Cited by 50Nutrition and Health in AgingNutrition and Health StudiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Contribution of Snacking to Older Adults' Vitamin, Carotenoid, and Mineral Intakes

Zizza, Claire A., Arsiwalla, Dilbur D., Ellison, Kathy Jo·2010·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

Decreased food and beverage consumption among older adults can lead to inadequate intakes of energy and numerous micronutrients. Although older adults are prone to having inadequate diets, little research attention has been directed at their dietary behaviors, such as snacking. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between snacking frequency and older adults' daily intakes of vitamins, carotenoids, and minerals. Cross-sectional data for 2,056 older adults (65 years and older) from the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used for this study. Dietary data were collected through two 24-hour dietary recall interviews. Participants' snacking occasions and daily nutrient intakes were averaged during the two 24-hour recalls. Using linear regression models to adjust for multiple covariates, mean vitamin, carotenoid, and mineral intakes by snacking category were estimated. As snacking frequency increased, daily intakes of vitamins A, C, and E and beta carotene increased. Older adults' daily intakes of magnesium, copper, and potassium also increased as snacking frequency increased. As older adults' snacking frequency increased, their daily intake of selenium decreased, and their snacking frequency was not associated with their daily intakes of the B-complex vitamins, vitamin K, lycopene, phosphorus, iron, and zinc. Providing healthy snacks on a regular basis has practical implications for institutions, centers, or organizations that serve older adults; however, nutritional benefits obtained from snack food and beverages warrant their inclusion in older adults' diet.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jada.2010.02.009

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zizza, C. A., Arsiwalla, D. D., & Ellison, K. J.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Zizza, Claire A.
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
110
Issue
5
Pages
768-772
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053611702
Cited by
50
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station (ALA013-020)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
snacking, older adults, vitamin intake, carotenoids, mineral intake, micronutrient adequacy, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, beta-carotene, magnesium, copper, potassium, selenium, B vitamins, lycopene, dietary behavior
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Energy Intake, Carotenoids, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Minerals, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Nutrition Surveys, Nutritional Requirements, Mental Recall, Vitamins, Geriatric Assessment, Nutrition Assessment, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review