Cited by 70Reproductive Health and ContraceptionAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare

The role of parents and partners in minors’ decisions to have an abortion and anticipated coping after abortion

Ralph, Lauren, Gould, Heather, Baker, Anne, Foster, Diana Greene·2014·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose Despite the prevalence of laws requiring parental involvement in minors' abortion, little is known about the effect of parental involvement on minors' abortion decision making and anticipated coping after abortion.Methods We analyzed data from medical charts and counseling needs assessment forms for 5,109 women accessing abortion services at a clinic in 2008, 9% (n = 476) of whom were minors aged 17 years and under. We examined differences in abortion characteristics, including parental and partner involvement, between minors and adults, and used multivariate logistic regression models to examine predictors of parental involvement and support, confidence in the decision, and anticipated poor coping among minors.Results Most minors reported that their mothers (64%) and partners (83%) were aware of their abortion. Younger age was associated with increased odds of maternal awareness and reduced odds of partner awareness. Compared with adults, minors were more likely to report external pressure to seek abortion (10% vs. 3%), and mothers were the most common source of pressure. Minors overall had high confidence in their decision and anticipated feeling a range of emotions post-abortion; minors who felt pressure to seek abortion were less likely to report having confidence in their decision (odds ratio = .1) and more likely to report anticipating poor coping (odds ratio = 5.6).Conclusions Most minors involve parents and partners in their decision making regarding abortion, and find support from these individuals. For a minority, experiencing pressure or lack of support reduces confidence in their decision and increases their likelihood of anticipating poor coping after an abortion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.09.021

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ralph, L., Gould, H., Baker, A., & Foster, D. G.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Ralph, Lauren
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
428-434
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993851026
Cited by
70
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
adolescent abortion, parental involvement, partner involvement, maternal awareness, decision confidence, adolescent reproductive health
MeSH terms
Abortion, Induced, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parents, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Adolescence, Sexual Partners, United States, Minors, Parental Consent, Parental Notification, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review