Cited by 120Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPoisoning and overdose treatments

Impact of Marijuana Legalization in Colorado on Adolescent Emergency and Urgent Care Visits

Open access
Wang, George Sam, Davies, Sara Deakyne, Halmo, Laurie Seidel, Sass, Amy, Mistry, Rakesh D.·2018·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose Approximately 6%-8% of U.S. adolescents are daily/past-month users of marijuana. However, survey data may not reliably reflect the impact of legalization on adolescents. The objective was to evaluate the impact of marijuana legalization on adolescent emergency department and urgent cares visits to a children's hospital in Colorado, a state that has allowed both medical and recreational marijuana. Methods Retrospective review of marijuana-related visits by International Classification of Diseases codes and urine drug screens, from 2005 through 2015, for patients ≥ 13 and < 21 years old. Results From 2005 to 2015, 4,202 marijuana-related visits were identified. Behavioral health evaluation was obtained for 2,813 (67%); a psychiatric diagnosis was made for the majority (71%) of these visits. Coingestants were common; the most common was ethanol (12%). Marijuana-related visits increased from 1.8 per 1,000 visits in 2009 to 4.9 in 2015. (p = < .0001) CONCLUSIONS: Despite national survey data suggesting no appreciable difference in adolescent marijuana use, our data demonstrate a significant increase in adolescent marijuana-associated emergency department and urgent cares visits in Colorado.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.12.010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The empirical literature suggests RCL is associated with increased cannabis-related emergency visits and other health consequences (eg, trauma-related cases).

    “In terms of health outcomes, the empirical literature suggests RCL is associated with increased cannabis-related emergency visits24,67,70,76 and other health consequences (eg, trauma-related cases 57 ).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, G. S., Davies, S. D., Halmo, L. S., Sass, A., & Mistry, R. D.
Affiliations
Children's Hospital Colorado (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, George Sam
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
239-241
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794884245
Cited by
120
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 4
FWCI
10.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
Keywords
cannabis legalization, adolescent cannabis use, emergency department visits, urgent care visits, psychiatric diagnosis, ethanol, urine drug testing, Colorado
MeSH terms
Marijuana Use, Adolescent, Adult, Ambulatory Care, Cannabis, Marijuana Abuse, Colorado, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review