Cited by 182Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyDigital Games and Media

Factors Correlated with Violent Video Game Use by Adolescent Boys and Girls

Olson, Cheryl K., Kutner, Lawrence A., Warner, Dorothy E., Almerigi, Jason B., Baer, Lee, Nicholi, Armand M., Beresin, Eugene V.·2007·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose To compare the video and computer game play patterns of young adolescent boys and girls, including factors correlated with playing violent games.Methods Data collected in November/December, 2004 from children in grades 7 and 8 at two demographically diverse schools in Pennsylvania and South Carolina, using a detailed written self-reported survey.Results Of 1254 participants (53% female, 47% male), only 80 reported playing no electronic games in the previous 6 months. Of 1126 children who listed frequently played game titles, almost half (48.8%) played at least one violent (mature-rated) game regularly (67.9% of boys and 29.2% of girls). One third of boys and 10.7% of girls play games nearly every day; only 1 in 20 plays often or always with a parent. Playing M-rated games is positively correlated (p < .001) with being male, frequent game play, playing with strangers over the Internet, having a game system and computer in one's bedroom, and using games to manage anger.Conclusions Most young adolescent boys and many girls routinely play M-rated games. Implications for identifying atypical and potentially harmful patterns of electronic game use are discussed, as well as the need for greater media literacy among parents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.01.001

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olson, C. K., Kutner, L. A., Warner, D. E., Almerigi, J. B., Baer, L., Nicholi, A. M., & Beresin, E. V.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Olson, Cheryl K.
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
77-83
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104660530
Cited by
182
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 10
FWCI
37.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
violent video games, adolescent gaming, gender differences, media literacy, parental involvement, anger management, computer game use, media effects on adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Pennsylvania, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, South Carolina, Violence, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Video Games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review