Cited by 96Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

The ADAS-Cog revisited: Novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog to improve efficiency in MCI and early AD trials

Open access
Raghavan, Nandini, Samtani, Mahesh N., Farnum, Michael, Yang, Eric, Novak, Gerald, Grundman, Michael, Narayan, Vaibhav, DiBernardo, Allitia +1 more·2013·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) has been used widely as a cognitive end point in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) clinical trials. Efforts to treat AD pathology at earlier stages have also used ADAS-Cog, but failure in these trials can be difficult to interpret because the scale has well-known ceiling effects that limit its use in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early AD. A wealth of data exists in ADAS-Cog from both historical trials and contemporary longitudinal natural history studies that can provide insights about parts of the scale that may be better suited for MCI and early AD trials. METHODS: Using Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study data, we identified the most informative cognitive measures from the ADAS-Cog and other available scales. We used cross-sectional analyses to characterize trajectories of ADAS-Cog and its individual subscales, as well as other cognitive, functional, or global measures across disease stages. Informative measures were identified based on standardized mean of 2-year change from baseline and were combined into novel composite endpoints. We assessed performance of the novel endpoints based on sample size requirements for a 2-year clinical trial. A bootstrap validation procedure was also undertaken to assess the reproducibility of the standardized mean changes of the selected measures and the corresponding composites. RESULTS: All proposed novel endpoints have improved standardized mean changes and thus improved statistical power compared with the ADAS-Cog 11. Further improvements were achieved by using cognitive-functional composites. Combining the novel composites with an enrichment strategy based on cerebral spinal fluid beta-amyloid (Aβ(1-42)) in a 2-year trial yielded gains in power of 20% to 40% over ADAS-Cog 11, regardless of the novel measure considered. CONCLUSION: An empirical, data-driven approach with existing instruments was used to derive novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog 11 with improved performance characteristics for MCI and early AD clinical trials. Together with patient enrichment based on Aβ(1-42) pathology, these modified endpoints may allow more efficient clinical trials in these populations and can be assessed without modifying current test administration procedures in ongoing trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.2187

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raghavan, N., Samtani, M. N., Farnum, M., Yang, E., Novak, G., Grundman, M., Narayan, V., DiBernardo, A., & Initiative, A. D. N.
Affiliations
  • Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson Raritan NJ
  • Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson Springhouse PA
  • Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson Titusville NJ
  • Global R&D Partners San Diego CA
  • Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (US)
Corresponding author
Raghavan, Nandini
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-05
Volume
9
Issue
1S
Pages
S21-31
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2008405909
Cited by
96
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (U01 AG024904)
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  • Dana Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
ADAS-Cog, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Early Diagnosis, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review