Cited by 21Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsCOVID-19 and Mental HealthEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Ethical and logistical considerations of caring for older adults on inpatient psychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Fahed, Mario, Barron, Gregory C., Steffens, David C.·2020·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought challenges to delivery of care for older adults on inpatient psychiatry. We describe two cases: patient A, a 62-year-old woman who initially refused screening for potential COVID-19, bringing up questions about threshold for capacity when public health is at risk and questions about whether screening for infection should be different in older adults. The other case, patient B, is that of an 83-year-old man who was on the unit when patient A tested positive, and brought up concerns for risk of dissemination in the context of wandering, spitting behaviors, and inability to adhere to room isolation or masking measures. We review measures taken to decrease risk of transmission and improve screening for infection in older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.04.027

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fahed, M., Barron, G. C., & Steffens, D. C.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Fahed, Mario
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
829-834
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021808580
Cited by
21
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, older adults, psychiatric inpatient care, psychiatric hospitalization, infection screening, transmission prevention, informed consent, decision-making capacity, wandering behavior, isolation measures, masking, ethical considerations
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Patient Care, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review