Cited by 120Advancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies

Effect of particle size and purity on the low temperature electrochemical performance of LiFePO4/C cathode material

Zhao, Nannan, Li, Yongsheng, Zhao, Xinxin, Zhi, Xiaoke, Liang, Guangchuan·2016·Journal of Alloys and Compounds

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.070

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, N., Li, Y., Zhao, X., Zhi, X., & Liang, G.
Affiliations
Hebei University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Liang, Guangchuan
Venue
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
683
Pages
123-132
ISSN
0925-8388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2341527185
Cited by
120
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Alloys and Compounds (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hebei province science and technology program (14214902D)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Keywords
LiFePO4/C cathode, low-temperature performance, particle size, purity, impurities, lithium diffusion coefficient, lattice distortion, capacity retention, lithium-ion batteries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review