Cited by 17Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealthcare Systems and TechnologyAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

Correlation of Warm Handoffs Versus Electronic Referrals and Engagement With Mental Health Services Co-located in a Pediatric Primary Care Clinic

Open access
Anand, Paridhi, Desai, Ninad·2023·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Objective To analyze the correlation of referral mechanism-warm handoff or electronic referral and attendance at behavioral health appointments in an outpatient pediatric primary care setting.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in an inner-city pediatric primary care clinic from January 2019 to December 2019. Adolescent patients who screened positive for depression or anxiety were referred to a Licensed Master Social Worker (LMSW) either via a warm handoff (WH group, n = 148) or an electronic referral (EF group, n = 180). The EF group was contacted by the LMSW via telephone to schedule an appointment. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation of type of referral, age, gender, race/ethnicity, primary language, and time between referral and first contact with attendance at three appointments.Results The WH group was more likely to engage with mental health services compared to the EF group (odds ratio = 3.301, 95% confidence interval = 1.850-5.902, p = .002) while age, gender, race/ethnicity, and primary language had no correlation. Within the EF group, those who were contacted by the LMSW within 3 days (1-3 days group) were more likely to attend appointments (odds ratio = 2.680, 95% confidence interval = 0.414-8.219, p = .040). There was no difference in attendance in the WH group and the 1-3 days group (p = .913) DISCUSSION: A warm handoff between primary care providers and behavioral health clinicians is significantly correlated with engagement with behavioral health services for adolescents who screen positive for depression or anxiety. Contact with the family within 3 days of referral is significantly correlated with engagement compared to a longer duration between referral and family contact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.02.032

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Warm handoffs help reduce fragmentation, clarify roles, and prevent caregivers from being left to coordinate alone.

    “Warm handoffs, direct, relational transitions where responsibility is transferred with the caregiver rather than to them, help reduce fragmentation, clarify roles, and prevent caregivers from being left to coordinate alone [33,34,35,36].”

    From Home care comparison (2026) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) describes warm handoffs as direct communication between providers in a transition that might otherwise disrupt care. The Discussion (page unavailable) says they may transfer trust from the primary care provider to the receiving clinician and reports an association with therapy attendance. Neither section establishes that warm handoffs clarify roles or prevent caregivers from having to coordinate care alone. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Richardson LP, Ludman E, McCauley E, et al. Collaborative care for adolescents with depression in primary care. JAMA 2014;312:809.
  2. Asarnow JR, Rozenman M, Wiblin J, Zeltzer L. Integrated medical- behavioral care compared with usual primary care for child and adoles- cent behavioral health. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:929e37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anand, P., & Desai, N.
Affiliations
  • New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (US)
  • Kings County Hospital Center (US)
Corresponding author
Anand, Paridhi
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
325-330
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4365813242
Cited by
17
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
warm handoff, electronic referral, mental health service engagement, behavioral health referral, pediatric primary care, adolescent depression, adolescent anxiety, appointment attendance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Humans, Mental Health Services, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Patient Handoff

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review