's varying eating patterns that depend on their schedules during workdays and outside work can help explain the association between weekday/daytime first use and higher adherence.
“People’s varying eating patterns that depend on their schedules during workdays and outside work [34] can help explain this finding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
People do not necessarily want to start tracking their eating during evenings or weekends.
“so people do not necessarily want to start tracking their eating at these times.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In addition to pre-existing intention to start dietary self-monitoring, the initial user experience of the app most likely influenced users' intention to continue using it.
“In addition to pre-existing intention to start dietary self-monitoring, the initial user experience of the app most likely influenced the users’ intention to continue using it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Most users had no connection to other users other than receiving and giving anonymous ratings.
“Thus, most users had no connection to other users other than receiving and giving anonymous ratings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The reliability of healthiness ratings is questionable because they were entirely crowdsourced.
“The reliability of healthiness ratings is questionable because they were entirely crowdsourced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The motivation of sustained users might already be seen at the initiation of self-monitoring by how much time and cognitive capacity they devote to it.
“The motivation of sustained users might already be seen on the initiation of self-monitoring by looking at how much time and cognitive capacity they devote to it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 38
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 69
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHalf (50.45%) of users with Strict diets were Semi-active or Active, a significantly higher proportion than among users who had not defined their diets.
“A similar trend was observed when Semi-active users were included in the comparisons: half (50.45%, 3174/6291) of the users with Strict diets were Semi-active or Active, a significantly higher proportion than among users who had not defined their diets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf all ratings given, users in the Not defined diet group gave 21.81%, the Everything group 52.83%, the Strict group 20.70%, and the Other group 4.66%.
“users in the “Not defined” diet group gave 21.81% (1,732,976/7,946,447) of all ratings, users in the “Everything” group gave 52.83% (4,198,272/7,946,447), users with Strict diets gave 20.70% (1,645,134/7,946,447), and users with some Other diet gave 4.66% (370,065/7,946,447) of all ratings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataActive users had a higher average healthiness rating and a higher proportion of pictures with comments and likes than less active users.
“Small but significant differences were found between Active and less active users for all variables: the average healthiness rating was higher and the proportion of pictures having comments and likes was higher.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe average healthiness rating of valid pictures was 0.58, slightly above the midpoint of the fat-fit scale from 0 to 1.
“Their average healthiness rating, 0.58, was slightly above the midpoint of the fat-fit scale from 0 to 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost users did not take any pictures (69%) or took only one picture (17%).
“Most of the users did not take any pictures (69%) or took only one picture (17%), which means that they only downloaded the app and experimented with it once without starting dietary self-monitoring.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlmost 190,000 people downloaded The Eatery between October 2011 and April 2012, but less than 3% were active users (used the app for more than a week and took 10 or more food pictures).
“Almost 190,000 people downloaded the app, The Eatery, between October 2011 and April 2012, but attrition was very high: less than 3% were active users, that is, used the app for more than a week and took 10 or more food pictures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMost common dietary preferences reported by users during first use were "I eat everything" (46.33%) or undefined (42.22%).
“Most common dietary preferences (see Table 2) reported by users during the first use of the app were “I eat everything” (46.33%) or undefined (42.22%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenInitiation of self-monitoring in the middle of the week during daytime and the amount of feedback from peers were connected to higher adherence.
“Moreover, initiation of self-monitoring in the middle of the week during daytime and the amount of feedback from peers were connected to higher adherence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenDifferences in users' ideas about what healthy or fit food is do not seem to have influenced adherence in this study.
“People may also have very different ideas about what healthy or “fit” food is, but these differences do not seem to have influenced adherence in this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMore than half of active users (53%) gave a textual description for their first picture whereas less than one-fifth of non-active users (18%) did so.
“This is supported by the finding that more than half of the active users (53%) gave a textual description for their first picture whereas less than one-fifth of the non-active users (18%) did so.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough active users obtained more comments and likes than those who took only few pictures, the total percentage of pictures with comments (4%) and likes (15%) was quite low.
“Although active users obtained more comments and likes for their pictures from peers than those who took only few pictures, the total percentage of pictures with comments (4%) and likes (15%) was quite low.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsers with strict diets gave 21% of all ratings although only 9% of all users belonged to the strict group.
“They also gave 21% of all ratings, although only 9% of all users belonged to the strict group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Users' self-reported dietary preferences accurately reflect their actual diets.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenAs with most mobile apps, the majority of users tried the dietary self-monitoring app only once.
“As with most mobile apps, the majority of users tried the dietary self-monitoring app only once.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAlthough the difference between the user's own rating and average peer ratings was highest among active users, in practice this difference was very small.
“Although the difference between the user’s own rating and average peer ratings was highest among active users, in practice this difference was very small.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationSelf-monitoring of food intake is a recommended behavioral strategy in weight control and improvement of dietary habits.
“On an individual level, one behavioral strategy recommended in weight control and improvement of dietary habits is self-monitoring of food intake [2,3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] National Institute of Health (NIH)Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report19982013-11-04Bethesda, MDNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutehttp://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/prctgd_c.pdf6KsKK0SU3
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationKnowledge about healthy eating is not sufficient on its own to change eating behavior.
“Knowledge about healthy eating is not sufficient on its own to change eating behavior [1].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Contento, I, 1995, Journal of Nutrition Education
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSmartphones and photography can be used to make self-monitoring easy and convenient.
“Smartphones and photography can be used to make self-monitoring easy and convenient [6-9].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn a free online weight loss program, more frequent weight monitoring was associated with greater weight loss.
“Another study on members of a free online weight loss program found that more frequent weight monitoring was associated with greater weight loss, but no association was found between dietary monitoring frequency and weight loss [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTraditional dietary self-monitoring methods suffer from underreporting and recall issues.
“These methods can be burdensome to people [6,7,15-17] and suffer from underreporting and recall issues [15-19].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIndividualized feedback has been found to be associated with higher adherence to online interventions promoting healthy lifestyles.
“Individualized feedback has been found to be associated with higher adherence to online interventions promoting healthy lifestyles [22,23].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough it is still difficult to estimate food ingredients and portion sizes from a photograph, efforts to develop estimation algorithms based on image processing or crowdsourcing are underway.
“Although it is still difficult to estimate food ingredients and portion sizes from a photograph, efforts to develop estimation algorithms based on image processing or crowdsourcing are underway [6,16].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe duration of the monitoring period has varied from eight weeks to two years in different studies.
“The degree of monitoring is typically reported as the number of food diaries/entries completed per day and/or week, and the duration of the monitoring period has varied from eight weeks to two years in different studies [3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationReviews on Web-based interventions have found that adherence is generally lower outside randomized controlled trials.
“Little research exists about usage behavior of health-promoting apps, but reviews on Web-based interventions have found that adherence is generally lower outside randomized controlled trials and some observational studies have reported adherence rates as low as 1% [29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome observational studies have reported adherence rates as low as 1%.
“Little research exists about usage behavior of health-promoting apps, but reviews on Web-based interventions have found that adherence is generally lower outside randomized controlled trials and some observational studies have reported adherence rates as low as 1% [29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA pilot study using disposable cameras suggests that recording food before eating can lead to increased consideration of dietary habits and alter food choices better than written diaries.
“A pilot study using disposable cameras suggests that recording food before eating can lead to increased consideration of dietary habits and alter food choices better than written diaries [21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTraditional methods for dietary self-monitoring include more or less detailed food diaries and calorie counting.
“Traditional methods for dietary self-monitoring include more or less detailed food diaries and calorie counting [14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Thompson, FE, 2008, Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn a six-month intervention study, greater weight loss was associated with more frequent monitoring.
“For example, a six-month intervention study found that the average number of food records per week was 3.7 and greater weight loss was associated with more frequent monitoring [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn weight loss studies, consistent recording of food intake appears to be one of the most effective methods.
“In weight loss studies, consistent recording of food intake appears to be one of the most effective methods [3,11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFeedback on performance is a self-regulation technique that either reinforces the current behavior or creates a discrepancy between current and ideal behavior.
“Feedback on performance is a self-regulation technique that either reinforces the current behavior or creates a discrepancy between current and ideal behavior [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Carver, CS, 1982, Psychol Bull source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn a free online weight loss program, no association was found between dietary monitoring frequency and weight loss.
“Another study on members of a free online weight loss program found that more frequent weight monitoring was associated with greater weight loss, but no association was found between dietary monitoring frequency and weight loss [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe percentage of food records made within 15 minutes of eating has been found to be associated with weight loss.
“Methods that can minimize the temporal distance between eating and recording food intake are likely to improve outcomes; the percentage of food records made within 15 minutes of eating has been found to be associated with weight loss [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBeyond nutritional assessments, technology can be used to share advice and feedback on healthy eating between users.
“Beyond nutritional assessments, technology can be used to share advice and feedback on healthy eating between users [27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Parker, A, 2012, CHI'12 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIn terms of the content of feedback, encouraging reflection and self-monitoring may be more important than detailed analysis of nutritional contents when the target is to change eating behavior.
“In terms of the content of feedback, encouraging reflection and self-monitoring may be more important than detailed analysis of nutritional contents when the target is to change eating behavior [10,24,25].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMobile apps can provide automated feedback on the healthiness of the food based on the photo and also leverage other users to provide feedback through crowdsourcing.
“Mobile apps can provide automated feedback on the healthiness of the food based on the photo and also leverage other users to provide feedback through crowdsourcing [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDietary self-monitoring prompts people to reflect on their current behavior and compare it to ideal behavior.
“Dietary self-monitoring prompts people to reflect on their current behavior and compare it to ideal behavior [4,10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCapturing images of food may improve adherence and accuracy in some groups, such as among adolescents who may be less motivated to keep detailed food diaries.
“Capturing images of food may improve adherence and accuracy in some groups, such as among adolescents who may be less motivated to keep detailed food diaries [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn a six-month intervention study, the average number of food records per week was 3.7.
“For example, a six-month intervention study found that the average number of food records per week was 3.7 and greater weight loss was associated with more frequent monitoring [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEvaluation of PlateMate suggested that crowd-generated assessments were almost as accurate as those done by professional nutritionists, although pictures containing ambiguous items such as beverages or salad dressing received inaccurate ratings.
“Evaluation of the app suggested that these crowd-generated assessments were almost as accurate as those done by professional nutritionists, although pictures containing ambiguous items such as beverages or salad dressing received inaccurate ratings [26].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Noronha, J, 2011, Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe degree of monitoring is typically reported as the number of food diaries/entries completed per day and/or week.
“The degree of monitoring is typically reported as the number of food diaries/entries completed per day and/or week, and the duration of the monitoring period has varied from eight weeks to two years in different studies [3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataBonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple comparisons, with adjusted significance level P=.0014.
“Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple comparisons and the adjusted significance level was set at P=.0014.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDietary self-monitoring for about 1.5 months would be enough to lead to increased awareness of eating habits and changes in behavior, if done diligently.
“Dietary self-monitoring for this amount of time would be enough to lead to increased awareness of eating habits and changes in behavior, if done diligently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataRegistration time was not available for 1.49% of the users.
“Registration time was not available for 1.49% of the users (2837/189,770).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataChanges in healthiness ratings were analyzed only among Active users who had at least one valid picture among the first two pictures they had taken (99.35% of Actives).
“Changes in healthiness ratings were analyzed only among Active users who had at least one valid picture among the first two pictures they had taken (99.35% of Actives, 4863/4895).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe study found that sessions with apps were short, averaging a little more than a minute.
“The study found that sessions with apps were short, averaging a little more than a minute, and that different types of apps were used during different times of the day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Böhmer, M, 2011, MobileHCI'11 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCommunication apps were the most frequently used, 49.50% of app launches, whereas the proportion of health apps was only 0.26% of all app launches.
“Communication apps were the most frequently used, 49.50% of app launches, whereas the proportion of health apps was only 0.26% of all app launches [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Böhmer, M, 2011, MobileHCI'11 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningGiven the short usage period for the majority of users, many probably tried out the application for fun.
“Given the short usage period for majority of the users, many probably tried out the application for fun.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPeople's eating patterns and daily routines vary over the week.
“Considering that people’s eating patterns and daily routines vary over the week [31,32], analyzing the temporal context of app usage may help identify the best times to start using an app that promotes lifestyle changes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataUsers did not photograph only healthy foods and there was room for improvement.
“Hence, users did not photograph only healthy foods and there was room for improvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The crowdsourced healthiness ratings validly reflect the healthiness of the photographed foods.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe pattern of easy joining and trying out without serious intention or commitment is similar to most free apps.
“This is similar to most free apps, which are easy to join and try out even if there is no serious intention or commitment to start using the app [13,25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe positive trend among some users could also mean that they started gaming the system by selectively photographing their foods to get better ratings and comments.
“Thus, the positive trend among some users could also mean that they started “gaming the system” by selectively photographing their foods to get better ratings and comments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThe Eatery was not marketed as a weight loss app but as a method to eat healthier (Stop counting calories, start eating better).
“The Eatery was not marketed as a weight loss app but instead as a method to eat healthier (“Stop counting calories, start eating better”), and hence may have attracted a large number of users with no real interest in dietary improvements and thus lacking motivation for dietary self-monitoring.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe Eatery may have attracted a large number of users with no real interest in dietary improvements and thus lacking motivation for dietary self-monitoring.
“The Eatery was not marketed as a weight loss app but instead as a method to eat healthier (“Stop counting calories, start eating better”), and hence may have attracted a large number of users with no real interest in dietary improvements and thus lacking motivation for dietary self-monitoring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe proportion of users who had downloaded the app less than one week before the sampling period ended was 2.01%, and they were still included in the analyses due to their small number.
“The proportion of users who had downloaded the app less than one week before the sampling period ended (on March 28, 2012 or later) was 2.01% (3812/189,770). Hence, they could not be classified as Actives. They were still included in the analyses due to their small number.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataImprovers used the app for a longer time and did dietary self-monitoring more frequently than other Actives.
“In other words, they used the app for a longer time and did dietary self-monitoring more frequently.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOne of the few articles published about mobile app usage examined data that was collected from 4125 users between August 2010 and January 2011.
“One of the few articles published about mobile app usage examined data that was collected from 4125 users between August 2010 and January 2011 [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Böhmer, M, 2011, MobileHCI'11 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataPictures with fewer than 10 ratings were excluded as invalid, based on manual inspection.
“By manual inspection, the threshold of a valid picture was adjusted to 10 ratings: if the first picture taken by a user had received less than 10 ratings, the picture information was excluded and the second picture was used instead.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDifferent types of apps were used during different times of the day.
“The study found that sessions with apps were short, averaging a little more than a minute, and that different types of apps were used during different times of the day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Böhmer, M, 2011, MobileHCI'11 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe overall quality and content of the pictures was screened by the researchers by examining a random sample of pictures.
“The overall quality and content of the pictures was screened by the researchers by examining a random sample of pictures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPractical advice for healthy eating could have been given by formation of implementation intentions through if-then planning, which has been shown to increase effectiveness of healthy eating interventions.
“Practical advice for healthy eating could also have been given by formation of implementation intentions through if-then planning, which has been shown to increase effectiveness of healthy eating interventions [10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe most significant limitation of the study is the lack of information about user demographics, behavioral outcomes, and initial motives.
“The most significant limitation of the study is the lack of information about user demographics, behavioral outcomes, and initial motives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGeneral statistics about smartphone users in early 2012 suggest that iPhone users were slightly older than Android users and downloaded more apps in a month than users of other smartphone systems.
“The general statistics about smartphone users in early 2012 suggest that iPhone users were slightly older than Android users and downloaded more apps in a month than users of other smartphone systems [37].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Alexander A2014-03-31Smartphone usage statistics 2012 (infographic)http://ansonalex.com/infographics/smartphone-usage-statistics-2012-infographic/6OTvN95oZ
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCrowdsourced ratings can be biased, resulting from cultural differences or the rater's own food preferences.
“Crowdsourced ratings can be biased, resulting from cultural differences [26] or rater’s own food preferences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Noronha, J, 2011, Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDietary decisions are often unconscious and affected by environmental factors more than people believe.
“Dietary decisions are often unconscious and affected by environmental factors more than people believe [39].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataEven though the app reached a large number of people, its actual impact among users remained small because most did not even start dietary self-monitoring with the app.
“Even though the findings show that the app reached a large number of people, its actual impact among users remained small because most did not even start dietary self-monitoring with the app.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningImplementing these techniques could have given users a more specific purpose for using the app.
“Implementing these techniques could have given users a more specific purpose for using the app.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe app did not prompt users to set specific goals or review behavioral goals and only implicitly prompted intention formation (eat healthy).
“The app did not prompt users to set specific goals or review behavioral goals and only implicitly prompted intention formation (“eat healthy”).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn this study, the location information of where the pictures were taken was available but was not exploited.
“In this study, the location information of where the pictures were taken was available, but was not exploited, although dietary behaviors are likely to be linked with locations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior studies have found that diet quality is generally poorer during weekends than on weekdays and calorie intake is higher, especially in the form of fat and alcohol.
“Prior studies have found that diet quality is generally poorer during weekends than on weekdays and calorie intake is higher, especially in the form of fat and alcohol [31,32,35]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe app utilized self-regulation techniques of self-monitoring and feedback but lacked other techniques derived from control theory.
“Finally, the app utilized self-regulation techniques of self-monitoring and feedback, but lacked other techniques derived from control theory [4,5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBecause a higher proportion of active users first used the app during weekdays and daytime, the food they chose to photograph first was probably their workday lunch, which is often healthier than foods eaten during weekends.
“Because a higher proportion of active users also used the app for the first time during weekdays and daytime, the food that they chose to photograph first was probably their workday lunch, which is often healthier than foods that are eaten during weekends [35].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe app did not implement all self-regulation techniques that could have strengthened its impact and it lacked means to track changes in eating behavior systematically.
“Still, the app did not implement all self-regulation techniques that could have strengthened its impact and it lacked means to track changes in eating behavior systematically.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe association between outcomes and adherence to dietary self-monitoring has been found to differ between race and gender groups in weight loss interventions.
“the association between outcomes and adherence to dietary self-monitoring has been found to differ between race and gender groups in weight loss interventions [12]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThe app itself did not offer explicit advice on what to do to improve eating habits or what constitutes a healthy diet.
“The app itself did not offer explicit advice on what to do to improve eating habits or what constitutes a healthy diet.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis could mean that this kind of application attracts users with special diets and/or those interested in food.
“This could mean that this kind of an application attracts users with special diets and/or those interested in food.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIf people used the app as intended for dietary self-monitoring on a regular basis, they could experience some benefits through heightened awareness of their eating habits.
“If people would use the app as intended for dietary self-monitoring on a regular basis, they could experience some benefits through heightened awareness of their eating habits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningUsers did not photograph everything they ate, so there is no way of knowing how healthily people ate in general and whether the observed positive trend in healthiness ratings among 10% of active users meant anything in practice.
“Moreover, users did not photograph everything they ate so there is no way of knowing how healthily people ate in general and whether the observed positive trend in healthiness ratings among 10% of active users meant anything in practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSomeone who downloads a healthy eating app in the middle of the week during daytime probably has the intention to start keeping track of their eating.
“In contrast, someone who downloads a healthy eating app in the middle of the week during daytime probably has the intention to start keeping track of their eating.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt is possible that users with strict diets were already most interested in healthy eating.
“Hence, it is possible that users with strict diets were already most interested in healthy eating.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPortion size estimation is difficult even when measurement aids are present in the picture.
“Portion size estimation is difficult even when measurement aids are present in the picture [18,19,38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe timing of initial use of the dietary self-monitoring app may be important both for users' pre-existing motivation and the type of reinforcing feedback generated by the app.
“Hence, the timing of the initial use of the dietary self-monitoring app may be important both in terms of the users’ pre-existing motivation and the type of reinforcing feedback generated by the app.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe social network formed in this way is very loose: users neither know whose pictures they rate nor who rates their pictures.
“The social network formed in such a way is very loose: users neither know whose pictures they rate nor have any knowledge of who rates their pictures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenSome updates were released to the app during the six-month data collection; they consisted of minor modifications and fixes to the user interface and were not included in the analyses since the main features and functions remained the same.
“Some updates were released to the app during the six-month timeframe of data collection. These updates consisted of minor modification and fixes in the user interface of the app. They may have had a minor influence on the user experience of the app, but they were not included in the analyses since the main features and functions remained the same.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIf users are merely told that their meal is unhealthy but not given advice on how to make it better, they do not get enough value out of the experience and subsequently lack motivation to continue using the app.
“It may be that if users are merely told that their meal is unhealthy but not given any advice on what to do to make it better, they do not get enough value out of the experience and subsequently lack motivation to continue using the app [36].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationEngaging in giving ratings for a long time might require an existing community or formation of stronger ties between users.
“However, engaging in this activity for a long time might require an existing community or formation of stronger ties between users [27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Parker, A, 2012, CHI'12 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOne explanation for participation in giving ratings is reciprocity: when a user rates someone else's pictures, they also get ratings for their own.
“One explanation is the reciprocity of the action: when a user rates someone else’s pictures, they also get ratings for their own.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationUsers of The Eatery owned an iPhone, so it is possible that their characteristics followed the same pattern as other iPhone users.
“Users of The Eatery owned an iPhone so it is possible that their characteristics followed the same pattern.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe middle of the week during daytime could be a fruitful time to suggest initiation of lifestyle changes.
“This time period could also be a fruitful time to suggest initiation of lifestyle changes, although everyone does not have the same work schedules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not known whether such mobile apps for independent use would engage people and reach those who could benefit the most from dietary monitoring.
“However, it is not known whether such mobile apps for independent use would engage people and reach those who could benefit the most from dietary monitoring.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not clear how consistent self-monitoring needs to be for the method to be effective.
“Yet it is not clear how consistent self-monitoring needs to be for the method to be effective.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not clear whether results tell more about an individual’s engagement to the program or specifically about the effect of monitoring.
“Overall, it is not clear whether these results tell more about an individual’s engagement to the program or specifically about the effect of monitoring.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Studies have mostly focused on weight loss, not on prevention of weight gain through improvement of eating behavior.
“Studies have also mostly focused on weight loss, not on prevention of weight gain through improvement of eating behavior.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Little research exists about usage behavior of health-promoting apps.
“Little research exists about usage behavior of health-promoting apps, but reviews on Web-based interventions have found that adherence is generally lower outside randomized controlled trials and some observational studies have reported adherence rates as low as 1% [29].”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Most users were from Anglo-American culture.
“These time intervals were chosen to correspond to the natural periods of the day and based on the assumption that most users were from Anglo-American culture, since the app was in English and roughly 68% (127,884/186,933) of the users registered from the main US time zones.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The positive trend in healthiness ratings among some users reflects changes in their real-life eating behavior.
“Even if we assume that this trend reflects changes in their real-life eating behavior, the impact of the app on eating choices (or choosing which foods to record) appears to have been very small.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The crowdsourced healthiness ratings validly reflect the healthiness of the photographed foods.
“The average healthiness rating of all pictures was 0.58, slightly above the midpoint on the scale of 0 (“fat”) to 1 (“fit”).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Users' self-reported dietary preferences accurately reflect their actual diets.
“Users who reported a “strict” diet (low fat, low/no carbs, or vegan/vegetarian) were most likely to become active users.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The comparatively higher attrition rate in pure online intervention studies was also evident in this review, where the blended group scored higher in the risk of bias assessment regarding withdrawals and dropouts compared to the online group.
“Generally, the comparatively higher attrition rate in pure online intervention studies (84–88) was also evident in this review where the blended group scored higher in the risk of bias assessment regarding withdrawals and dropouts compared to the online group.”
From Digital resilience interventions for healthcare workers: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [85]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredUse is not a given for healthcare apps.
“Furthermore, use is not a given for healthcare apps.”
From Uptake and usage of IntelliCare: A publicly available suite of mental health and well-being apps (2016) · cites this paper as Helander et al. (2014)
Only 13.6% of people who downloaded the app in Helander's study used the core functionality (taking a picture) more than once.
“Only 13.6% people who downloaded the app in Helander's study used the core functionality (taking a picture) more than once.”
From Uptake and usage of IntelliCare: A publicly available suite of mental health and well-being apps (2016) · cites this paper as Helander et al. (2014)
Even the largest group of users deemed "semi-active" (11% of total users) only used the app for an average of 9.3 days.
“Even the largest group of users deemed “semi-active” (11% of total users) only used the app for an average of 9.3 days.”
From Uptake and usage of IntelliCare: A publicly available suite of mental health and well-being apps (2016) · cites this paper as Helander et al. (2014)
Many individuals who download a commercially developed health management app never use the app.
“As illustrated by Helander et al. (2014), many individuals who download a commercially developed health management app never use the app.”
From Uptake and usage of IntelliCare: A publicly available suite of mental health and well-being apps (2016) · cites this paper as Helander et al. (2014)
The initial engagement numbers represent an early snapshot, in contrast to other reports that have analyzed 100,000s of users over longer periods of time.
“while these initial engagement numbers are encouraging, they represent an early snapshot, in contrast to other reports that have analyzed 100,000′s of users over longer periods of time (Muñoz et al., 2015, Helander et al., 2014).”
From Uptake and usage of IntelliCare: A publicly available suite of mental health and well-being apps (2016) · cites this paper as Helander et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Abstract reverses the chi-square results for comments and likes
MinorThe abstract assigns χ2=343.6 to comments and χ2=909.6 to likes, respectively. Table 7 assigns 343.6 to likes and 909.6 to comments.
“Actives were more likely to have at least one comment or one “like” for their pictures than Semi-actives or Non-actives (χ2 2=343.6, P<.001, and χ2 2=909.6, P<.001, respectively).”
“| Having at least one like, n (%) | 2031 (6.22%) | 1792 (8.67%) | 647 (13.30%) | χ2 2=343.6, P<.001 | All groups |”
Semi-active definition omits short-term users with 10 or more pictures
MinorThe abstract limits Semi-actives to users with 2-9 pictures. Table 3 also includes users with at least 10 pictures whose usage period was shorter than seven days.
“Users with 2-9 pictures as “Semi-actives””
“| Users | Semi-actives | At least two valid pictures and less than 10 pictures or usage period shorter than 7 days | 20,926 (11.03%) | 4.1 (3.7) | 9.3 (19.2) |”
Cites
(1998) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e565682010-001 · Cited by 9,452 · see citing works
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.92.1.111 · Cited by 2,650 · see citing works
Eysenbach, G. (2005) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11 · Cited by 2,524 · see citing works
Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: A meta-regression.
Michie, S., Abraham, C., Whittington, C., McAteer, J., & Gupta, S. (2009) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016136 · Cited by 2,229 · see citing works
Persuasive System Design Does Matter: a Systematic Review of Adherence to Web-based Interventions
Kelders, S. M., Kok, R. N., Ossebaard, H. C., & Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2104 · Cited by 1,308 · see citing works
Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature
Burke, L. E., Wang, J., & Sevick, M. A. (2011) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2010.10.008 · Cited by 1,203 · see citing works
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS THAT INCREASE THE FOOD INTAKE AND CONSUMPTION VOLUME OF UNKNOWING CONSUMERS
Wansink, B. (2004) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132140 · Cited by 1,036 · see citing works
Self-citationHealthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions
Klasnja, P., & Pratt, W. (2012) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.017 · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Böhmer, M., Hecht, B., Schöning, J., Krüger, A., & Bauer, G. (2011) · Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services · doi:10.1145/2037373.2037383 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Brouwer, W., Kroeze, W., Crutzen, R., de Nooijer, J., de Vries, N. K., Brug, J., & Oenema, A. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1639 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Reflective and Automatic Processes in the Initiation and Maintenance of Dietary Change
Rothman, A. J., Sheeran, P., & Wood, W. (2009) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9118-3 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
The Use of Mobile Devices in Aiding Dietary Assessment and Evaluation
Zhu, F., Bosch, M., Woo, I., Kim, S., Boushey, C. J., Ebert, D. S., & Delp, E. J. (2010) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2010.2051471 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Need for Technological Innovation in Dietary Assessment
Thompson, F. E., Subar, A. F., Loria, C. M., Reedy, J. L., & Baranowski, T. (2010) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.008 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Cugelman, B., Thelwall, M., & Dawes, P. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1367 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Weight loss during the intensive intervention phase of the weight-loss maintenance trial
Hollis, J. F., Gullion, C. M., Stevens, V. J., Brantley, P. J., Appel, L. J., Ard, J. D., Champagne, C. M., Dalcin, A., Erlinger, T. P., Funk, K., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.013 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Nutrition in the prevention and treatment of disease
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2123 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Use of technology in children’s dietary assessment
Boushey, C. J., Kerr, D. A., Wright, J., Lutes, K. D., Ebert, D. S., & Delp, E. J. (2009) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/ejcn.2008.65 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Subar, A. F., Crafts, J., Zimmerman, T. P., Wilson, M., Mittl, B., Islam, N. G., McNutt, S., Potischman, N., Buday, R., Hull, S. G., et al. (2010) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.007 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Weekend Eating in the United States Is Linked with Greater Energy, Fat, and Alcohol Intake
Haines, P. S., Hama, M. Y., Guilkey, D. K., & Popkin, B. M. (2003) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2003.130 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Daugherty, B. L., Schap, T. E., Ettienne-Gittens, R., Zhu, F. M., Bosch, M., Delp, E. J., Ebert, D. S., Kerr, D. A., & Boushey, C. J. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1967 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Helsel, D. L., Jakicic, J. M., & Otto, A. D. (2007) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2007.07.014 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Context and mobile services' value-in-use
Gummerus, J., & Pihlström, M. (2011) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.07.002 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Eating routines. Embedded, value based, modifiable, and reflective
Jastran, M. M., Bisogni, C. A., Sobal, J., Blake, C., & Devine, C. M. (2009) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.09.003 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Frobisher, C., & Maxwell, S. M. (2003) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1046/j.1365-277x.2003.00434.x · Cited by 151 · see citing works
New technology in dietary assessment: a review of digital methods in improving food record accuracy
Stumbo, P. J. (2013) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665112002911 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
Miller, R., Benko, H., & Latulipe, C. (2012) · doi:10.1145/2380116 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Using instrumented paper diaries to document self-monitoring patterns in weight loss
Burke, L. E., Sereika, S. M., Music, E., Warziski, M., Styn, M. A., & Stone, A. (2008) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2007.07.004 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Influence of Weekend Lifestyle Patterns on Body Weight
Racette, S. B., Weiss, E. P., Schechtman, K. B., Steger‐May, K., Villareal, D. T., Obert, K. A., Holloszy, J. O., & Washington University School of Medicine CALERIE Team (2008) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2008.320 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Zepeda, L., & Deal, D. (2008) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00725.x · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Portion size estimation and expectation of accuracy
Hernández, T., Wilder, L., Kuehn, D., Rubotzky, K., Moser-Veillon, P., Godwin, S., Thompson, C., & Wang, C. (2006) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2006.02.010 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Improving Dietary Self-Monitoring and Adherence with Hand-Held Computers: A Pilot Study
Glanz, K., Murphy, S., Moylan, J., Evensen, D., & Curb, J. D. (2006) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-20.3.165 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Health promotion as activism: building community capacity to effect social change
Parker, A., Kantroo, V., Lee, H. R., Osornio, M., Sharma, M., & Grinter, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2207692 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Collection and Visualization of Dietary Behavior and Reasons for Eating Using Twitter
Hingle, M. D., Yoon, D., Fowler, J. J., Kobourov, S., Schneider, M. L., Falk, D., & Burd, R. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2613 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Lee, C. D., Chae, J., Schap, T. E., Kerr, D. A., Delp, E. J., Ebert, D. S., & Boushey, C. J. (2012) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681200600231 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Hwang, K. O., Ning, J., Trickey, A. W., & Sciamanna, C. N. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2195 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Weekly patterns, diet quality and energy balance
McCarthy, S. (2014) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.02.046 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Journal of nutrition education
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92221-7 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1016/s00057894(05)80212-6 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perski, O., Blandford, A., West, R., & Michie, S. (2017) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1 · Cited by 1,193 · see citing works
The emerging field of mobile health
Steinhubl, S. R., Muse, E. D., & Topol, E. J. (2015) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3487 · Cited by 822 · see citing works
Meyerowitz-Katz, G., Ravi, S., Arnolda, L., Feng, X., Maberly, G., & Astell-Burt, T. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/20283 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Jakob, R., Harperink, S., Rudolf, A. M., Fleisch, E., Haug, S., Mair, J. L., Salamanca-Sanabria, A., & Kowatsch, T. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/35371 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
IntelliCare: An Eclectic, Skills-Based App Suite for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety
Mohr, D. C., Tomasino, K. N., Lattie, E. G., Palac, H. L., Kwasny, M. J., Weingardt, K., Karr, C. J., Kaiser, S. M., Rossom, R. C., Bardsley, L. R., et al. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6645 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Cordeiro, F., Epstein, D. A., Thomaz, E., Bales, E., Jagannathan, A. K., Abowd, G. D., & Fogarty, J. A. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702155 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Sawesi, S., Rashrash, M., Phalakornkule, K., Carpenter, J. S., & Jones, J. (2016) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/medinform.4514 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Continuance intention of online technologies: A systematic literature review
Yan, M., Filieri, R., & Gorton, M. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102315 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
The Pace of Technologic Change
Patrick, K., Hekler, E. B., Estrin, D., Mohr, D. C., Riper, H., Crane, D., Godino, J., & Riley, W. T. (2016) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.001 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Direito, A., Jiang, Y., Whittaker, R., & Maddison, R. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4568 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Mobile apps for healthy living: Factors influencing continuance intention for health apps
Yan, M., Filieri, R., Raguseo, E., & Gorton, M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120644 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Jacob, C., Sezgın, E., Sánchez-Vázquez, A., & Ivory, C. J. (2022) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/36284 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Lee, H. E., & Cho, J. (2016) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1167998 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Leung, L., & Chen, C. (2019) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2019.01.005 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., Barre, L. K., & Bartels, S. J. (2015) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2014.0105 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Hilliard, M. E., Hahn, A. L., Ridge, A. K., Eakin, M. N., & Riekert, K. A. (2014) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.3599 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Devices for Self-Monitoring Sedentary Time or Physical Activity: A Scoping Review
Sanders, J. P., Loveday, A., Pearson, N., Edwardson, C. L., Yates, T. E., Biddle, S., & Esliger, D. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5373 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Digital Health Promotion and Prevention in Settings: Scoping Review
Stark, A. L., Geukes, C., & Dockweiler, C. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/21063 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Uptake and usage of IntelliCare: A publicly available suite of mental health and well-being apps
Lattie, E. G., Schueller, S. M., Sargent, E., Stiles-Shields, C., Tomasino, K. N., Corden, M. E., Begale, M., Karr, C. J., & Mohr, D. C. (2016) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2016.06.003 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Impact of Pokémon Go on Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Khamzina, M., Parab, K. V., An, R., Bullard, T., & Grigsby‐Toussaint, D. S. (2019) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2019.09.005 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Theoretical Advancements in mHealth: A Systematic Review of Mobile Apps
Chib, A., & Lin, S. H. (2018) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2018.1544676 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Mummah, S. A., Robinson, T. N., Mathur, M. B., Farzinkhou, S., Sutton, S. R., & Gardner, C. D. (2017) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0563-2 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Crane, D., Garnett, C., Brown, J., West, R., & Michie, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2017.00039 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Describing the Process of Adopting Nutrition and Fitness Apps: Behavior Stage Model Approach
König, L. M., Sproesser, G., Schupp, H. T., & Renner, B. (2018) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.8261 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Peer-Based Social Media Features in Behavior Change Interventions: Systematic Review
Elaheebocus, R., Weal, M. J., Morrison, L. G., & Yardley, L. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8342 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Wang, T., Wang, W., Liang, J., Nuo, M., Wen, Q., Wei, W., Han, H., & Lei, J. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00692-9 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Who Is Still Playing Pokémon Go? A Web-Based Survey
Rasche, P., Schlomann, A., & Mertens, A. (2017) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/games.7197 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Turner‐McGrievy, G. M., Dunn, C. G., Wilcox, S., Boutté, A. K., Hutto, B., Hoover, A. W., & Muth, E. R. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2019.03.012 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Zhang, X., Guo, X., Ho, S. Y., Lai, K., & Vogel, D. (2020) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2020.103312 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
The Use of Smartphone Fitness Applications: The Role of Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation
Vinnikova, A., Lu, L., Wei, J., Fang, G., & Yan, J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17207639 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Review of researches on smartphone applications for physical activity promotion in healthy adults
Jee, H. (2017) · Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation · doi:10.12965/jer.1732928.464 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
iHear Food: Eating Detection Using Commodity Bluetooth Headsets
Gao, Y., Zhang, N., Wang, H., Ding, X., Ye, X., Chen, G., & Cao, Y. (2016) · 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE) · doi:10.1109/chase.2016.14 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Rubanovich, C. K., Mohr, D. C., & Schueller, S. M. (2017) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.7603 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Smartphone applications to support weight loss: current perspectives
Pellegrini, C. A., Pfammatter, A. F., Conroy, D. E., & Spring, B. J. (2015) · Advanced Health Care Technologies · doi:10.2147/ahct.s57844 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Cheung, K., Ling, W., Karr, C. J., Weingardt, K. R., Schueller, S. M., & Mohr, D. C. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocy023 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Khan, S., Dasrath, F., Farghaly, S., Otobo, E. O., Riaz, M. S., Rogers, J., Castillo, A. G., & Atreja, A. (2015) · Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · doi:10.9734/bjmmr/2016/21884 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Gratitude facilitates healthy eating behavior in adolescents and young adults
Fritz, M. M., Armenta, C. N., Walsh, L. C., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.011 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Mummah, S. A., Mathur, M., King, A. C., Gardner, C. D., & Sutton, S. (2016) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.5146 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Chen, E., Prakash, S., Reddi, V. J., Kim, D. A., & Rajpurkar, P. (2023) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-023-01115-0 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Dietary Self-Monitoring in Weight Management: Current Evidence on Efficacy and Adherence
Yu, Z., Sealey‐Potts, C., & Rodriguez, J. C. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2015.04.005 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Maringer, M., Veer, P. V., Klepacz, N. A., Verain, M. C. D., Normann, A., Ekman, S., Timotijević, L., Raats, M. M., & Geelen, A. (2018) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/s12937-018-0366-6 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Pfammatter, A. F., Mitsos, A., Wang, S. D., Hood, S. H., & Spring, B. J. (2017) · mHealth · doi:10.21037/mhealth.2017.09.02 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Jacob, C., Lindeque, J. P., Klein, A., Ivory, C. J., Heuss, S., & Peter, M. K. (2023) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/45143 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Westbrook, J. I., & Baysari, M. T. (2015) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.15265/iy-2015-011 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Armand, T. P. T., Kim, H., & Kim, J.-I. (2024) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14030254 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Zhou, X., Wei, X., Cheng, A., Liu, Z., Su, Z., Li, J., Qin, R., Zhao, L., Xie, Y., Huang, Z., et al. (2023) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/48253 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Kim, J. Y., Wineinger, N. E., Taitel, M., Radin, J. M., Akinbosoye, O., Jiang, J., Nikzad, N., Orr, G., Topol, E., & Steinhubl, S. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6371 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
When and Why Adults Abandon Lifestyle Behavior and Mental Health Mobile Apps: Scoping Review
Kidman, P. G., Curtis, R., Watson, A., & Maher, C. A. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/56897 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Tonkin, E., Brimblecombe, J. K., & Wycherley, T. P. (2017) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.116.013748 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Wessels, N. J., Hulshof, L., Loohuis, A. M. M., van Gemert‐Pijnen, J. E. W. C., Jellema, P., van der Worp, H., & Blanker, M. H. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/17114 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Tonkin, E., Jeffs, L., Wycherley, T. P., Maher, C. A., Smith, R., Hart, J., Cubillo, B., & Brimblecombe, J. K. (2017) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.8651 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Flaherty, S. J., McCarthy, M. B., Collins, A., McCafferty, C., & McAuliffe, F. M. (2021) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-06-2019-0531 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Mobile-Based Interventions for Dietary Behavior Change and Health Outcomes: Scoping Review
Kankanhalli, A., Shin, J., & Oh, H. (2018) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/11312 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Multimedia Data-Based Mobile Applications for Dietary Assessment
Vasiloglou, M. F., Marcano, I., Lizama, S., Papathanail, I., Spanakis, E. K., & Mougiakakou, S. G. (2022) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968221085026 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Harjumaa, M., Absetz, P., Ermes, M., Mattila, E., Männikkö, R., Tilles‐Tirkkonen, T., Lintu, N., Schwab, U., Umer, A., Leppänen, J., et al. (2020) · JMIR Diabetes · doi:10.2196/15219 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
A Model of Socially Sustained Self-Tracking for Food and Diet
Lu, X., Chen, Y., & Epstein, D. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479595 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Jung, J., Wellard‐Cole, L., Cai, C., Koprinska, I., Yacef, K., Allman-Farinelli, M. A., & Kay, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3397327 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Yang, S., Cha, M.-J., van Kessel, R., Warrier, G., Thrul, J., Lee, M., Yoon, J., Kang, D., & Cho, J. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/71349 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Minen, M. T., Jaran, J., Boyers, T., & Corner, S. E. (2020) · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.13851 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Min, H., Li, J., Di, M., Huang, S., Sun, X., Li, T., & Wu, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348673 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Berglind, D., Yacamán-Méndez, D., Lavebratt, C., & Forsell, Y. (2019) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/14615 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Valcarce-Torrente, M., Sanchis, V. J., Gallardo, L., Fernández, J. G., & Planas, A. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph181910393 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Stecher, C. D., Sullivan, M., & Huberty, J. (2021) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/32794 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Nutrition‐Related Mobile Application for Daily Dietary Self‐Monitoring
Ulfa, M., Setyonugroho, W., Lestari, T. P., Widiasih, E., & Quoc, A. N. (2022) · Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1155/2022/2476367 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Patient-Generated Health Photos and Videos Across Health and Well-being Contexts: Scoping Review
Ploderer, B., Rezaei Aghdam, A., & Burns, K. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/28867 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Leung, W. K. S., Law, S. P.-M., Cheung, M. L., Chang, M. K., Lai, C. Y., & Liu, N. (2024) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-02-2024-0327 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Garnett, C. V., Perski, O., Michie, S., West, R., Field, M., Kaner, E., Munafo, M. R., Greaves, F., Hickman, M., Burton, R., et al. (2021) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.51416.1 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
da Silva, V. C., Gorgulho, B. M., Marchioni, D. M. L., Matos, S. M. A., Giatti, L., de Araújo, T. A., Alonso, A. C., Santos, I. S., Lotufo, P. A., & Benseñor, I. M. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192214934 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Waalen, J., Peters, M., Ranamukhaarachchi, D. G., Li, J., Ebner, G. S., Senkowsky, J., Topol, E. J., & Steinhubl, S. R. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215468 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Assessing Pictograph Recognition: A Comparison of Crowdsourcing and Traditional Survey Approaches
Kuang, J.-Q., Argo, L., Stoddard, G., Bray, B., & Zeng-Treitler, Q. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4582 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Trade-off between Automation and Accuracy in Mobile Photo Recognition Food Logging
Lim, B. Y., Chng, X., & Zhao, S. (2017) · International Symposium of Chinese CHI (Chinese CHI) · doi:10.1145/3080631.3080640 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Tailored Daily Activity: An Adaptive Physical Activity Smartphone Intervention
Direito, A., Tooley, M., Hinbarji, M., Albatal, R., Jiang, Y., Whittaker, R., & Maddison, R. (2019) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2019.0034 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Sharma, S. P., & Hoover, A. W. (2022) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering9020070 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Web-Based Surveillance of Public Information Needs for Informing Preconception Interventions
D’Ambrosio, A., Agricola, E., Russo, L., Gesualdo, F., Pandolfi, E., Bortolus, R., Castellani, C., Lalatta, F., Mastroiacovo, P., & Tozzi, A. E. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122551 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Personalized Policy Learning Using Longitudinal Mobile Health Data
Hu, X., Qian, M., Cheng, B., & Cheung, Y. K. (2020) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2020.1785476 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Oser, M. L., Wallace, M. L., Solano, F. X., & Szigethy, E. (2018) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/11981 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Incorporating Consumers’ Needs in Nutrition Apps to Promote and Maintain Use: Mixed Methods Study
van der Haar, S., Raaijmakers, I., Verain, M. C. D., & Meijboom, S. (2023) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/39515 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Conceptual Modeling in Human Resource Management: A Design Research Approach
Saarlandes, U. D., Strohmeier, S., & Röhrs, F. (2017) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00088 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Digital resilience interventions for healthcare workers: a systematic review
Larsson, M., Ho, D. M., Kirschner, M., Seifritz, E., & Manoliu, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1519670 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Predicting early user churn in a public digital weight loss intervention
Jakob, R., Lepper, N., Fleisch, E., & Kowatsch, T. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642321 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Weight Loss Following Use of a Smartphone Food Photo Feature: Retrospective Cohort Study
Neriah, D. B., & Geliebter, A. (2019) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/11917 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Bedri, A., Liang, Y., Boovaraghavan, S., Kaufman, G. F., & Goel, M. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3490099.3511154 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Mensinger, J. L., Weissinger, G., Cantrell, M. A., Baskin, R., & George, C. (2024) · Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback · doi:10.1007/s10484-024-09621-w · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Sampat, B. H., Behl, A., Gurgaon, M., & Raj, S. (2023) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00188 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Evaluating Consumer m-Health Services for Promoting Healthy Eating: A Randomized Field Experiment.
Kato-Lin, Y.-C., Padman, R., Downs, J. S., & Abhishek, V. (2015) · PubMed Central · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Economou, D., Dwek, M. V., Roberston, C., Elliott, B., Kounenis, T., Azimi, T., Ramezanian, M., & Bell, N. (2017) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · doi:10.1109/cbms.2017.164 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Das, S. K., Bukhari, A. S., Taetzsch, A., Ernst, A. K., Rogers, G. T., Gilhooly, C. H., Hatch‐McChesney, A., Blanchard, C. M., Livingston, K. A., Silver, R. E., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqab259 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Nwolise, C. H., Carey, N., & Shawe, J. (2021) · Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.1007/s41666-021-00104-9 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Using mobile meditation app data to predict future app engagement: an observational study
Fowers, R., Berardi, V., Huberty, J., & Stecher, C. D. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac169 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Turner‐McGrievy, G. M., Wilcox, S., Kaczynski, A. T., Spruijt‐Metz, D., Hutto, B., Muth, E. R., & Hoover, A. W. (2016) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/2055207616657212 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
An intelligent crowd-worker selection approach for reliable content labeling of food images
Rabbi, M., Costa, J. M. D. R., Okeke, F., Schachere, M., Zhang, M., & Choudhury, T. (2015) · Wireless Health · doi:10.1145/2811780.2811955 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Mutsai, T., & Coleman, E. C. (2019) · South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists · doi:10.1145/3351108.3351116 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Influencia de una app en la adherencia a la práctica deportiva: protocolo de estudio
Valcarce-Torrente, M., & Rico, C. D. (2018) · e-Motion Revista de Educación Motricidad e Investigación · doi:10.33776/remo.v0i11.3416 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Jakob, R., Narauskas, J., Fleisch, E., König, L. M., & Kowatsch, T. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100445 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Preventive Nutrition: From Public to Personal Recommendations and Approaches to Behavior Change
Folta, S. C., Brown, A. G. M., & Blumberg, J. B. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22431-2_1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Nutritional Monitoring in Older People Prevention Services
Nagarajan, B., Khatun, R., Bolaños, M., Aguilar, E., Angelini, L., Kamali, M. E., Mugellini, E., Khaled, O. A., Boqué, N., Tarro, L., et al. (2021) · Research for development · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72663-8_5 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Wisdom of the IoT Crowd: Envisioning a Smart Home-based Nutritional Intake Monitoring System
Faltaous, S., Janzon, S., Heger, R., Strauss, M. D., Golkar, P., Viefhaus, M., Prochazka, M., Gruenefeld, U., & Schneegaß, S. (2021) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3473856.3474009 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Rabbi, M., Philyaw-Kotov, M. L., Li, J., Li, K. T., Rothman, B., Giragosian, L., Reyes, M., Gadway, H., Cunningham, R. M., Bonar, E. E., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.13545 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Inagaki, S., Kato, K., Matsuda, T., Abe, K., Kurebayashi, S., Mihara, M., Azuma, D., Takabe, M., Abe, Y., & Yasuda, H. (2025) · Technology and Health Care · doi:10.1177/09287329251332454 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Helander, E., Kaipainen, K., Korhonen, I., & Wansink, B.
- Affiliations
- Tampere University of Technology (FI)
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Helander, Elina
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2014-04-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e109
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4004142
- OpenAlex
- W2038327808
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 27.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Tekes (1104/10)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- mobile health apps, dietary self-monitoring, peer feedback, app adherence, healthy eating interventions, food preferences, behaviour change techniques, free apps, dietary behavior change
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Patient Dropouts, Peer Group, Photography, Retrospective Studies, Self Care, Mobile Applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review