Maintaining routine despite ongoing exposure to terrorism: a healthy strategy for adolescents?
Abstract
Purpose To examine the association between ongoing terrorism and Israeli adolescents' routine activities.Methods A total of 1336 junior high and high school students from Jerusalem (46.9% boys and 53.1% girls) self-reported on measures of maintaining or reducing their level of routine activities, perceived parental monitoring, posttraumatic symptoms (PTS) and functional impairment. We used linear regressions to explore possible associations between decreasing (or maintaining) level of routine activities, parental monitoring, and PTS and functional impairment.Results A majority of the adolescents reported that under the recurrent threat of terrorism they maintained their routine (i.e., 65.8% continued using public transportation). Similarly, more than half the students perceived their parents as encouraging them to maintain their routine activities. Furthermore, greater exposure to terrorism was associated with more PTS symptoms and functional impairment. Nonetheless, a reduced level of routine activities was a significant predictor for higher PTS and functional impairment, even after controlling for level of exposure to terrorism, gender and age. Similarly, perceived parental limiting of routine activities was a significant predictor for higher PTS and functional impairment, even after controlling for gender, age and the level of exposure to terrorism.Conclusions Our results support practitioners' recommendations to encourage continuity in daily routine. Disruption of routine activities may result in the development of avoidance reactions that can lead to posttraumatic stress disorder.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Disruption of daily life and routine during stressful events may lead to functional impairment and post-traumatic stress outcomes.
“the disruption of daily life and routine during stressful events may lead to functional impairment and post-traumatic stress outcomes (Pat-Horenczyk et al., 2006).”
From Media for Coping During COVID-19 Social Distancing: Stress, Anxiety, and Psychological Well-Being (2020) · cites this paper as Pat-Horenczyk et al., 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Pat-Horenczyk, R., Schiff, M., & Doppelt, O.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Schiff, Miriam
- ORCID
- Schiff, Miriam
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescent Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-205
- ISSN
- 1054-139X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054469280
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Keywords
- terrorism exposure, routine activities, adolescents, posttraumatic stress symptoms, functional disability, parental supervision, avoidance behavior, transit ridership, Israeli youth, post-traumatic stress disorder
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Israel, Parent-Child Relations, Regression Analysis, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Terrorism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review