CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 156Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAdolescent Health and BehaviorsYouth, Drugs, and Violence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk and Protective Factors for Adolescent Substance Use in Washington State, the United States and Victoria, Australia: A Longitudinal Study

Open access
Hemphill, Sheryl A., Heerde, Jessica A., Herrenkohl, Todd I., Patton, George C., Toumbourou, John W., Catalano, Richard F.·2011·Journal of Adolescent Health
DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.017PMC PMC3032384
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose To compare the levels of risk and protective factors and the predictive influence of these factors on alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis use over a 12-month follow-up period in Washington State in the United States and in Victoria, Australia.Method The study involved a longitudinal school-based survey of students drawn as a two-stage cluster sample recruited through schools, and administered in the years 2002 and 2003 in both states. The study used statewide representative samples of students in the seventh and ninth grades (n = 3,876) in Washington State and Victoria.Results Washington State students, relative to Victorian students, had higher rates of cannabis use but lower rates of alcohol and tobacco use at time 1. Levels of risk and protective factors showed few but important differences that contribute to the explanation of differences in substance use; Washington State students, relative to Victorian students, reported higher religiosity (odds ratio, .96 vs. .79) and availability of handguns (odds ratio, 1.23 vs. 1.18), but less favorable peer, community, and parental attitudes to substance use. The associations with substance use at follow-up are generally comparable, but in many instances were weaker in Washington State.Conclusions Levels of risk and protective factors and their associations with substance use at follow-up were mostly similar in the two states. Further high-quality longitudinal studies to establish invariance in the relations between risk and protective factors and substance use in adolescence across diverse countries are warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.017

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rachal, 1982, Facts for planning no. 4: Alcohol misuse by adolescents, Alcohol Health Res World, 6, 61

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 156

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hemphill, S. A., Heerde, J. A., Herrenkohl, T. I., Patton, G. C., Toumbourou, J. W., & Catalano, R. F.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Hemphill, Sheryl A.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
312-320
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.017
PMC
PMC3032384
OpenAlex
W2006459204
Cited by
156
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA017188)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA012140)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042828)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Health and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
Keywords
adolescent substance use, risk factors, protective factors, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, cannabis use, religiosity, attitudes toward substance use, cross-national comparison, Washington State, Victoria, Australia, school-based survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Peer Group, Social Environment, Victoria, Washington, Health Behavior, Substance-Related Disorders, Harm Reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review