CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,199Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSmoking Behavior and CessationYouth, Drugs, and Violence

Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2017: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use

Open access
Johnston, L.D, Miech, R.A., O'Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., Schulenberg, J.E., Patrick, M.E.·2018
DOI 10.3998/2027.42/148123
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

i tracked adolescent drug use.Nicotine vaping prevalence rates in 2018 were 11%, 25%, and 30%, respectively.Marijuana vaping also increased substantially in 2018 as this new way of using marijuana becomes more mainstream.In 2018 prevalence of use in the last 12 months increased 1.3, 4.2, and 3.6 percentage points in 8 th , 10 th , and 12 th grades to levels of 4.4%, 12.4%, and 13.1%, respectively.Vaping just flavoring also substantially increased in 2018 to past-year prevalence levels of 15%, 25%, and 26% in 8 th , 10 th , and 12 th grades.Adolescents associate little risk of harm with vaping.MTF asks separately about regular use of "e-cigarettes" and also regular vaping of nicotine.Levels of perceived risk for these behaviors rank near the lowest of all substances, with little change in recent years. Alcohol Use Continues Declining in Upper GradesAlcohol remains the substance most widely used by today's teenagers.Despite recent declines, by the end of high school six out of every ten students (59%) have consumed alcohol (more than just a few sips) at some time in their lives (after a significant 3 percentage point drop in 2018); and about a quarter (24%) have done so by 8 th grade.(Only the 12 th grade showed significant change in 2018.)Alcohol use began a substantial decline in the 1980s.To some degree, alcohol trends have tended to parallel the trends in illicit drug use.These include a modest increase in binge drinking (defined as having five or more drinks in a row at least once in the past two weeks) in the early to mid-1990s, though it was a proportionally smaller increase than was seen for cigarettes and most of the illicit drugs.Fortunately, binge drinking rates leveled off in the early 2000s, just about when the illicit drug rates began to turn around, and in 2002, a drop in drinking and drunkenness resumed in all grades.Gradual declines in thirty-day prevalence continued in the upper grades into 2018, which marked the lowest levels for alcohol use and drunkenness ever recorded by the survey in the three grades combined.However, the decline in the annual prevalence of alcohol use has halted in the two lower grades.Only in 12 th grade is decline continuing, likely as the result of a cohort effect.This development may herald the end of the long-term decline in adolescent alcohol use.Still, prior to this year lifetime prevalence and annual prevalence for the three grades combined both declined by roughly 40-45% from the peak levels of use reached in the mid-1990s; 30-day prevalence was down by about one-half since then; and daily prevalence by three-fourths.These are dramatic declines for such a culturally ingrained behavior and good news to many parents.3 Prevalence refers to the proportion or percentage of the sample reporting use of the given substance on one or more occasions in a given time interval-e.g., lifetime, past 12 months, or past 30 days.For most drugs, the prevalence of daily use refers to reported use on 20 or more occasions in the past 30 days, except for cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, for which actual daily use is measured, and for binge drinking, defined as having 5+ drinks on at least one occasion in the prior two weeks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3998/2027.42/148123

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Johnston, L. D., Miech, R. A., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Schulenberg, J. E., & Patrick, M. E.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
ORCID
Publisher
Monitoring the Future
Published
2018
DOI
10.3998/2027.42/148123
OpenAlex
W2754382760
Cited by
1,199
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 203 · 2019: 247 · 2018: 155 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Michigan
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (001411, DA001411, R01DA001411)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
Keywords
adolescent drug use, adolescent alcohol use, binge drinking, cannabis use, nicotine vaping, electronic cigarettes, illicit drug use, substance use trends, drunkenness, tobacco use, Monitoring the Future, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review