Cited by 1Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTreatment of Major Depression

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

P3‐303: Antidepressant drug use and cognitive deficits in older men: addressing confounding by indication using different methods

Han, Ling·2009·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have found associations between antidepressant drug use and cognitive impairments in older persons. The objective of this study was to examine whether this association may result from confounding by indication using different analytic approaches. 544 community-dwelling men aged 65 years or older with hypertension had cognitive performance measured with the Hopkins Verbal Recall (HVR) at a Veterans Administration primary care clinic. Antidepressant and other psychotropic medication use during a one-year period were ascertained using medical records. Potential confounding by indication, defined by a diagnosis of depressive or related psychiatric disorders from medical records and depression severity at baseline interview, was examined using conventional multiple linear regression (MLR), a two-stage regression (TSR), and a structural equation model (SEM), respectively. Before adjusting for indications, a one unit increase in cumulative antidepressant exposure was associated with 1.00 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.06 to 1.94, p 0.05). The apparent association between antidepressant exposure and cognitive deficit in older persons without adjusting for depressive-related psychiatric disorders may be seriously biased. Among the three methods explored, SEM offers the most powerful bias reduction and conceptually appealing empirical framework to test confounding by indication hypothesis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.07.041

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Han, L.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Han, Ling
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07
Volume
5
Issue
4S_Part_17
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2065460413
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
cognitive impairment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review