Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How much water is used for irrigation? A new approach exploiting coarse resolution satellite soil moisture products

Open access
Brocca, Luca, Tarpanelli, Angelica, Filippucci, Paolo, Dorigo, Wouter, Zaussinger, Felix, Gruber, Alexander, Fernández-Prieto, Diego·2018·International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Abstract

Abstract Knowledge of irrigation is essential for ensuring food and water security, and to cope with the scarcity of water resources, which is expected to exacerbate under the pressure of climate change and population increase. Even though irrigation is likely the most important direct human intervention in the hydrological cycle, we have only partial knowledge on the areas of our planet in which irrigation takes place, and almost no information on the amount of water that is applied for irrigation. In this study, we developed a new approach exploiting satellite soil moisture observations for quantifying the amount of water applied for irrigation. Through the inversion of the soil water balance equation, and by using satellite soil moisture products as input, the amount of water entering into the soil, and hence irrigation, is determined. Through synthetic experiments, we first assessed the impact of soil moisture measurement uncertainty and temporal resolution, also as a function of climate, on the accuracy of the method. Second, we applied the proposed approach to currently available coarse resolution satellite soil moisture products retrieved from the Soil Moisture Active and Passive mission (SMAP), the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission, the Advanced SCATterometer (ASCAT), and the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR-2). Nine pilot sites in Europe, USA, Australia and Africa were used as case study to test the method in a real-world application. The synthetic experiment showed that the method is able to quantify irrigation, with satisfactory performance from satellite data with retrieval errors lower than ∼0.04 m³/m³ and revisit times shorter than 3 days. In the case studies based on real satellite data, qualitative assessments (due to missing in situ irrigation observations) showed that over regions in which satellite soil moisture products perform well, and which are characterized by prolonged periods without rainfall, the method shows good results in quantifying irrigation. However, at sites in which rainfall is sustained throughout the year, the proposed method fails in obtaining reliable performances. Similarly, low performances are obtained in areas where satellite products uncertainties are too large, or their spatial resolution is too coarse with respect to the size of the irrigated fields.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jag.2018.08.023

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Metadata

Authors
Brocca, L., Tarpanelli, A., Filippucci, P., Dorigo, W., Zaussinger, F., Gruber, A., & Fernández-Prieto, D.
Venue
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
73
Pages
752-766
ISSN
  • 0303-2434 (ISSN-L)
  • 1569-8432
OpenAlex
W2890649118
Cited by
264
References
46
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How much water is used for irrigation? A new approach exploiting coarse resolution satellite soil moisture products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jag.2018.08.023
The paper
Brocca, L., Tarpanelli, A., Filippucci, P., Dorigo, W., Zaussinger, F., Gruber, A., & Fernández-Prieto, D. (2018). How much water is used for irrigation? A new approach exploiting coarse resolution satellite soil moisture products. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2018.08.023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.