Earliest accumulation of β-amyloid occurs within the default-mode network and concurrently affects brain connectivity
Open accessAbstract
It is not known exactly where amyloid-β (Aβ) fibrils begin to accumulate in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Recently, we showed that abnormal levels of Aβ42 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can be detected before abnormal amyloid can be detected using PET in individuals with preclinical AD. Using these approaches, here we identify the earliest preclinical AD stage in subjects from the ADNI and BioFINDER cohorts. We show that Aβ accumulation preferentially starts in the precuneus, medial orbitofrontal, and posterior cingulate cortices, i.e., several of the core regions of the default mode network (DMN). This early pattern of Aβ accumulation is already evident in individuals with normal Aβ42 in the CSF and normal amyloid PET who subsequently convert to having abnormal CSF Aβ42. The earliest Aβ accumulation is further associated with hypoconnectivity within the DMN and between the DMN and the frontoparietal network, but not with brain atrophy or glucose hypometabolism. Our results suggest that Aβ fibrils start to accumulate predominantly within certain parts of the DMN in preclinical AD and already then affect brain connectivity.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In non-demented ADNI and BioFINDER participants, the earliest fibrillar Aβ accumulation preferentially begins in the precuneus, posterior cingulate, and medial orbitofrontal cortex, overlapping default-mode network regions, before atrophy or glucose hypometabolism. This early stage is already associated with hypoconnectivity within the DMN and between the DMN and frontoparietal network.
Key findings
- In ADNI (473 non-demented), early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−, n = 59) versus non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−, n = 218) showed increased Aβ PET accumulation in 15 of 68 cortical ROIs, mainly posterior cingulate, precuneus, and medial orbitofrontal cortex; rates were ~4–5 times higher, e.g. right posterior cingulate 2.7%/year vs 0.9%/year.
- Among 112 CSF−/PET− subjects with longitudinal CSF, 11 converted to CSF+/PET−; converters had increased rates in left posterior cingulate and right medial orbitofrontal cortex (+2.3–2.5%/year vs +0.3%), p = 0.02–0.03, but this did not survive multiple-comparison correction.
- Early Aβ accumulation overlapped most with the DMN (Jaccard coefficient 0.14) and frontoparietal network (0.07), least with sensorimotor and visual networks (0.01 each); BioFINDER (n = 406) replicated the orbitofrontal/posterior cingulate/precuneus pattern cross-sectionally.
- In BioFINDER resting-state fMRI (n = 103 PET-negative), lower CSF Aβ42 in CSF+/PET− was associated with reduced connectivity in intra-DMN and DMN–frontoparietal links (r = 0.91, p < 0.001); in CSF-low/PET−, lower Aβ42 was instead associated with increased connectivity (r = −0.85, p < 0.001). No early atrophy or FDG differences were seen; late CSF+/PET+ showed temporoparietal atrophy and temporal hypometabolism.
Methods
- ADNI: non-demented CN/MCI participants with baseline CSF Aβ42 and longitudinal florbetapir PET; groups were CSF−/PET− (n = 218), CSF+/PET− (n = 59), and CSF+/PET+ (n = 191), with cut-offs of CSF Aβ42 <192 ng/L and PET SUVR >0.872. Analyses used 68 Freesurfer ROIs and voxelwise statistics, adjusted for age, sex, and scan interval, with FDR correction; MRI VBM and FDG PET were also compared longitudinally.
- BioFINDER validation: 406 non-demented participants with cross-sectional 18F-flutemetamol PET and CSF (INNOTEST; cut-offs <517 ng/L and >0.759 SUVR); resting-state fMRI in PET-negative subjects (n = 103) correlated whole-brain connectivity with CSF Aβ42 using an NBS-like component analysis.
- CSF converters: 112 CSF−/PET− subjects with 2-year CSF follow-up; 11 converted to CSF+/PET−, analyzed primarily with non-parametric tests.
Limitations
- Stated: PET ligands mainly bind dense-core Aβ aggregates and not diffuse plaques, so the exact Aβ forms in early regions and possible PET-undetected aggregates elsewhere cannot be determined; future ligands may reveal a different early pattern.
- Stated: CSF+/PET− subjects are not all necessarily early Aβ accumulators, since this state can also result from CSF analytical factors, failed PET scans, or non-AD medical conditions; early regions are group-level and do not exclude other starting regions in some individuals.
- Stated/evident: the CSF converter analysis had limited power (n = 11) and did not survive multiple-comparison correction; BioFINDER replication used cross-sectional data only; connectivity findings are correlational, so direction and causality are not established.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 63 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
For CSF converters, SUVR increased significantly with mean rates of +2.3-2.5% per year in the left posterior cingulate cortex and right medial orbitofrontal cortex.
“For the CSF converters, the SUVR increased significantly with mean rates of +2.3–2.5% per year in the left posterior cingulate cortex and the right medial orbitofrontal cortex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The regional distribution of early accumulation of cortical Aβ fibrils resembled the brain regions involved in the DMN.
“The regional distribution of the early accumulation of cortical Aβ fibrils (Fig. 1a, b) resembled the brain regions involved in the DMN.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The significant differences were mainly seen in the orbitofrontal cortex, precuneus, insula, and posterior/isthmus cingulate cortex.
“The significant differences were in agreement with the voxelwise analyses and were mainly seen in the orbitofrontal cortex, precuneus, insula, and the posterior/isthmus cingulate cortex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Early stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) had similar CSF tau levels as non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−).
“Early stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) had significantly higher prevalence of the APOE ε4 genotype and a slightly higher neocortical florbetapir standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR), but similar baseline cognition, hippocampal volume, and CSF tau levels as non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The group comparisons between CSF converters and non-converters were still significant after adjustment for age, gender, and time between PET scans.
“The group comparisons were still significant after adjustment of age, gender, and time between PET scans, but probably because of the limited statistical power (n = 11) there were no significant differences after multiple comparison correction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Non-demented late stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) had worse cognition at baseline.
“By contrast, the non-demented late stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) showed, at baseline, signs of neurodegeneration with hippocampal atrophy, higher CSF tau levels and worse cognition, and had per definition significantly increased florbetapir SUVRs (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Early stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) had similar hippocampal volume as non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−).
“Early stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) had significantly higher prevalence of the APOE ε4 genotype and a slightly higher neocortical florbetapir standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR), but similar baseline cognition, hippocampal volume, and CSF tau levels as non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Early stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) had similar baseline cognition as non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−).
“Early stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) had significantly higher prevalence of the APOE ε4 genotype and a slightly higher neocortical florbetapir standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR), but similar baseline cognition, hippocampal volume, and CSF tau levels as non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The distinct pattern of early Aβ accumulation can be contrasted to the more global Aβ accumulation pattern seen in late, but still non-demented, Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) compared with non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−).
“The distinct pattern of early Aβ accumulation (Fig. 1a, b, Table 2) can be contrasted to the more global Aβ accumulation pattern seen in late, but still non-demented, Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) compared with non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) (Fig. 1c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Early stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) had significantly higher prevalence of the APOE ε4 genotype than non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−).
“Early stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) had significantly higher prevalence of the APOE ε4 genotype and a slightly higher neocortical florbetapir standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR), but similar baseline cognition, hippocampal volume, and CSF tau levels as non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Early stage Aβ accumulation is associated with hypoconnectivity within the DMN and between the DMN and the frontoparietal network in individuals with normal Aβ PET.
“The relationship between early stage Aβ accumulation and whole-brain functional connectivity was examined in detail and revealed that hypoconnectivity, especially within the DMN and between DMN and the frontoparietal network, was associated with low CSF Aβ42 levels in individuals that still had normal Aβ PET scans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Significant differences in Aβ accumulation rate between CSF converters and non-converters were seen in the left posterior cingulate and right medial orbitofrontal cortex (p = 0.02-0.03).
“Significant differences in Aβ accumulation rate (Aβ PET SUVR/year) between the two groups were seen in the left posterior cingulate and right medial orbitofrontal cortex (p = 0.02–0.03).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The early pattern of Aβ accumulation is already evident in individuals with normal Aβ42 in the CSF and normal amyloid PET who subsequently convert to having abnormal CSF Aβ42.
“This early pattern of Aβ accumulation is already evident in individuals with normal Aβ42 in the CSF and normal amyloid PET who subsequently convert to having abnormal CSF Aβ42.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Aβ accumulation preferentially starts in the precuneus, medial orbitofrontal, and posterior cingulate cortices, which are core regions of the default mode network.
“We show that Aβ accumulation preferentially starts in the precuneus, medial orbitofrontal, and posterior cingulate cortices, i.e., several of the core regions of the default mode network (DMN).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The 15 early Aβ regions were also significant when adjusting for diagnosis (MCI or healthy control).
“The 15 early Aβ regions were also significant when adjusting for diagnosis (MCI or healthy control).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Using different cohorts and methods, the study identified a specific set of early Aβ-accumulating regions that largely corresponded to the default mode network.
“Consistently, using different cohorts and methods, we identified a specific set of early Aβ-accumulating regions, which largely corresponded to a functional brain network, the default mode network (DMN).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ADNI, 11 of 112 CSF−/PET− subjects with longitudinal CSF data converted to abnormal CSF Aβ42 (CSF+/PET−) at follow-up while 101 remained stable.
“At follow-up investigation, 11 of these 112 subjects had converted to abnormal CSF Aβ42 levels (CSF+/PET−) while 101 subjects remained stable with normal CSF Aβ42 levels (CSF−/PET−).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Early stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) had a slightly higher neocortical florbetapir SUVR than non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−).
“Early stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) had significantly higher prevalence of the APOE ε4 genotype and a slightly higher neocortical florbetapir standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR), but similar baseline cognition, hippocampal volume, and CSF tau levels as non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Longitudinal voxelwise comparisons showed significant increases in Aβ PET signal over time in CSF+/PET− cases in the medial orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, posterior and isthmus cingulate cortex, precuneus, and to a lesser extent temporal regions.
“The brain regions showing significant increases in Aβ PET signal over time in CSF+/PET− cases included the medial orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, posterior, and isthmus cingulate cortex, precuneus and to a lesser extent temporal regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ROI-based comparisons, 15 of 68 cortical regions had an increased Aβ accumulation rate in CSF+/PET− subjects compared to CSF−/PET− subjects.
“In the region of interest (ROI)-based comparisons, 15 of 68 cortical regions had an increased rate in the CSF+/PET− subjects compared to the CSF−/PET− subjects (Table 2 and Supplementary Movie 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The networks least involved in early Aβ accumulation were the sensorimotor (JC 0.01) and visual networks (JC 0.01).
“The networks that were the least involved in early Aβ accumulation were the sensorimotor (JC 0.01) and visual networks (JC 0.01).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Yeo, B. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Non-demented late stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) showed at baseline signs of neurodegeneration with hippocampal atrophy.
“By contrast, the non-demented late stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) showed, at baseline, signs of neurodegeneration with hippocampal atrophy, higher CSF tau levels and worse cognition, and had per definition significantly increased florbetapir SUVRs (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Similar significant regions were identified by correlating CSF Aβ42 levels with accumulation rates in PET− subjects.
“Similar significant regions were identified by correlating CSF Aβ42 levels with the accumulation rates in PET− subjects to remove potential biases from the Aβ42 cut-off (Fig. 1b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Non-demented late stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) had higher CSF tau levels at baseline.
“By contrast, the non-demented late stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) showed, at baseline, signs of neurodegeneration with hippocampal atrophy, higher CSF tau levels and worse cognition, and had per definition significantly increased florbetapir SUVRs (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The proxy group for late Aβ accumulation (CSF+/PET+) had a higher accumulation rate of Aβ PET signal over time compared with early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) around the sensorimotor cortex and occipital lobe.
“This means that our proxy group for late Aβ accumulation (CSF+/PET+) had a higher accumulation rate of the Aβ PET signal over time compared with early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) around the sensorimotor cortex and occipital lobe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On average, the yearly Aβ accumulation rate of the CSF+/PET− group was ~4-5 times that of the CSF−/PET− group in the significant brain regions.
“On average the yearly Aβ accumulation rate of the CSF+/PET− group was ~4–5 times that of the CSF−/PET− group in the significant brain regions (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ROI-based comparisons between early and late Aβ accumulators, the largest differences were seen in the precentral, postcentral, paracentral, pericalcarine, and lingual regions.
“The largest differences were seen in the precentral, postcentral, paracentral, pericalcarine, and lingual regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
After adjustment for annual change in cortical thickness, all 15 regions still differed significantly between the two groups.
“After this adjustment, all 15 regions still differed significantly between the two groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The early Aβ regions were replicated in an independent cohort (n = 406).
“These regions were replicated in an independent cohort (n = 406).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ADNI, among subjects with even earlier signs of Aβ accumulation (CSF−/PET− subjects who converted to CSF+/PET− within 2 years), significantly increased Aβ fibril accumulation rate was seen in the medial orbitofrontal and posterior cingulate cortex compared with stable CSF−/PET− subjects.
“When examining subjects with even earlier signs of Aβ accumulation (CSF−/PET− subjects who converted to CSF+/PET− within 2 years), significantly increased Aβ fibril accumulation rate was again seen in the medial orbitofrontal and posterior cingulate cortex, compared with stable CSF−/PET− subjects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The significant late Aβ regions did not overlap with the early Aβ regions.
“Note that these significant, late Aβ regions did not overlap with the early Aβ regions (compare Tables 2 and 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were no differences in FDG uptake over time between non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) and early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−).
“There were no differences in FDG uptake over time between non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) and early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) (Fig. 4c), while a cortical metabolic reduction in the temporal lobe was seen in late Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) compared with non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) (Fig. 4d) and early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) (Supplementary Fig. 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: FDG PET uptake reflects glucose metabolism/energy metabolism.
- Findingown data
In the BioFINDER CSF+/PET− group, a significant network component showed reduced connectivity associated with decreasing CSF Aβ42.
“In the CSF+/PET− group we found a significant network component where reduced connectivity was associated with decreasing levels of CSF Aβ42.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
As hypothesized, known regions of late stage Aβ accumulation were identified, including the sensorimotor cortex and occipital lobe.
“As hypothesized, we identified known regions of late stage Aβ accumulation, including the sensorimotor cortex and occipital lobe (Fig. 3, Supplementary Movie 2 and Table 3)3, 19.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Suva, D. et al. Primary motor cortex involvement in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 58, 1125–1134 (1999). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Braak, H. & Braak, E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 82, 239–259 (1991). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In ADNI, the FDG PET analysis comparing non-accumulators and late Aβ accumulators showed a temporal and to a lesser extent parietal reduction in metabolism in the non-demented late Aβ accumulators.
“The contrast is reduction in glucose metabolism in late compared with early Aβ accumulators and shows a temporal and to a lesser extent parietal reduction in metabolism in the non-demented late Aβ accumulators.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ADNI, late Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) showed a typical AD atrophy pattern compared with non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) in voxel-based morphometry over 2 years.
“The contrast is reduction in late compared with non-accumulators and shows a typical AD atrophy pattern in the non-demented late Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The early Aβ regions identified in this study were mainly located within the DMN.
“The early Aβ regions we identified were mainly located within the DMN (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Late Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) exhibited the expected longitudinal atrophy pattern over time involving mainly temporoparietal regions when compared to non-accumulators and early Aβ accumulators.
“In contrast, late Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) exhibited the expected longitudinal atrophy pattern of over time involving mainly temporoparietal regions when comparing them to non-accumulators (Fig. 4b) and early Aβ accumulators (Supplementary Fig. 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Atrophy is a marker of neuronal and synaptic degeneration.
- Findingown data
In the CSF-low/PET− group, the correlation was in the opposite direction, showing increased connectivity as CSF Aβ42 levels dropped from normal levels towards the abnormal cut-off.
“Interestingly, the correlation was in the opposite direction showing an increased connectivity as CSF Aβ42 levels dropped from normal levels towards the abnormal cut-off.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No clear atrophy pattern was seen in early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) compared with non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−).
“No clear atrophy pattern was seen in early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) compared with non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) (Fig. 4a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Atrophy is a marker of neuronal and synaptic degeneration.
- Findingown data
In BioFINDER, cross-sectional voxelwise comparisons between CSF+/PET− and CSF−/PET− subjects showed significant changes predominantly in the orbitofrontal cortex and posterior cingulate, similar to the longitudinal analyses in ADNI.
“Further, the cross-sectional voxelwise comparisons between CSF+/PET− and CSF−/PET− subjects in BioFINDER showed significant changes predominantly in the orbitofrontal cortex and posterior cingulate similar to the longitudinal analyses in ADNI (Fig. 5, compare with ADNI data in Fig. 1a, b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In BioFINDER, cross-sectional ROI-based analyses of 18F-flutemetamol SUVR identified similar early Aβ accumulation regions as in ADNI when comparing CSF+/PET− and CSF−/PET− subjects.
“Similar early Aβ accumulation regions were identified as in ADNI when comparing cross-sectional 18F-flutemetamol SUVRs between CSF+/PET− and CSF−/PET− subjects using ROI-based analyses in BioFINDER (Supplementary Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ADNI, the results showed significantly increased rates of Aβ fibril accumulation predominantly in the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, and orbitofrontal cortex in the early Aβ stage (CSF+/PET−).
“The results showed significantly increased rates of Aβ fibril accumulation predominantly in the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, and orbitofrontal cortex in this early Aβ stage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the CSF-low/PET− group, a significant network component involving the DMN was associated with CSF Aβ42, but with fewer constituent links than in the CSF+/PET− group.
“Furthermore, a significant network component involving the DMN was associated with CSF Aβ42 in the CSF-low/PET− group, but with fewer constituent links (Fig. 6b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the CSF-low/PET− group, decreasing Aβ42 was associated with increased connectivity in a qualitatively similar network component (r = −0.85, p < 0.001).
“By contrast, in the qualitatively similar network component of the CSF-low/PET− group, decreasing Aβ42 was instead associated with increased connectivity (b), r = −0.85, p < 0.001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In BioFINDER, the most significant early Aβ regions in the ROI-based analysis were the orbitofrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, and precuneus.
“The most significant regions were found in the orbitofrontal cortex, the posterior cingulate cortex, and the precuneus (Supplementary Table 3, which can be compared with ADNI data in Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ADNI, there was no significant difference in annual FDG PET change over 2 years between non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) and early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−).
“Voxelwise analysis of annual FDG PET change over 2 years in non-accumulators (n = 153) compared with early Aβ accumulators (n = 41). No significant difference is seen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In BioFINDER, the associations with hypoconnectivity and hyperconnectivity were similar when adjusting for CSF P-tau and T-tau.
“The associations with hypoconnectivity and hyperconnectivity were similar when adjusting for CSF P-tau and T-tau”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A cortical metabolic reduction in the temporal lobe was seen in late Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) compared with non-accumulators and early Aβ accumulators.
“There were no differences in FDG uptake over time between non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) and early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) (Fig. 4c), while a cortical metabolic reduction in the temporal lobe was seen in late Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET+) compared with non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−) (Fig. 4d) and early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) (Supplementary Fig. 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: FDG PET uptake reflects glucose metabolism/energy metabolism.
- Findingown data
In the CSF+/PET− group, the network component exhibited reduced connectivity with decreasing CSF Aβ42 (r = 0.91, p < 0.001).
“The network component of the CSF+/PET− group exhibited reduced connectivity with decreasing CSF Aβ42 (a), r = 0.91, p < 0.001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ADNI, over 2 years, early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−) showed no clear pattern of longitudinal cortical atrophy compared with non-accumulators (CSF−/PET−), after adjustment for age, gender, and intracranial volume.
“The contrast is reduction in cortical thickness in early compared with non-accumulators and shows no clear pattern of longitudinal atrophy in the early Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ADNI, the cut-off for abnormal Aβ PET SUVR was >0.872 SUVR using PVE correction and the composite reference region.
“This resulted in a cut-off of >0.872 SUVR for an abnormal Aβ PET using PVE correction and the composite reference region.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Because of limited statistical power (n = 11), there were no significant differences after multiple comparison correction in the CSF converter analysis.
“The group comparisons were still significant after adjustment of age, gender, and time between PET scans, but probably because of the limited statistical power (n = 11) there were no significant differences after multiple comparison correction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Individuals with AD may first be defined as CSF+/PET− and then progress to CSF+/PET+.
“This indicates that individuals with AD may first be defined as being CSF+/PET−, and then progress to CSF+/PET+.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Hansson, O. & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Cerebrospinal fluid analysis detects cerebral amyloid-beta accumulation earlier than positron emission tomography. Brain 139, 1226–1236 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Given agreement with previously identified regions, the identified regions in CSF converters were interpreted as true and not a statistical type 1 error.
“Given the agreement with the previously identified regions (Fig. 1a, b and Table 2), we interpreted the identified regions as true and not a statistical type 1 error.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Aβ42 levels decrease in the CSF as Aβ starts to accumulate, before fibrillar plaques can be detected with PET.
“Previous cross-sectional studies indicate that Aβ42 levels decrease in the CSF as Aβ starts to accumulate, before fibrillar plaques can be detected with PET7–11.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [7] Bateman, R. J. et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 795–804 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H. & Fagan, A. M. Fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, a006221 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Fagan, A. M. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid tau and ptau(181) increase with cortical amyloid deposition in cognitively normal individuals: implications for future clinical trials of Alzheimer’s disease. EMBO Mol. Med. 1, 371–380 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Mattsson, N. et al. Independent information from cerebrospinal fluid β-amyloid and florbetapir imaging in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 138, 772–783 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Morris, J. C. et al. APOE predicts amyloid-beta but not tau Alzheimer pathology in cognitively normal aging. Ann. Neurol. 67, 122–131 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The temporal sequence of Aβ accumulation preceding neurodegeneration strengthens the rationale for using CSF/PET groups as proxies for Aβ stages in AD.
“It also strengthens the rationale for using CSF/PET groups as proxies for Aβ stages in AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The temporal sequence of Aβ accumulation preceding neurodegeneration confirms the most acknowledged hypothetical model on the development of AD.
“The temporal sequence of Aβ accumulation preceding neurodegeneration confirms the most acknowledged hypothetical model on the development of AD1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Jack, C. R. Jr. et al. Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer’s disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 12, 207–216, (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
The early Aβ regions have been identified using PET ligands that bind primarily to dense-core Aβ aggregates and to a lesser extent or not at all to diffuse plaques.
“A limitation of our early Aβ regions is that they have been identified using PET ligands that bind to primarily dense-core Aβ aggregates and to a lesser extent or not at all to diffuse plaques39, 40.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [39] Scholl, M. et al. Low PiB PET retention in presence of pathologic CSF biomarkers in Arctic APP mutation carriers. Neurology 79, 229–236, (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Vandenberghe, R., Adamczuk, K., Dupont, P., Laere, K. V. & Chetelat, G. Amyloid PET in clinical practice: its place in the multidimensional space of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage Clin. 2, 497–511 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a subanalysis of a study aimed to identify different Aβ PET cut-offs, the first significant SUVR differences between controls and a group with sub-threshold SUVRs were located in the medial frontal cortex and the precuneus, similar to our early Aβ regions.
“They found that the first significant SUVR differences between the controls and a group with sub-threshold SUVRs were located in the medial frontal cortex and the precuneus, similar to our early Aβ regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Villeneuve, S. et al. Existing Pittsburgh Compound-B positron emission tomography thresholds are too high: statistical and pathological evaluation. Brain 138, 2020–2033 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The similarity of connectivity associations after adjusting for CSF P-tau and T-tau indicates an independent effect of Aβ on connectivity.
“indicating the independent effect of Aβ on the connectivity (Supplementary Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Those previous results indicate that there might have been methodological issues in correctly identifying the preclinical AD cases who have just started to accumulate Aβ.
“Those previous results indicate that there might have been methodological issues in correctly identifying the preclinical AD cases who have just started to accumulate Aβ.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
CSF+/PET− subjects are not all early Aβ accumulators since this state also can be caused by CSF analytical factors, failed PET scans, and medical conditions other than AD.
“Nonetheless, we acknowledge that CSF+/PET− subjects are not all early Aβ accumulators since this state also can be caused by CSF analytical factors, failed PET scans, and medical conditions other than AD36–38.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [36] Augutis, K. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of beta-amyloid metabolism in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 19, 543–552 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [37] Mattsson, N. et al. Reduced cerebrospinal fluid BACE1 activity in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 15, 448–454 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] van Westen, D. et al. Cerebral white matter lesions - associations with Abeta isoforms and amyloid PET. Sci. Rep. 6, 20709 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The early Aβ-accumulating brain regions remained significant when adjusting for confounding factors such as longitudinal changes in cortical thickness, APOE genotype and clinical status.
“In addition, the early Aβ-accumulating brain regions remained significant when adjusting for confounding factors such as longitudinal changes in cortical thickness, APOE genotype and clinical status.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Early stage accumulation is not related to a unique feature of the DMN, but in a more general sense to hubs in the brain with high connectivity.
“This indicates that early stage accumulation is not related to a unique feature of the DMN, but in a more general sense to hubs in the brain with high connectivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
About a third of MCI subjects have shown to be incorrectly diagnosed with cognitive impairment.
“We chose to include MCI subjects in addition to healthy controls since the cognitive impairment did not necessarily have to be caused by an underlying AD process and because about a third of MCI subjects have shown to be incorrectly diagnosed with cognitive impairment43–45.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [43] Bangen, K. J. et al. Cortical amyloid burden differences across empirically-derived mild cognitive impairment subtypes and interaction with APOE varepsilon4 genotype. J. Alzheimers Dis. 52, 849–861 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [44] Edmonds, E. C. et al. Susceptibility of the conventional criteria for mild cognitive impairment to false-positive diagnostic errors. Alzheimers Dement. 11, 415–424 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [45] Edmonds, E. C. et al. Subjective cognitive complaints contribute to misdiagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 20, 836–847 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Sub-threshold CSF Aβ42 levels indicate very early Aβ accumulation.
“Those with low levels of CSF Aβ42, but still within the normal range, have a high risk of becoming abnormal within the next couple of years13, which suggests that sub-threshold CSF Aβ42 levels indicate very early Aβ accumulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Mattsson, N. et al. Predicting reduction of cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid 42 in cognitively healthy controls. JAMA Neurol. 72, 554–560 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Those with low levels of CSF Aβ42, but still within the normal range, have a high risk of becoming abnormal within the next couple of years.
“Those with low levels of CSF Aβ42, but still within the normal range, have a high risk of becoming abnormal within the next couple of years13, which suggests that sub-threshold CSF Aβ42 levels indicate very early Aβ accumulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Mattsson, N. et al. Predicting reduction of cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid 42 in cognitively healthy controls. JAMA Neurol. 72, 554–560 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 31
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 43
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEarly Aβ accumulation predominantly overlapped with the DMN (Jaccard coefficient 0.14), but also with the frontoparietal network (JC 0.07).
“Figure 2 shows that early Aβ accumulation predominantly overlapped with the DMN (Jaccard coefficient, JC, 0.14), but also with the frontoparietal network (JC 0.07).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Yeo, B. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAdjusting for APOE genotype did not change the early Aβ pattern; the same regions as in Table 2 were found.
“Finally, we adjusted for APOE genotype to examine if different early Aβ patterns were observed depending on whether one carried an APOE ε4 allele, but the same regions as in Table 2 were found (details shown in Supplementary Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe earliest Aβ accumulation is associated with hypoconnectivity within the DMN and between the DMN and the frontoparietal network, but not with brain atrophy or glucose hypometabolism.
“The earliest Aβ accumulation is further associated with hypoconnectivity within the DMN and between the DMN and the frontoparietal network, but not with brain atrophy or glucose hypometabolism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo significant increase was seen in these regions among non-converters; mean rates were +0.3% (95% CI −0.24 to +0.90%) and +0.3% (95% CI −0.7 to +1.2%).
“No significant increase was seen in these regions among the non-converters and the corresponding mean rates were +0.3% (95% CI −0.24 to +0.90%) and +0.3% (95% CI −0.7 to +1.2%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe significant hypoconnectivity component in the CSF+/PET− group predominantly consisted of intra-DMN links, but also links between the DMN and the frontoparietal network.
“The component predominantly consisted of intra-DMN links, but also links between the DMN and the frontoparietal network (Fig. 6a).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“When we correlated whole-brain functional connectivity and CSF Aβ42 levels in the early stage Aβ accumulators (CSF+/PET−), we found a decreased connectivity in intra-DMN connections and between DMN and the frontoparietal network as CSF Aβ42 decreased (Fig. 6a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn BioFINDER, the highest significance for early Aβ regions was around the posterior regions of the cingulate cortex and the orbitofrontal cortex, similar to ADNI.
“The highest significance was seen around the posterior regions of the cingulate cortex and the orbitofrontal cortex similar to the results in ADNI (Fig. 1a, b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn BioFINDER, the significant network component associated with CSF Aβ42 was qualitatively similar for the CSF+/PET− and CSF-low/PET− groups and consisted mostly of intra- and inter-DMN connections.
“The connectograms show that the significant network component associated with CSF Aβ42 was qualitatively similar for the CSF+/PET− (a) and CSF-low/PET− (b) groups and consisted mostly of intra- and inter-DM connections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough the core DMN was the most prominent network with anatomical overlap with early Aβ regions, involvement of other networks was also evident, especially the frontoparietal network.
“Although the core DMN was the most prominent network that we found that had anatomical overlap with the early Aβ regions, we want to point out that involvement of other networks was also evident in the early Aβ accumulation, especially the frontoparietal network (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVoxelwise comparisons between early and late accumulators highlighted similar late regions, with greatest significant difference in the sensorimotor cortex and parts of the occipital lobe.
“The corresponding voxelwise comparisons between early and late accumulators are shown in Fig. 3 and highlight similar late regions (greatest significant difference in the sensorimotor cortex and parts of the occipital lobe).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe summed connectivity on the significant correlation component changed most drastically when CSF Aβ42 levels were closer to the cut-off (400-516 ng/L for the INNOTEST ELISA) and seemed to reach a floor effect as Aβ42 reached levels of around 350 ng/L.
“The summed connectivity on the significant correlation component changed most drastically when CSF Aβ42 levels were closer to the cut-off (400–516 ng/L for the INNOTEST ELISA) and seemed to reach a floor effect as Aβ42 reached levels of around 350 ng/L.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most prominent early Aβ-accumulating regions were the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, and the medial orbitofrontal cortex, possibly with an overlap to the anterior cingulate.
“The most prominent early Aβ-accumulating regions were the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, and the medial orbitofrontal cortex, possibly with an overlap to the anterior cingulate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe mean difference between baseline CSF sampling and the florbetapir PET scan was 9.6 days (range 0-110 days).
“The mean difference between baseline CSF sampling and the florbetapir PET scan was 9.6 days (ranging from 0 to 110 days).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataIn BioFINDER, mixture modeling determined the cut-offs for abnormal CSF Aβ42 (<517 ng/L) and abnormal Aβ PET (>0.759 SUVR).
“Mixture modeling was performed in the sample to determine the cut-offs for abnormal CSF Aβ42 (<517 ng/L) and abnormal Aβ PET (>0.759 SUVR).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo account for atrophy as a confounding factor, all significant models were adjusted for the annual change in cortical thickness of each ROI.
“To account for atrophy as a confounding factor, we also adjusted all significant models for the annual change in cortical thickness of each ROI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAccumulation of aggregated Aβ in the brain is believed to be the first pathological mechanism of Alzheimer's disease.
“Accumulation of aggregated amyloid-β (Aβ) in the brain is believed to be the first pathological mechanism of Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Jack, C. R. Jr. et al. Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer’s disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 12, 207–216, (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIn AD mutation-carriers, most cortical areas except the sensorimotor cortex show Aβ accumulation as early as 15 years before expected symptom onset.
“when analyzing the earliest data from AD mutation-carriers, most cortical areas except for the sensorimotor cortex showed Aβ accumulation as early as 15 years before the expected onset of symptoms6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Benzinger, T. L. et al. Regional variability of imaging biomarkers in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E4502–4509 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAll results were corrected for multiple comparisons and adjusted for gender, age, and time between PET scans.
“All results were corrected for multiple comparisons and adjusted for gender, age, and time between PET scans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCerebral deposition of Aβ fibrils can occur for decades before an individual with AD reaches the dementia stage.
“Previous studies have shown that cerebral deposition of Aβ fibrils can occur for decades before an individual with AD reaches the dementia stage2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Sperling, R., Mormino, E. & Johnson, K. The evolution of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: implications for prevention trials. Neuron 84, 608–622 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a prior longitudinal cohort of more than 400 non-demented individuals, those with abnormally low CSF Aβ42 but normal Aβ PET (CSF+/PET−) accumulated Aβ fibrils longitudinally at a similar rate as CSF+/PET+ and four times higher than CSF−/PET−.
“those with abnormally low CSF levels of Aβ42, but with still normal Aβ levels detected by PET (CSF+/PET−), accumulated Aβ fibrils longitudinally at a similar rate as those who had both abnormal CSF levels of Aβ42 and abnormal levels of Aβ detected by PET (CSF+/PET+) and four times higher than those with normal biomarker results on both parameters (CSF−/PET−)12.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Hansson, O. & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Cerebrospinal fluid analysis detects cerebral amyloid-beta accumulation earlier than positron emission tomography. Brain 139, 1226–1236 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe widespread cerebral distribution of Aβ in later AD stages is well-established.
“The widespread cerebral distribution of Aβ in later AD stages is well-established3, 4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Suva, D. et al. Primary motor cortex involvement in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 58, 1125–1134 (1999). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Villain, N. et al. Regional dynamics of amyloid-beta deposition in healthy elderly, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a voxelwise PiB-PET longitudinal study. Brain 135, 2126–2139 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe first neuropathological phase of Aβ in AD is characterized by Aβ deposits throughout the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital neocortex.
“it has been shown that the first phase is characterized by Aβ deposits throughout the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital neocortex5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Thal, D. R., Rub, U., Orantes, M. & Braak, H. Phases of A beta-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology 58, 1791–1800 (2002). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAβ fibrils start to accumulate predominantly within certain parts of the DMN in preclinical AD and already then affect brain connectivity.
“Our results suggest that Aβ fibrils start to accumulate predominantly within certain parts of the DMN in preclinical AD and already then affect brain connectivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe early Aβ regions are derived from group analyses, which show where Aβ is prone to start accumulating but do not exclude the possibility that accumulation might start in other regions in some individuals.
“It should be noted that the early Aβ regions are derived from group analyses, which show where Aβ is prone to start accumulating but they do not exclude the possibility that the accumulation might start in other regions in some individuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn BioFINDER, the voxelwise comparison in Fig. 5 used a two-sample t-test with significance threshold p < 0.001 and was adjusted for age and gender.
“Voxelwise two-sample t-test was used. The significance threshold was set at p < 0.001 and the comparison was adjusted for age and gender.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAnother cross-sectional study found an initial Aβ region involving the areas in Fig. 1a, but also affecting middle and inferior temporal regions, and superior and middle frontal regions.
“By assuming that earlier regions would show increased Aβ PET signal in a greater number of subjects, they found an initial Aβ region involving the areas in Fig. 1a, but also affecting middle and inferior temporal regions, and superior and middle frontal regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Cho, H. et al. In vivo cortical spreading pattern of tau and amyloid in the Alzheimer disease spectrum. Ann. Neurol. 80, 247–258 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe BioFINDER analysis included cross-sectional data and fewer subjects than ADNI, resulting in less statistical power.
“Note that the BioFINDER analysis included cross-sectional data and fewer subjects compared to ADNI, which results in less statistical power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious longitudinal studies have either failed to detect an early increase in regional Aβ deposition or identified a rather large early stage Aβ region including the posterior temporal, inferior parietal, posterior cingulate, precuneus, and occipital areas.
“Previous longitudinal studies have either failed to detect an early increase in regional Aβ deposition16 or identified a rather large early stage Aβ region including the posterior temporal, inferior parietal, posterior cingulate, precuneus, and occipital areas4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Villemagne, V. L. et al. Longitudinal assessment of Abeta and cognition in aging and Alzheimer disease. Ann. Neurol. 69, 181–192 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Villain, N. et al. Regional dynamics of amyloid-beta deposition in healthy elderly, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a voxelwise PiB-PET longitudinal study. Brain 135, 2126–2139 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe binding affinity of current PET ligands could explain some of the differences with neuropathological studies that use silver technique or anti-Aβ antibodies.
“The binding affinity of current PET ligands could explain some of the differences with neuropathological studies that either use silver technique19, which stain not only Aβ but also tau, or anti-Aβ antibodies5 that bind to specific Aβ epitopes and stain different Aβ forms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Braak, H. & Braak, E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 82, 239–259 (1991). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Thal, D. R., Rub, U., Orantes, M. & Braak, H. Phases of A beta-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology 58, 1791–1800 (2002). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe voxelwise analyses in Fig. 4 were adjusted for age and gender, and the VBM analysis was additionally adjusted for total intracranial volume.
“all results in a–d were adjusted for age and gender. The VBM analysis was also adjusted for total intracranial volume.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe DMN has a core network located in the posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, and medial prefrontal cortex.
“The DMN has a core network located in the posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, and medial prefrontal cortex20.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Smallwood, J. & Spreng, R. N. The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1316, 29–52 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationAn alternative explanation is that Aβ accumulation is caused by high metabolic demand and metabolic stress in these neurons and not neuronal activation per se.
“An alternative explanation is that Aβ accumulation is caused by the high metabolic demand and metabolic stress in these neurons (high energy consumption and frequent fluctuations in activation and deactivation) and not the neuronal activation per se30.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Lehmann, M. et al. Intrinsic connectivity networks in healthy subjects explain clinical variability in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11606–11611 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a recent study, CSF+/PET− subjects accumulated Aβ at a similar rate as CSF+/PET+ subjects and about four times higher than CSF−/PET− subjects.
“In a recent study, we also showed that CSF+/PET− subjects accumulated Aβ at a similar rate as CSF+/PET+ subjects and about four times higher than CSF−/PET− subjects12.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Hansson, O. & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Cerebrospinal fluid analysis detects cerebral amyloid-beta accumulation earlier than positron emission tomography. Brain 139, 1226–1236 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA certain overlap between the DMN and the distribution of Aβ fibrils in AD has been noted in previous publications.
“A certain overlap between the DMN and the distribution of Aβ fibrils in AD has also been noted in previous publications23–26.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [23] Buckner, R. L. et al. Molecular, structural, and functional characterization of Alzheimer’s disease: evidence for a relationship between default activity, amyloid, and memory. J. Neurosci. 25, 7709–7717 (2005). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Sperling, R. A. et al. Amyloid deposition is associated with impaired default network function in older persons without dementia. Neuron 63, 178–188 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Myers, N. et al. Within-patient correspondence of amyloid-beta and intrinsic network connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 137, 2052–2064 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Becker, A., Sperling, R. & Johnson, K. A. In vivo characterization of the early states of the amyloid-beta network. Brain 136, 2239–2252 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese adjustments show that the results were not confounded by differences in atrophy between the groups or differences between healthy controls and MCI subjects.
“These adjustments show that the results were not confounded by differences in atrophy between the groups or differences between healthy controls and MCI subjects (discussed further in the Methods section).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown dataThe correlation between disruption of functional connectivity and Aβ pathology has recently been described in AD, but this study is the first to show that this association is present already at the very earliest preclinical stages of AD when Aβ fibrils are just starting to accumulate.
“This correlation between the disruption of functional connectivity and Aβ pathology has recently been described in AD32, 33, but to our knowledge the present study is the first to show that this association is present already at the very earliest preclinical stages of AD when Aβ fibrils are just starting to accumulate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [32] Elman, J. A. et al. Effects of beta-amyloid on resting state functional connectivity within and between networks reflect known patterns of regional vulnerability. Cereb. Cortex 26, 695–707 (2016).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Koch, K. et al. Disrupted intrinsic networks link amyloid-beta pathology and impaired cognition in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Cereb. Cortex 25, 4678–4688 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataAge, gender, and APOE ε4 status were controlled for by partial correlation in the BioFINDER connectivity analyses.
“Age, gender, and APOE ε4 status was controlled for by partial correlation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationOne explanation for Aβ aggregation within the DMN is that deposition of Aβ fibrils could be caused by high neuronal activity within the DMN, supported by animal studies showing Aβ secretion and deposition is enhanced by neuronal activity.
“One explanation is that the deposition of Aβ fibrils could be caused by the high neuronal activity within the DMN, which is supported by animal studies showing that Aβ secretion and deposition is enhanced by neuronal activity27–29.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [27] Cirrito, J. R. et al. Endocytosis is required for synaptic activity-dependent release of amyloid-beta in vivo. Neuron 58, 42–51 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Kamenetz, F. et al. APP processing and synaptic function. Neuron 37, 925–937 (2003). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Li, X. et al. Neuronal activity and secreted amyloid beta lead to altered amyloid beta precursor protein and presenilin 1 interactions. Neurobiol. Dis. 50, 127–134 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWe cannot pinpoint the exact Aβ forms within the early Aβ regions, nor can we say if Aβ aggregates not detected by PET are present in other areas of the brain at this early stage.
“We can therefore not pinpoint the exact Aβ forms within the early Aβ regions, neither can we say if Aβ aggregates not detected by PET are present in other areas of the brain at this early stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn neuropathological studies, one study reported that the presumably first Aβ phase had Aβ deposits throughout the neocortex, while Braak & Braak showed an early pattern of Aβ deposits in the basal parts of the medial and anterior regions of the prefrontal cortex, and the basal anterior temporal lobe.
“One study reported that the presumably first Aβ phase had Aβ deposits throughout the neocortex5, while a prior publication by Braak & Braak19 showed an early pattern of Aβ deposits in the basal parts of the medial and anterior regions of the prefrontal cortex, and the basal anterior temporal lobe.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] Thal, D. R., Rub, U., Orantes, M. & Braak, H. Phases of A beta-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology 58, 1791–1800 (2002). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Braak & Braak19
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe differences between neuropathological studies are probably partly explained by different staining methods and their affinity to different Aβ forms.
“The differences are probably partly explained by the different staining methods and their affinity to different Aβ forms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMixture modeling provides an unbiased threshold for abnormality and is a well-established method for defining Aβ PET cut-offs.
“Mixture modeling statistics provide an unbiased threshold for abnormality (i.e., the diagnosis or status is not used in analysis) and it is a well-established method for defining Aβ PET cut-offs12, 17, 60, 61.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [12] Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Hansson, O. & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Cerebrospinal fluid analysis detects cerebral amyloid-beta accumulation earlier than positron emission tomography. Brain 139, 1226–1236 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Villeneuve, S. et al. Existing Pittsburgh Compound-B positron emission tomography thresholds are too high: statistical and pathological evaluation. Brain 138, 2020–2033 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [60] Palmqvist, S. et al. Accuracy of brain amyloid detection in clinical practice using cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid 42: a cross-validation study against amyloid positron emission tomography. JAMA Neurol. 71, 1282–1289 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [61] Toledo, J. B. et al. Nonlinear association between cerebrospinal fluid and florbetapir F-18 beta-amyloid measures across the spectrum of Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 72, 571–581 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll results were adjusted for gender and age and, in the longitudinal analyses, time between Aβ PET examinations.
“All results were adjusted for gender and age and, in the longitudinal analyses, time between Aβ PET examinations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationPartial volume error correction was performed for florbetapir SUVRs with the geometric transfer matrix method using Freesurfer segmented regions, and all florbetapir results shown in tables and figures are from PVE corrected data.
“Partial volume error (PVE) correction was performed for florbetapir SUVRs with the geometric transfer matrix (GTM) method51 using Freesurfer segmented regions52 (all florbetapir results shown in the tables and figures are from PVE corrected data).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [51] Rousset, O. G., Ma, Y. & Evans, A. C. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. J. Nucl. Med. 39, 904–911 (1998).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [52] Han, X. & Fischl, B. Atlas renormalization for improved brain MR image segmentation across scanner platforms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26, 479–486 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationOutliers in whole-brain voxel-to-voxel BOLD-signal correlations were removed to control for motion-induced global signal confound.
“As an extra precautionary step, the voxel-to-voxel BOLD-signal correlations across the whole brain (including GM, WM, and CSF) was calculated and summed. Outliers in this measure likely originate in a motion-induced global signal confound capable of eluding conventional motion estimation70 and were removed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] He, H. & Liu, T. T. A geometric view of global signal confounds in resting-state functional MRI. NeuroImage 59, 2339–2348 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe variance of the SUVRs were similar in each group.
“The variance of the SUVRs were similar in each group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenOriginal p values are presented for ROI-based analyses but are only reported as significant if they are significant after FDR correction.
“Original p values are presented for the ROI-based analyses but are only reported as significant if they are significant after the FDR correction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe resulting t-maps were thresholded to present results with p < 0.001 height, uncorrected for family-wise error, and k > 100 voxels cluster extent.
“The resulting t-maps were thresholded to present results with a p < 0.001 height, uncorrected for family-wise error, and a k > 100 voxels cluster extent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataAge, gender and APOE ε4 status were controlled for by partial correlation in the network component analysis.
“Age, gender and APOE ε4 status was controlled for by partial correlation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationTo control for multiple testing in ROI-based analyses, the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure with a conservative false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05 was used.
“To control for multiple testing in the ROI-based analyses we used the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure with a conservative false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05 (not to be confused with a p value of 0.05)74.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, J. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. 57, 289–300 (1995). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe models were adjusted for clinical status (MCI/healthy control) in subanalyses.
“To account for this inclusion the models were adjusted for clinical status (MCI/healthy control) in subanalyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe component size was compared to a permutation-generated null distribution, controlling for family-wise error rate at α = 0.05.
“The component size was compared to a permutation-generated null distribution of sizes, thus controlling for the family-wise error rate in the weak sense at α = 0.05”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAdditional analyses adjusted for changes in cortical thickness over 2 years in each ROI and clinical status (healthy control/MCI).
“We also performed additional analyses adjusting for changes in cortical thickness over 2 years in each ROI and clinical status (healthy control/MCI) in addition to the above covariates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study subjects gave written informed consent and the study was approved by each participating site's Institutional Review Board.
“Study subjects gave written informed consent and the study was approved by each participating site’s Institutional Review Board.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataVoxelwise two-sample t-test and multiple regressions used age, gender, and ICV as covariates.
“We employed voxelwise two-sample t-test and multiple regressions using age, gender, and ICV (for analyses involving VBM data) as covariates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAbnormal CSF Aβ42 values were defined using the previously established cut-off of <192 ng/L.
“Abnormal CSF Aβ42 values were defined using the previously established cut-off of <192 ng/L57–59.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [57] Shaw, L. M. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative subjects. Ann. Neurol. 65, 403–413 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [58] De Meyer, G. et al. Diagnosis-independent Alzheimer disease biomarker signature in cognitively normal elderly people. Arch. Neurol. 67, 949–956 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [59] Weigand, S. D. et al. Transforming cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 measures into calculated Pittsburgh Compound B units of brain Abeta amyloid. Alzheimers Dement. 7, 133–141 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataA strength of the methodology is that similar early Aβ regions were detected in two different cohorts using two different types of PET ligands; 18F-florbetapir and 18F-flutemetamol.
“Nonetheless, a strength of the methodology is that we could detect similar early Aβ regions in two different cohorts using two different types of PET ligands; 18F-florbetapir (a stilbene compound) and 18F-flutemetamol (an 18F-labeled analog of 11C-Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) derived from thioflavin T)40.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Vandenberghe, R., Adamczuk, K., Dupont, P., Laere, K. V. & Chetelat, G. Amyloid PET in clinical practice: its place in the multidimensional space of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage Clin. 2, 497–511 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOur data indicated that Aβ starts accumulating before overt metabolic changes or atrophy, and that hypoconnectivity within the early Aβ-accumulating regions has already occurred when Aβ fibrils just starts to accumulate.
“Our data indicated that Aβ starts accumulating before overt metabolic changes or atrophy, and that hypoconnectivity within the early Aβ-accumulating regions has already occurred when Aβ fibrils just starts to accumulate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenOnly Aβ PET negative subjects were used in the connectivity analysis.
“Only Aβ PET negative subjects were used in the connectivity analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataBecause of the limited number of subjects in the subanalysis of 'CSF converters' (n = 11), non-parametric statistics were primarily used for this subgroup.
“Because of the limited number of subjects in the subanalysis of “CSF converters” (n = 11), we primarily used non-parametric statistics for this subgroup (the Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed rank test).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataFor the resting-state correlation analysis, a component was assigned a p value as a whole based on component size relative a permutation-generated null distribution, correcting for family-wise error in the weak sense.
“For the resting-state correlation analysis, a component (consisting a connected set of links correlating with CSF biomarker levels above a p = 0.001 threshold) was assigned a p value as a whole based on the component size relative a permutation-generated null distribution, thus correcting for family-wise cerror in the weak sense”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationFor florbetapir, the reference region consisted of the whole cerebellum, the pons/brainstem region, and eroded cortical white matter as this composite region has produced more reliable results in longitudinal analyses.
“For florbetapir, the reference region consisted of the whole cerebellum, the pons/brainstem region, and eroded cortical white matter as this composite region has produced more reliable results in longitudinal analyses49.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Landau, S. M. et al. Measurement of longitudinal beta-amyloid change with 18F-florbetapir PET and standardized uptake value ratios. J. Nucl. Med. 56, 567–574 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationSubjects with a mean/maximum frame-wise displacement exceeding 0.6/3.0 mm were excluded.
“Subjects with a mean/maximum frame-wise displacement29, 69 exceeding 0.6/3.0 mm were excluded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] Li, X. et al. Neuronal activity and secreted amyloid beta lead to altered amyloid beta precursor protein and presenilin 1 interactions. Neurobiol. Dis. 50, 127–134 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [69] Friston, K. J., Williams, S., Howard, R., Frackowiak, R. S. & Turner, R. Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn. Reson. Med. 35, 346–355 (1996). source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Atrophy is a marker of neuronal and synaptic degeneration.
“To test the hypothesis that atrophy, as a marker of neuronal and synaptic degeneration, starts after the initiation of Aβ accumulation, we compared the longitudinal change in gray matter (GM) volumes between the CSF/PET groups using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis (Fig. 4a, b and Supplementary Fig. 2A).”
The paper relies on this without support.
FDG PET uptake reflects glucose metabolism/energy metabolism.
“Similar analyses were made with longitudinal FDG PET data to examine changes in glucose metabolism in relation to early Aβ accumulation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Regional differences in Aβ deposition should still be noticeable when comparing CSF+/PET− and CSF−/PET− subjects cross-sectionally.
“Although longitudinal comparisons are preferred given our hypothesis, regional differences in Aβ deposition should still be noticeable when comparing CSF+/PET− and CSF−/PET− subjects cross-sectionally.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CSF and plasma samples were collected and analyzed following a standardized protocol.
“CSF and plasma samples were collected and analyzed following a standardized protocol (Palmqvist et al, 2017).”
From The genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid (2023) · cites this paper as Palmqvist et al, 2017
The Methods sections on CSF biomarkers and the BioFINDER study describe CSF sampling and specify the assays used to analyze CSF biomarkers (page numbers unavailable). They do not describe plasma sample collection or analysis, or establish that both sample types followed a standardized protocol. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThis finding was reported in individuals with seemingly normal levels of Aβ in both PET and CSF biomarkers (PET-/CSF-) but who later progressed to exhibiting abnormal levels of CSF Aβ (PET-/CSF+).
“This finding was even reported in individuals with seemingly normal levels of Aβ in both PET and CSF biomarkers (PET-/CSF-) but who later progressed to exhibiting abnormal levels of CSF Aβ (PET-/CSF+).”
From Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau231 as an early indicator of emerging pathology in Alzheimer's disease (2022) · cites this paper as [59]
Aβ fibrils begin to accumulate early in core regions of the default mode network (DMN), namely precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, and orbitofrontal cortex.
“Previously, Palmqvist et al.59 showed that Aβ fibrils begin to accumulate early in core regions of default mode network (DMN), namely precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, and orbitofrontal cortex.”
From Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau231 as an early indicator of emerging pathology in Alzheimer's disease (2022) · cites this paper as [59]
The precuneus is one of the nodes of the default mode network, where early deposition of Aβ occurs.
“Interestingly, the precuneus is one the nodes of the default mode network, where early deposition of Aβ occurs.46”
From CSF biomarkers of neuroinflammation and cerebrovascular dysfunction in early Alzheimer disease (2018) · cites this paper as [46]
An unbiased cutoff of less than 0.059 was used to define Aβ positivity based on mixture modeling statistics, which previously has proved to provide robust and accurate thresholds.
“An unbiased cutoff of less than 0.059 was used to define Aβ positivity based on mixture modeling statistics, which previously has proved to provide robust and accurate thresholds.35,36”
From Performance of Fully Automated Plasma Assays as Screening Tests for Alzheimer Disease–Related β-Amyloid Status (2019) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Figure 4d names different comparison groups
MinorThe caption first says Figure 4d compares late accumulators with non-accumulators, then describes its contrast as late versus early accumulators.
“d The same FDG PET analysis as above, but with a comparison between non-accumulators and late Aβ accumulators (n = 124).”
“The contrast is reduction in glucose metabolism in late compared with early Aβ accumulators”
CSF-low group has conflicting concentration units
MinorThe same CSF Aβ42 range defining the CSF-low/PET− group is given in ng/L in the figure caption but in μg/mL in Methods. Those units differ by a factor of one million.
“CSF-low normal CSF Aβ42 levels close to the abnormal cut-off (517–750 ng/L)”
“This group was characterized as Aβ PET negative with CSF Aβ42 between 517–750 μg/mL (CSF−low/PET−).”
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482 · see citing works
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282 · see citing works
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 21,010 · see citing works
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589 · see citing works
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,803 · see citing works
Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate of a Fall Sensor in Long-Term Fall Detection in the Elderly
Kangas, M., Korpelainen, R., Vikman, I., Nyberg, L., & Jämsä, T. J. (2014) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000362720 · Cited by 19,003 · see citing works
Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1991) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00308809 · Cited by 16,123 · see citing works
Desikan, R. S., Ségonne, F., Fischl, B., Quinn, B. T., Dickerson, B. C., Blacker, D., Buckner, R. L., Dale, A. M., Maguire, R. P., Hyman, B. T., et al. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 · Cited by 13,324 · see citing works
Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W., & Smith, S. M. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 · Cited by 11,314 · see citing works
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913 · see citing works
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules
Morris, J. C. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a · Cited by 9,882 · see citing works
The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
Thomas Yeo, B. T., Krienen, F. M., Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Lashkari, D., Hollinshead, M., Roffman, J. L., Smoller, J. W., Zöllei, L., Polimeni, J. R., et al. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00338.2011 · Cited by 9,182 · see citing works
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018 · Cited by 7,429 · see citing works
The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
Buckner, R. L., Krienen, F. M., Castellanos, A., Diaz, J. C., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00339.2011 · Cited by 7,304 · see citing works
A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI
Behzadi, Y., Restom, K., Liau, J., & Liu, T. T. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042 · Cited by 4,502 · see citing works
Jack, C. R., Knopman, D. S., Jagust, W. J., Petersen, R. C., Weiner, M. W., Aisen, P. S., Shaw, L. M., Vemuri, P., Wiste, H. J., Weigand, S. D., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70291-0 · Cited by 4,396 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods
Jack, C. R., Bernstein, M. A., Fox, N. C., Thompson, P., Alexander, G., Harvey, D., Borowski, B., Britson, P. J., L. Whitwell, J., Ward, C., et al. (2008) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.21049 · Cited by 4,347 · see citing works
The brain's default mode network
Raichle, M. E. (2015) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030 · Cited by 3,904 · see citing works
Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease
Bateman, R. J., Xiong, C., Benzinger, T. L. S., Fagan, A. M., Goate, A., Fox, N. C., Marcus, D. S., Cairns, N. J., Xie, X., Blazey, T. M., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1202753 · Cited by 3,814 · see citing works
Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series
Friston, K. J., Williams, S., Howard, R., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Turner, R. (1996) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910350312 · Cited by 3,774 · see citing works
Phases of Aβ-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD
Thal, D. R., Rüb, U., Orantes, M., & Braak, H. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.58.12.1791 · Cited by 3,490 · see citing works
Buckner, R. L., Sepulcre, J., Talukdar, T., Krienen, F. M., Liu, H., Hedden, T., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Sperling, R. A., & Johnson, K. A. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5062-08.2009 · Cited by 2,862 · see citing works
Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks
Zalesky, A., Fornito, A., & Bullmore, E. T. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.041 · Cited by 2,750 · see citing works
Buckner, R. L., Snyder, A. Z., Shannon, B. J., LaRossa, G., Sachs, R., Fotenos, A. F., Sheline, Y. I., Klunk, W. E., Mathis, C. A., Morris, J. C., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2177-05.2005 · Cited by 2,140 · see citing works
Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., Smallwood, J., & Spreng, R. N. (2014) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12360 · Cited by 2,102 · see citing works
Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative subjects
Shaw, L. M., Vanderstichele, H., Knapik‐Czajka, M., Clark, C. M., Aisen, P. S., Petersen, R. C., Blennow, K., Soares, H., Simon, A., Lewczuk, P., et al. (2009) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21610 · Cited by 2,065 · see citing works
Self-citationAPP Processing and Synaptic Function
Kamenetz, F., Tomita, T., Hsieh, H., Seabrook, G., Borchelt, D., Iwatsubo, T., Sisodia, S., & Malinow, R. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00124-7 · Cited by 1,644 · see citing works
The Centiloid Project: standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET
Klunk, W. E., Koeppe, R. A., Price, J. C., Benzinger, T. L., Devous, M. D., Jagust, W. J., Johnson, K. A., Mathis, C. A., Minhas, D., Pontecorvo, M. J., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.07.003 · Cited by 1,348 · see citing works
Self-citationSperling, R. A., LaViolette, P. S., O'Keefe, K., O'Brien, J., Rentz, D. M., Pihlajamaki, M., Marshall, G., Hyman, B. T., Selkoe, D. J., Hedden, T., et al. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.003 · Cited by 1,027 · see citing works
Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation.
ROUSSET, O. G., Ma, Y., & Evans, A. C. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 919 · see citing works
Neuronal activity regulates the regional vulnerability to amyloid-β deposition
Bero, A. W., Yan, P., Roh, J. H., Cirrito, J. R., Stewart, F. R., Raichle, M. E., Lee, J.-M., & Holtzman, D. M. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2801 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
Longitudinal assessment of Aβ and cognition in aging and Alzheimer disease
Villemagne, V. L., Pike, K. E., Chételat, G., Ellis, K. A., Mulligan, R. S., Bourgeat, P., Ackermann, U., Jones, G., Szoeke, C., Salvado, O., et al. (2011) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22248 · Cited by 833 · see citing works
<i>APOE</i> predicts amyloid‐beta but not tau Alzheimer pathology in cognitively normal aging
Morris, J. C., Roe, C. M., Xiong, C., Fagan, A. M., Goate, A. M., Holtzman, D. M., & Mintun, M. A. (2010) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21843 · Cited by 830 · see citing works
The Evolution of Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease: Implications for Prevention Trials
Sperling, R., Mormino, E., & Johnson, K. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.038 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Busche, M. A., Chen, X., Henning, H. A., Reichwald, J., Staufenbiel, M., Sakmann, B., & Konnerth, A. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1206171109 · Cited by 715 · see citing works
The Insight ToolKit image registration framework
Avants, B. B., Tustison, N. J., Stauffer, M., Song, G., Wu, B., & Gee, J. C. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2014.00044 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
Endocytosis Is Required for Synaptic Activity-Dependent Release of Amyloid-β In Vivo
Cirrito, J. R., Kang, J.-E., Lee, J., Stewart, F. R., Verges, D. K., Silverio, L. M., Bu, G., Mennerick, S., & Holtzman, D. M. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.02.003 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Persistent default‐mode network connectivity during light sedation
Greicius, M. D., Kiviniemi, V. J., Tervonen, O. A., Vainionpää, V., Alahuhta, S., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20537 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
In vivo cortical spreading pattern of tau and amyloid in the Alzheimer disease spectrum
Cho, H., Choi, J. Y., Hwang, M. S., Kim, Y. J., Lee, H. M., Lee, H. S., Lee, J. H., Ryu, Y. H., Lee, M. S., & Lyoo, C. H. (2016) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24711 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Diagnosis-Independent Alzheimer Disease Biomarker Signature in Cognitively Normal Elderly People
De Meyer, G. (2010) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2010.179 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Olsson, A., Vanderstichele, H., Andreasen, N., Meyer, G. D., Wallin, A., Holmberg, B., Rosengren, L., Vanmechelen, E., & Blennow, K. (2004) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2004.039347 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Self-citationVilleneuve, S., Rabinovici, G. D., Cohn-Sheehy, B. I., Madison, C., Ayakta, N., Ghosh, P. M., La Joie, R., Arthur-Bentil, S. K., Vogel, J. W., Marks, S. M., et al. (2015) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awv112 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Self-citationPalmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Hansson, O., & Initiative, F. T. A. D. N. (2016) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aww015 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Self-citationRegional variability of imaging biomarkers in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease
Benzinger, T. L. S., Blazey, T., Jack, C. R., Koeppe, R. A., Su, Y., Xiong, C., Raichle, M. E., Snyder, A. Z., Ances, B. M., Bateman, R. J., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1317918110 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Detailed comparison of amyloid PET and CSF biomarkers for identifying early Alzheimer disease
Palmqvist, S., Zetterberg, H., Mattsson, N., Johansson, P., Initiative, F. T. A. D. N., Minthon, L., Blennow, K., Olsson, M., For the Swedish BioFINDER study group, Hansson, O., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001991 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Self-citationPalmqvist, S., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Vestberg, S., Andreasson, U., Brooks, D. J., Owenius, R., Hägerström, D., Wollmer, P., Minthon, L., et al. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1358 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Self-citationLandau, S. M., Fero, A., Baker, S. L., Koeppe, R., Mintun, M., Chen, K., Reiman, E. M., & Jagust, W. J. (2015) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.114.148981 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Self-citationFagan, A. M., Mintun, M. A., Shah, A. R., Aldea, P., Roe, C. M., Mach, R. H., Marcus, D., Morris, J. C., & Holtzman, D. M. (2009) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1002/emmm.200900048 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Thomas, B. A., Erlandsson, K., Marc Modat, A., Thurfjell, L., Vandenberghe, R. R., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Hutton, B. F. (2011) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-011-1745-9 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Edmonds, E. C., Delano‐Wood, L., Clark, L. R., Jak, A. J., Nation, D. A., McDonald, C. R., Libon, D. J., Au, R., Galasko, D., Salmon, D. P., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.03.005 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Villain, N., Chételat, G., Grassiot, B., Bourgeat, P., Jones, G., Ellis, K. A., Ames, D., Martins, R. N., Eustache, F., Salvado, O., et al. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws125 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Subjective Cognitive Complaints Contribute to Misdiagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Edmonds, E. C., Delano-Wood, L., Galasko, D. R., Salmon, D. P., & Bondi, M. W. (2014) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s135561771400068x · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Mattsson, N., Insel, P. S., Donohue, M., Landau, S., Jagust, W. J., Shaw, L. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., & Weiner, M. W. (2015) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awu367 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citationAntibody-based PET imaging of amyloid beta in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease
Sehlin, D., Fang, X. T., Cato, L., Antoni, G., Lannfelt, L., & Syvänen, S. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10759 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Atlas Renormalization for Improved Brain MR Image Segmentation Across Scanner Platforms
Han, X., & Fischl, B. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2007.893282 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Fluid Biomarkers in Alzheimer Disease
Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., & Fagan, A. M. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006221 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citationSchöll, M., Wall, A., Thordardottir, S., Ferreira, D., Bogdanovic, N., Långström, B., Almkvist, O., Graff, C., & Nordberg, A. (2012) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31825fdf18 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationWithin-patient correspondence of amyloid-β and intrinsic network connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease
Myers, N., Pasquini, L., Göttler, J., Grimmer, T., Koch, K., Ortner, M., Neitzel, J., Mühlau, M., Förster, S., Kurz, A., et al. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awu103 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Lehmann, M., Madison, C. M., Ghosh, P. M., Seeley, W. W., Mormino, E., Greicius, M. D., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Kramer, J. H., Miller, B. L., Jagust, W. J., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1221536110 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationElman, J. A., Madison, C. M., Baker, S. L., Vogel, J. W., Marks, S. M., Crowley, S., O’Neil, J. P., & Jagust, W. J. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu259 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationIn vivo characterization of the early states of the amyloid-beta network
Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Becker, A., Sperling, R., & Johnson, K. A. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt146 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Primary Motor Cortex Involvement in Alzheimer Disease
Suvà, D., Favre, I., Kraftsik, R., Esteban, M., Lobrinus, A., & Miklossy, J. (1999) · Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/00005072-199911000-00002 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Amyloid PET in clinical practice: Its place in the multidimensional space of Alzheimer's disease
Vandenberghe, R., Adamczuk, K., Dupont, P., Laere, K. V., & Chételat, G. (2013) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.014 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Koch, K., Myers, N. E., Göttler, J., Pasquini, L., Grimmer, T., Förster, S., Manoliu, A., Neitzel, J., Kurz, A., Förstl, H., et al. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu151 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
A geometric view of global signal confounds in resting-state functional MRI
He, H., & Liu, T. T. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.018 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Weigand, S. D., Vemuri, P., Wiste, H. J., Senjem, M. L., Pankratz, V. S., Aisen, P. S., Weiner, M. W., Petersen, R. C., Shaw, L. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2010.08.230 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Toledo, J. B., Bjerke, M., Da, X., Landau, S. M., Foster, N. L., Jagust, W., Jack, C., Weiner, M., Davatzikos, C., Shaw, L. M., et al. (2015) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4829 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Self-citationEmerging β-amyloid pathology and accelerated cortical atrophy
Mattsson, N., Insel, P. S., Nosheny, R., Tosun, D., Trojanowski, J. Q., Shaw, L. M., Jack, C. R., Donohue, M. C., & Weiner, M. W. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.446 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationCerebral white matter lesions – associations with Aβ isoforms and amyloid PET
van Westen, D., Lindqvist, D., Blennow, K., Minthon, L., Nägga, K., Stomrud, E., Zetterberg, H., & Hansson, O. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20709 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationReduced cerebrospinal fluid BACE1 activity in multiple sclerosis
Mattsson, N., Axelsson, M., Haghighi, S., Malmeström, C., Wu, G., Anckarsäter, R., Sankaranarayanan, S., Andreasson, U., Fredrikson, S., Gundersen, A., et al. (2009) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458508100031 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationBangen, K. J., Initiative, F. T. A. D. N., Clark, A. L., Werhane, M., Edmonds, E. C., Nation, D. A., Evangelista, N., Libon, D. J., Bondi, M. W., & Delano-Wood, L. (2016) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-150900 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of β-amyloid metabolism in multiple sclerosis
Augutis, K., Axelsson, M., Portelius, E., Brinkmalm, G., Andreasson, U., Gustavsson, M. K., Malmeström, C., Lycke, J., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., et al. (2013) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458512460603 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationPredicting Reduction of Cerebrospinal Fluid β-Amyloid 42 in Cognitively Healthy Controls
Mattsson, N., Insel, P. S., Donohue, M., Jagust, W., Sperling, R., Aisen, P., & Weiner, M. W. (2015) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4530 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, X., Uemura, K., Hashimoto, T., Nasser-Ghodsi, N., Arimon, M., Lill, C. M., Palazzolo, I., Krainc, D., Hyman, B. T., & Berezovska, O. (2013) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2012.10.002 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Rasmussen, J. M., Lakatos, A., van Erp, T. G. M., Kruggel, F., Keator, D. B., Fallon, J., Macciardi, F. M., & Potkin, S. G. (2011) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.09.008 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Grabner, G., Janke, A. L., Budge, M. M., Smith, D., Pruessner, J., & Collins, D. L. in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention -- MICCAI 2006: 9th International Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, October 1-6, 2006. Proceedings, Part II. (eds Larsen, R., Nielsen, M. & Sporring J.) 58–66 (Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2006).
- Avants, B. B. et al. The Insight ToolKit image registration framework. Front. Neuroinform. 8, 44 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Friston, K. J., Williams, S., Howard, R., Frackowiak, R. S. & Turner, R. Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn. Reson. Med. 35, 346–355 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lefaucheur, J.-P., Aleman, A., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Brunelin, J., Di Lazzaro, V., Filipović, S. R., Grefkes, C., Hasan, A., Hummel, F. C., et al. (2020) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002 · Cited by 2,382 · see citing works
The Amyloid-β Pathway in Alzheimer’s Disease
Hampel, H., Hardy, J., Blennow, K., Chen, C., Perry, G., Kim, S. H., Villemagne, V. L., Aisen, P., Vendruscolo, M., Iwatsubo, T., et al. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01249-0 · Cited by 1,952 · see citing works
Self-citationJanelidze, S., Mattsson, N., Palmqvist, S., Smith, R., Beach, T. G., Serrano, G. E., Chai, X., Proctor, N. K., Eichenlaub, U., Zetterberg, H., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0755-1 · Cited by 1,247 · see citing works
Self-citationBiomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases
Hansson, O. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01382-x · Cited by 1,159 · see citing works
Self-citationPlasma p-tau231: a new biomarker for incipient Alzheimer’s disease pathology.
Ashton, N. J., Pascoal, T. A., Karikari, T. K., Benedet, A. L., Lantero-Rodriguez, J., Brinkmalm, G., Snellman, A., Schöll, M., Troakes, C., Hye, A., et al. (2021) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-021-02275-6 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Self-citationNew insights into atypical Alzheimer's disease in the era of biomarkers
Graff-Radford, J., Yong, K. X. X., Apostolova, L. G., Bouwman, F. H., Carrillo, M., Dickerson, B. C., Rabinovici, G. D., Schott, J. M., Jones, D. T., & Murray, M. E. (2021) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30440-3 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
Imaging the evolution and pathophysiology of Alzheimer disease
Jagust, W. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0067-3 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Self-citationA multicentre validation study of the diagnostic value of plasma neurofilament light.
Ashton, N. J., Janelidze, S., Al Khleifat, A., Leuzy, A., van der Ende, E. L., Karikari, T. K., Benedet, A. L., Pascoal, T. A., Lleó, A., Parnetti, L., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23620-z · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Self-citationPalmqvist, S., Tideman, P., Cullen, N., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Initiative, T. A. D. N., Dage, J. L., Stomrud, E., Janelidze, S., Mattsson-Carlgren, N., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01348-z · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Self-citationPalmqvist, S., Janelidze, S., Stomrud, E., Zetterberg, H., Karl, J., Zink, K., Bittner, T., Mattsson, N., Eichenlaub, U., Blennow, K., et al. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1632 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Self-citationPropagation and spread of pathogenic protein assemblies in neurodegenerative diseases
Jucker, M., & Walker, L. C. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0238-6 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
CSF biomarkers of neuroinflammation and cerebrovascular dysfunction in early Alzheimer disease
Janelidze, S., Mattsson, N., Stomrud, E., Lindberg, O., Palmqvist, S., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., & Hansson, O. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000006082 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Self-citationPalmqvist, S., Insel, P. S., Stomrud, E., Janelidze, S., Zetterberg, H., Brix, B., Eichenlaub, U., Dage, J. L., Chai, X., Blennow, K., et al. (2019) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201911170 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Self-citationLongitudinal cognitive and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease
McDade, E., Wang, G., Gordon, B. A., Hassenstab, J., Benzinger, T. L. S., Buckles, V., Fagan, A. M., Holtzman, D. M., Cairns, N. J., Goate, A. M., et al. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000006277 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
La Joie, R., Ayakta, N., Seeley, W. W., Borys, E., Boxer, A. L., DeCarli, C., Doré, V., Grinberg, L. T., Huang, E., Hwang, J., et al. (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.001 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Self-citationSobue, A., Komine, O., Hara, Y., Endo, F., Mizoguchi, H., Watanabe, S., Murayama, S., Saito, T., Saido, T. C., Sahara, N., et al. (2021) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-020-01099-x · Cited by 253 · see citing works
The human connectome in Alzheimer disease — relationship to biomarkers and genetics
Yu, M., Sporns, O., & Saykin, A. J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-021-00529-1 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Multiplex proteomics identifies novel CSF and plasma biomarkers of early Alzheimer’s disease
Whelan, C. D., Mattsson, N., Nagle, M. W., Vijayaraghavan, S., Hyde, C., Janelidze, S., Stomrud, E., Lee, J., Fitz, L., Samad, T. A., et al. (2019) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-019-0795-2 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvances in the development of new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease
Klyucherev, T. O., Olszewski, P., Shalimova, A. A., Chubarev, V. N., Tarasov, V. V., Attwood, M. M., Syvänen, S., & Schiöth, H. B. (2022) · Translational Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s40035-022-00296-z · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Prevention of dementia in an ageing world: Evidence and biological rationale
Grande, G., Qiu, C., & Fratiglioni, L. (2020) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2020.101045 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Time course of phosphorylated-tau181 in blood across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum
Moscoso, A., Grothe, M. J., Ashton, N. J., Karikari, T. K., Rodriguez, J. L., Snellman, A., Suárez-Calvet, M., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Schöll, M., et al. (2021) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa399 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantification of amyloid PET for future clinical use: a state-of-the-art review
Pemberton, H. G., Collij, L. E., Heeman, F., Bollack, A., Shekari, M., Salvadó, G., Alves, I. L., Garcia, D. V., Battle, M., Buckley, C., et al. (2022) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-022-05784-y · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau231 as an early indicator of emerging pathology in Alzheimer's disease
Ashton, N. J., Benedet, A. L., Pascoal, T. A., Karikari, T. K., Lantero-Rodriguez, J., Brum, W. S., Mathotaarachchi, S., Therriault, J., Savard, M., Chamoun, M., et al. (2022) · eBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103836 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationCortical tau deposition follows patterns of entorhinal functional connectivity in aging
Adams, J. N., Maass, A., Harrison, T. M., Baker, S. L., & Jagust, W. J. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.49132 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationThe implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease
Mattsson-Carlgren, N., Leuzy, A., Janelidze, S., Palmqvist, S., Stomrud, E., Strandberg, O., Smith, R., & Hansson, O. (2020) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000009485 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationAndersen, J. V., Skotte, N. H., Christensen, S. K., Polli, F. S., Shabani, M., Markussen, K. H., Haukedal, H., Westi, E. W., Diaz-delCastillo, M., Sun, R. C., et al. (2021) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-021-04237-y · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Association of Sleep and β-Amyloid Pathology Among Older Cognitively Unimpaired Adults
Insel, P. S., Mohlenhoff, B. S., Neylan, T. C., Krystal, A. D., & Mackin, R. S. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17573 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Venkataraman, A. V., Mansur, A., Rizzo, G., Bishop, C., Lewis, Y., Kocagoncu, E., Lingford-Hughes, A., Huiban, M., Passchier, J., Rowe, J. B., et al. (2022) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abk1051 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Whitesell, J. D., Buckley, A. R., Knox, J. E., Kuan, L., Graddis, N., Pelos, A., Mukora, A., Wakeman, W., Bohn, P., Ho, A., et al. (2019) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.24555 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Weise, C. M., Chen, K., Chen, Y., Kuang, X., Savage, C. R., & Reiman, E. M. (2018) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.07.016 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
The relevance of cerebrospinal fluid α-synuclein levels to sporadic and familial Alzheimer’s disease
for the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN), Twohig, D., Rodriguez-Vieitez, E., Sando, S. B., Berge, G., Lauridsen, C., Møller, I., Grøntvedt, G. R., Bråthen, G., Patra, K., et al. (2018) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-018-0624-z · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Chhatwal, J. P., Schultz, A. P., Dang, Y., Ostaszewski, B., Liu, L., Yang, H.-S., Johnson, K. A., Sperling, R. A., & Selkoe, D. J. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19543-w · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Palmqvist, S., Insel, P. S., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Brix, B., Stomrud, E., Initiative, T. A. D. N., study, T. S. B., Mattsson, N., & Hansson, O. (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.08.014 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationThe genetic regulation of protein expression in cerebrospinal fluid
Hansson, O., Kumar, A., Janelidze, S., Stomrud, E., Insel, P. S., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Fauman, E., Hedman, Å. K., Nagle, M. W., et al. (2023) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.202216359 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationAssociation of small vessel disease with tau pathology
Kapasi, A., Yu, L., Petyuk, V., Arfanakis, K., Bennett, D. A., & Schneider, J. A. (2022) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-021-02397-x · Cited by 55 · see citing works
White matter hyperintensities are associated with subthreshold amyloid accumulation
Moscoso, A., Rey-Bretal, D., Silva-Rodríguez, J., Aldrey, J. M., Cortés, J., Pías-Peleteiro, J., Ruibal, Á., & Aguiar, P. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116944 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“Recent evidence suggests that ‘ accumulators ’ experience faster rates of cognitive decline (Landau et al., 2018; Farrell et al., 2018) and disrupted brain connectivity (Palmqvist et al., 2017), highlighting the clinical relevance of early amyloid accumulation.”
Eggert, S., Kins, S., Endres, K., & Brigadski, T. (2022) · Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1515/hsz-2021-0330 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
The association between white matter hyperintensities and amyloid and tau deposition
Alban, S. L., Lynch, K. M., Ringman, J. M., Toga, A. W., Chui, H. C., Sepehrband, F., & Choupan, J. (2023) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103383 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Jagust, W. J., Koeppe, R. A., Rabinovici, G. D., Villemagne, V. L., Harrison, T. M., Landau, S. M., & Initiative, T. A. D. N. (2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14165 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationZhukovsky, P., Coughlan, G., Buckley, R., Grady, C., & Voineskos, A. N. (2023) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.26148 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The Effects of Amyloid and Tau on Functional Network Connectivity in Older Populations
Wales, R. M., & Leung, H.-C. (2021) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2020.0902 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Lin, C., Ly, M., Karim, H. T., Wei, W., Snitz, B. E., Klunk, W. E., & Aizenstein, H. J. (2020) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-019-0573-1 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Shafer, A. T., Beason-Held, L., An, Y., Williams, O. A., Huo, Y., Landman, B. A., Caffo, B. S., & Resnick, S. M. (2021) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.03.013 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Pini, L., Brusini, L., Griffa, A., Cruciani, F., Allali, G., Frisoni, G. B., Corbetta, M., Menegaz, G., & Boscolo Galazzo, I. (2025) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2025.106866 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Association of brain network dynamics with plasma biomarkers in subjective memory complainers
Chiesa, P. A., Houot, M., Vergallo, A., Cavedo, E., Lista, S., Potier, M. C., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Vanmechelen, E., De Vos, A., et al. (2020) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.12.017 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationSheng, J., Zhu, H., Zhou, R., Zhang, Q., Wang, J., & Ying, Z. (2025) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149691 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Palmqvist, S., Schöll, M., Strandberg, O., Mattsson, N., Stomrud, E., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Landau, S., Jagust, W., & Hansson, O.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Palmqvist, Sebastian
- Hansson, Oskar
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2017-10-31
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1214-1214
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5663717
- OpenAlex
- W2766125374
- Semantic Scholar
- 84a2ff7390d42efd852e90af928c60af3e767279
- Cited by
- 911
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 107 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 136 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 46.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense (U01 AG024904, W81XWH, W81XWH-12-2-, W81XWH-12, W81XWH1220012, AG024904)
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (W81XWH-12-2-0012, U01AG024904, Grant U01 AG024904, AG024904)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (U01 AG024904, AG024904, W81XWH-12-2-0012)
- Eli Lilly and Company (U01 AG024904, AG024904, W81XWH-12-2-0012)
- Pfizer (AG024904, W81XWH-12-2-0012, U01 AG024904)
- Biogen (W81XWH-12-2-0012, U01 AG024904, AG024904)
- University of Southern California (W81XWH-12-2-0012, U01 AG024904)
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche (W81XWH-12-2-0012, AG024904, U01 AG024904)
- Meso Scale Diagnostics (U01 AG024904, AG024904, W81XWH-12-2-0012)
- Torsten Söderbergs Stiftelse
- BioClinica (U01 AG024904, W81XWH-12-2-0012, AG024904)
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (W81XWH-12-2-0012, U01 AG024904, AG024904)
- Northern California Institute for Research and Education (U01 AG024904, W81XWH-12-2-0012)
- Australian Government
- Marcus Foundation
- Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
- Lunds Universitet
- Eisai (W81XWH-12-2-0012, U01 AG024904, AG024904)
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Skånes universitetssjukhus
- Servier (AG024904, W81XWH-12-2-0012, U01 AG024904)
- Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond
- H. Lundbeck A/S (U01 AG024904, AG024904, W81XWH-12-2-0012)
- IXICO (AG024904, W81XWH-12-2-0012, U01 AG024904)
- National Institutes of Health (3u01ag024904-10s2, W81XWH, W81XWH-12-2-0012, U01-AG024904, Grant U01 AG024904, AG024904)
- Genentech (W81XWH-12-2-0012, AG024904, U01 AG024904)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (U01 AG024904, W81XWH-12-2-0012)
- National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-024904, W81XWH-12-2–0012, AG 024904)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- amyloid-beta deposition, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, default mode network, brain connectivity, precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, amyloid PET, hypoconnectivity, frontoparietal network, brain atrophy, glucose hypometabolism
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Atrophy, Brain, Female, Glucose, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Organ Size, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Amyloid beta-Peptides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review