Cited by 89Drug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchContact Dermatitis and Allergies

Identifying low-risk beta-lactam allergy patients in a UK tertiary centre.

Open access
Siew, Leonard Quok Chean, Li, Philip Hei, Watts, Timothy J., Thomas, Iason, Ue, Kok Loong, Caballero, M. Rosario, Rutkowski, Krzysztof, Till, Stephen J. +2 more·2019·The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice

Abstract

Background There are marked geographical as well as temporal differences in patient sensitization profiles to β-lactams (BL).Objective To determine the utility of skin test reagents and identify a cohort of patients where skin testing can be safely omitted in a cohort of patients referred to a UK tertiary referral center.Methods A retrospective study of the clinical characteristics of 1092 patients referred for BL allergy testing was analyzed using multivariate regression analysis. The effectiveness of skin test reagents was also evaluated.Results Multivariate logistic regression identified that a history of anaphylaxis (odds ratio [OR] 10.98, P = .001) and the patients' recall of the index drug (apart from ampicillin and meropenem, OR 3.51-12.43, P < .05) were independent predictors of type I BL allergic status and a time of less than 1 year elapsed since index reaction significantly increasing the odds of a patient with a history of anaphylaxis, having a type I BL allergy (OR 38.66, P = .003). An absence of anaphylactic severity, unknown name of the index drug and a reaction occurring more than 1 year before testing, has a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.4%, which was similar to the NPV of skin testing of 98.9% for type I BL allergy. The NPV of skin testing with benzylpenicillin + amoxicillin ± index BL was similar with (98.9%) or without (98.1%) the use of benzylpenicillin polylysine and minor determinant for type I BL allergy.Conclusion We identified a "low risk" cohort of patients where the history is of similar reliability to skin testing in predicting nonallergic status for BL allergy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.03.015

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siew, L. Q. C., Li, P. H., Watts, T. J., Thomas, I., Ue, K. L., Caballero, M. R., Rutkowski, K., Till, S. J., Pillai, P., & Haque, R.
Affiliations
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
  • Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Siew, Leonard Quok Chean
Venue
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
2173-2181.e1
ISSN
2213-2198 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2924323439
Cited by
89
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • King's College London
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Department of Health, Australian Government
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  • Department of Health and Social Care
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Keywords
beta-lactam allergy, drug hypersensitivity, skin testing, anaphylaxis, low-risk patients, negative predictive value, amoxicillin, ampicillin, meropenem, allergy testing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amoxicillin, Anaphylaxis, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Drug Hypersensitivity, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Intradermal Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Penicillin G, Penicillins, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Skin Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Risk Assessment, beta-Lactams, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review