Cited by 94Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Detecting agitation and aggression in people with dementia using sensors—A systematic review

Khan, Shehroz S., Ye, Bing, Taati, Babak, Mihailidis, Alex·2018·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Agitation and aggression are among the most challenging symptoms of dementia. Agitated persons with dementia can harm themselves, their caregivers, or other patients in a care facility. Automatic detection of agitation would be useful to alert caregivers so that appropriate interventions can be performed. The building blocks in the automatic detection of agitation and aggression are appropriate sensing platforms and generalized predictive models. In this article, we perform a systematic review of studies that use different types of sensors to detect agitation and aggression in persons with dementia. We conclude that actigraphy shows some evidence of correlation with incidences of agitation and aggression; however, multimodal sensing has not been fully evaluated for this purpose. Based on this systematic review, we provide guidelines and recommendations for future research directions in this field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review of 14 studies of sensing technologies for dementia symptoms showed that, in 7 studies, actigraphy correlated with agitation and aggression in people with dementia, but there was a lack of evidence for other technologies.

    “A review of 14 studies of sensing technologies for dementia symptoms showed that, in 7 studies, actigraphy correlated with agitation and aggression in people with dementia, but there was a lack of evidence for other technologies .(559)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, S. S., Ye, B., Taati, B., & Mihailidis, A.
Affiliations
University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Khan, Shehroz S.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-20
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
824-832
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2792649255
Cited by
94
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University Health Network
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
dementia, agitation
MeSH terms
Aggression, Dementia, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Psychomotor Agitation, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review