Cited by 33Skin Protection and AgingSmoking Behavior and CessationAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

An Intervention to Decrease Adolescent Indoor Tanning: A Multi-Method Pilot Study

Open access
Lazovich, DeAnn, Choi, Kelvin, Rolnick, Cheri, Jackson, Jody M., Forster, Jean, Southwell, Brian·2013·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

PURPOSE: Indoor tanning usually begins during adolescence, but few strategies exist to discourage adolescent use. We developed and tested a parent-teenager intervention to decrease indoor tanning use. METHODS: Through focus groups, we identified key messages to enhance parent-teenager communication about indoor tanning, and then developed a pamphlet for parents and postcards for adolescents to use in a direct mail experiment with randomly selected households. Two weeks after the mailing, we asked intervention parents (n = 87) and adolescents (n = 69) and nonintervention parents (n = 31) and adolescents (n = 28) about intervention receipt and content recall, parental concern, monitoring, parent-teenager conversations, and indoor tanning intention. RESULTS: In intervention households, 54% of mothers and 56% of girls recalled receipt and reported reading materials, but few boys and no fathers did. Among mothers, 57% in intervention households indicated concern about daughters' indoor tanning, and 25% would allow daughters to tan indoors, whereas 43% of nonintervention mothers had concerns and 46% would allow indoor tanning. Fewer girls in intervention households than in nonintervention households thought parents would allow indoor tanning (44% vs. 65%), and fewer intended to tan indoors (36% vs. 60%). Most mothers and daughters who read the intervention materials also reported discussions about indoor tanning. Moreover, the less likely girls were to think that their mothers would allow indoor tanning, the less likely it was that they intended to tan indoors, a relationship mediated by perceptions of maternal monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic qualitative and quantitative research approach yielded well-received indoor tanning prevention messages for mothers and female adolescents. Enhancing maternal monitoring has potential to decrease adolescent indoor tanning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.08.009

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fathers and sons were largely unaware of the messaging.

    “Fathers and sons were largely unaware of the messaging, however, suggesting that additional avenues are needed to engage men in awareness of the dangers of UV radiation exposure.”

    From Mechanisms and prevention of <scp>UV</scp>‐induced melanoma (2018) · cites this paper as [184]

  • Targeted messaging to parents of adolescents was effective at starting conversations between mothers and daughters about indoor tanning concerns.

    “Targeted messaging to parents of adolescents was effective at starting conversations between mothers and daughters about the concerns of indoor tanning184.”

    From Mechanisms and prevention of <scp>UV</scp>‐induced melanoma (2018) · cites this paper as [184]

  • In households receiving these messages, fewer daughters reported a desire to go indoor tanning than in non-intervention households.

    “In households receiving these messages, fewer daughters reported a desire to go indoor tanning than non-intervention households184.”

    From Mechanisms and prevention of <scp>UV</scp>‐induced melanoma (2018) · cites this paper as [184]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lazovich, D., Choi, K., Rolnick, C., Jackson, J. M., Forster, J., & Southwell, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • HealthPartners (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Lazovich, DeAnn
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
S76-S82
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072339175
Cited by
33
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R21CA118222)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
indoor tanning, maternal monitoring, parental concerns, health education materials, mothers, girls
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Mother-Child Relations, Pamphlets, Pilot Projects, Postal Service, Skin Neoplasms, Focus Groups, Sunbathing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review