Cited by 36Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Hospital admissions, outpatient visits and healthcare costs of community‐dwellers with Alzheimer's disease

Tolppanen, Anna‐Maija, Taipale, Heidi, Purmonen, Timo, Koponen, Marjaana, Soininen, Hilkka, Hartikainen, Sirpa·2015·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Background: Detailed data on the health care service use of people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are scarce. Methods: We assessed the health care service use of all community‐dwelling persons with clinically verified AD diagnosis, residing in Finland on December 31, 2005 (n = 27,948) in comparison to matched cohort without AD. Hospitalization data during 2006–2009 were extracted from the National Hospital Discharge Register. Results: Comorbidity‐adjusted incidence rate ratios; IRR (95% CI) were 1.25 (1.22–1.28) for inpatient admissions and 0.72 (0.68–0.77) for outpatient visits. People with AD had more general health care admissions (IRR, 95%CI 1.73, 1.67–1.80) but less admissions to specialty units 0.82 (0.79–0.85) than the non‐AD group, with psychiatry being the only specialty with more admissions in the AD group. People with AD had 16 more hospital days/person‐year. Conclusions: It would be important to assess whether inpatient hospitalizations of AD patients could be decreased by better targeting of outpatient services and whether other conditions are underdiagnosed or undertreated among persons with AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.10.005

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dementia progression influenced the perceived appropriateness of treatments, as changing understanding of risk and benefit to the patient's quality of life was linked to decisions not to treat certain conditions (CMOC3).

    “However, dementia progression influenced the perceived appropriateness of treatments, as changing understanding of risk and benefit to the patient’s quality of life was linked to decisions not to treat certain conditions (CMOC3) [45, 60, 74].”
  • When dementia was diagnosed, limited knowledge often prevented HCPs from effectively planning care or addressing the impact of dementia symptoms on condition management (CMOC9).

    “When dementia was diagnosed, limited knowledge often prevented HCPs from effectively planning care or addressing the impact of dementia symptoms on condition management (CMOC9) [46, 51, 54, 73, 74, 77, 83–85].”
  • Collaboration between healthcare professionals was associated with delayed discharges, emphasising the problem in care co-ordination.

    “As a result, collaboration between HCPs was associated with delayed discharges, emphasising the problem in care co-ordination (CMOC19) [40, 42, 74, 83, 88, 91, 92].”
  • There is a clear lack of appropriate knowledge and training for healthcare professionals on dementia, which had a knock-on effect on discharge planning and patient access to services.

    “Our findings suggest that there is a clear lack of appropriate knowledge and training for HCPs on dementia, which had a knock-on effect on discharge planning and patient access to services [46, 50, 51, 54, 59, 61, 73, 74, 77, 78, 80–86].”
  • Studies have shown twofold differences between hospital use in dementia compared with non-dementia cohorts, including those that addressed differences in population characteristics using propensity score matching.

    “Studies have shown twofold differences between hospital use in dementia compared with non-dementia cohorts,5 11 31 32 including those who have addressed the differences in population characteristics using propensity score matching.3”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tolppanen, A., Taipale, H., Purmonen, T., Koponen, M., Soininen, H., & Hartikainen, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Medfiles (Finland) (FI)
Corresponding author
Tolppanen, Anna‐Maija
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-10
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
955-963
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2045259386
Cited by
36
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Itä-Suomen Yliopisto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Finland, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Residence Characteristics, Cohort Studies, Health Care Costs, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review