Cited by 39Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsEosinophilic Esophagitis

Anaphylaxis to hidden pea protein: A Canadian pediatric case series

Lavine, Elana, Ben-Shoshan, Moshe·2019·The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.02.010

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lavine, E., & Ben-Shoshan, M.
Affiliations
Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
Lavine, Elana
Venue
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
2070-2071
ISSN
2213-2198 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2915248719
Cited by
39
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
anaphylaxis, pea protein, hidden allergens, food allergy, plant-based foods, high-protein diet, pediatric food allergy, health foods
MeSH terms
Pea Proteins, Adolescent, Anaphylaxis, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Food Hypersensitivity, Humans, Infant, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review