Cited by 256Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Susceptibility of the conventional criteria for mild cognitive impairment to false‐positive diagnostic errors

Open access
Edmonds, Emily C., Delano‐Wood, Lisa, Clark, Lindsay R., Jak, Amy J., Nation, Daniel A., McDonald, Carrie R., Libon, David J., Au, Rhoda +4 more·2015·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Background: We assessed whether mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subtypes could be empirically derived within the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) MCI cohort and examined associated biomarkers and clinical outcomes. Methods: Cluster analysis was performed on neuropsychological data from 825 MCI ADNI participants. Results: Four subtypes emerged: (1) dysnomic (n = 153), (2) dysexecutive (n = 102), (3) amnestic (n = 288), and (4) cluster‐derived normal (n = 282) who performed within normal limits on cognitive testing. The cluster‐derived normal group had significantly fewer APOE ε4 carriers and fewer who progressed to dementia compared with the other subtypes; they also evidenced cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer's disease biomarker profiles that did not differ from the normative reference group. Conclusions: Identification of empirically derived MCI subtypes demonstrates heterogeneity in MCI cognitive profiles that is not captured by conventional criteria. The large cluster‐derived normal group suggests that conventional diagnostic criteria are susceptible to false‐positive errors, with the result that prior MCI studies may be diluting important biomarker relationships.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.03.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 256

Authors
Edmonds, E. C., Delano‐Wood, L., Clark, L. R., Jak, A. J., Nation, D. A., McDonald, C. R., Libon, D. J., Au, R., Galasko, D., Salmon, D. P., Bondi, M. W., & Initiative, A. D. N.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (US)
Corresponding author
Bondi, Mark W.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-22
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
415-424
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2019047027
Cited by
256
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
FWCI
9.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association (NIRG‐13‐281806)
  • Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
  • National Institutes of Health (U01 AG024904)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH‐12‐2‐0012)
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, MCI subtypes
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diagnostic Errors, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Peptide Fragments, Biomarkers, Cluster Analysis, Databases, Factual, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Disease Progression, Apolipoprotein E4, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review