The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent advances in 3D g-C3N4 composite photocatalysts for photocatalytic water splitting, degradation of pollutants and CO2 reduction
Abstract
Abstract Recently, g-C 3 N 4 has exhibited excellent catalytic performances in photocatalytic water splitting for H 2 and O 2 generation, degradation of pollutants and CO 2 reduction. However, the bulk g-C 3 N 4 demonstrates some disadvantages such as low specific surface area, high defect density, fast recombination possibility of photogenerated electron-hole pairs, and non-recyclable characteristics, leading to low photocatalytic performance and efficiency. The three-dimensional (3D) network-like g-C 3 N 4 composite materials constructed by nanotechnology can effectively improve the adsorption capacity, light response, structure stability and recyclability of photocatalysts, which results in a significant increase in the photocatalytic performance and utilization. It is a novel way to achieve high-efficient separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs and improve photocatalytic activity. In this review, the recent research progresses especially the synthesis strategy of 3D g-C 3 N 4 composite photocatalysts and their applications for photocatalytic water splitting, degradation of organic pollutants and CO 2 reduction are firstly and systematically introduced and discussed. The review and prospect of 3D g-C 3 N 4 composite materials can provide some new ideas and directions for the research and development of 3D g-C 3 N 4 composite photocatalysts with high activity, strong adsorption, facile recyclability, and no secondary pollution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ong, W.-J., Tan, L.-L., Ng, Y. H., Yong, S.-T., & Chai, S.-P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075 · Cited by 7,147
Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway
Liu, J., Liu, Y., Liu, N., Han, Y., Zhang, X., Huang, H., Lifshitz, Y., Lee, S.-T., Zhong, J., & Kang, Z. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa3145 · Cited by 4,468
New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces
Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21234j · Cited by 3,160
Tong, Z., Yang, D., Shi, J., Nan, Y., Sun, Y., & Jiang, Z. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5b09503 · Cited by 431
Hu, J., Chen, D., Li, N., Xu, Q., Li, H., He, J., & Lu, J. (2018) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.04.080 · Cited by 113
Cited by
Li, X., Wang, W., Dong, F., Zhang, Z., Han, L., Luo, X., Huang, J., Feng, Z., Chen, Z., Jia, G., et al. (2021) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c05354 · Cited by 357
Self-citationThe nonmetal modulation of composition and morphology of g-C3N4-based photocatalysts
He, F., Wang, Z., Li, Y., Peng, S., & Liu, B. (2020) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118828 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, X., Xiong, J., Gao, X., Huang, J., Feng, Z., Chen, Z., & Zhu, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Alloys and Compounds
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 802
- Pages
- 196-209
- ISSN
- 0925-8388 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2952223397
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances in 3D g-C3N4 composite photocatalysts for photocatalytic water splitting, degradation of pollutants and CO2 reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.185
- The paper
- Li, X., Xiong, J., Gao, X., Huang, J., Feng, Z., Chen, Z., & Zhu, Y. (2019). Recent advances in 3D g-C3N4 composite photocatalysts for photocatalytic water splitting, degradation of pollutants and CO2 reduction. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.185
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.