Unobtrusive assessment of activity patterns associated with mild cognitive impairment
Open accessAbstract
Background: Timely detection of early cognitive impairment is difficult. Measures taken in the clinic reflect a single snapshot of performance that might be confounded by the increased variability typical in aging and disease. We evaluated the use of continuous, long‐term, and unobtrusive in‐home monitoring to assess neurologic function in healthy and cognitively impaired elders. Methods: Fourteen older adults 65 years and older living independently in the community were monitored in their homes by using an unobtrusive sensor system. Measures of walking speed and amount of activity in the home were obtained. Wavelet analysis was used to examine variance in activity at multiple time scales. Results: More than 108,000 person‐hours of continuous activity data were collected during periods as long as 418 days (mean, 315 ± 82 days). The coefficient of variation in the median walking speed was twice as high in the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) group (0.147 ± 0.074) as compared with the healthy group (0.079 ± 0.027; t 11 = 2.266, P < .03). Furthermore, the 24‐hour wavelet variance was greater in the MCI group (MCI, 4.07 ± 0.14; healthy elderly, 3.79 ± 0.23; F = 7.58, P ≤ .008), indicating that the day‐to‐day pattern of activity of subjects in the MCI group was more variable than that of the cognitively healthy controls. Conclusions: The results not only demonstrate the feasibility of these methods but also suggest clear potential advantages to this new methodology. This approach might provide an improved means of detecting the earliest transition to MCI compared with conventional episodic testing in a clinic environment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sensor system developed by Hayes et al. was completely unobtrusive.
“The sensor system was completely unobtrusive.”
From A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation (2012) · cites this paper as [122]
The results of Hayes et al.'s study showed that daily activity patterns of individuals with cognitive impairments tend to be more variable than those of healthy controls.
“The results of the study showed that daily activity patterns of individuals with cognitive impairments tend to be more variable than healthy controls.”
From A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation (2012) · cites this paper as [122]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 187
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [33]Wilson R Parkinsonianlike signs and risk of incident Alzheimer disease in older persons Archives of Neurology 2003 60 539 544 12707067
- Authors
- Hayes, T. L., Abendroth, F., Adami, A., Pavel, M., Zitzelberger, T. A., & Kaye, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Department of Computer Science Universidade de Caxias do Sul Caxias do Sul RS Brazil
- Department of Biomedical Engineering Oregon Health & Science University Portland OR USA
- Corresponding author
- Hayes, Tamara L.
- ORCID
- Kaye, Jeffrey A.
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 395-405
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- PMC
- PMC2664300
- OpenAlex
- W2139609044
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (P30 AG08017)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- mild cognitive impairment, non-intrusive monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Mental Status Schedule, Motor Activity, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Residence Characteristics, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review