The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mortality prediction of head abbreviated injury score and Glasgow Coma Scale: analysis of 7,764 head injuries1
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We assessed the prognostic value and limitations of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and head Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) and correlated head AIS with GCS. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 7,764 patients with head injuries. Bivariate analysis was performed to examine the relationship of GCS, head AIS, age, gender, and mechanism of injury with mortality. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: The overall mortality in the group of head injury patients with no other major extracranial injuries and no hypotension on admission was 9.3%. Logistic regression analysis identified head AIS, GCS, age, and mechanism of injury as significant independent risk factors of death. The prognostic value of GCS and head AIS was significantly affected by the mechanism of injury and the age of the patient. Patients with similar GCS or head AIS but different mechanisms of injury or ages had significantly different outcomes. The adjusted odds ratio of death in penetrating trauma was 5.2 (3.9, 7.0), p < 0.0001, and in the age group > or = 55 years the adjusted odds ratio was 3.4 (2.6, 4.6), p < 0.0001. There was no correlation between head AIS and GCS (correlation coefficient -0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Mechanism of injury and age have a major effect in the predictive value of GCS and head AIS. There is no good correlation between GCS and head AIS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coagulopathy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Study
Talving, P., Benfield, R., Hadjizacharia, P., Inaba, K., Chan, L. S., & Demetriades, D. (2009) · Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care · doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e318190c3c0 · Cited by 276
Self-citation150 Years of Treating Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Progress in Mortality
Stein, S. C., Georgoff, P., Meghan, S., Mizra, K., & Sonnad, S. S. (2010) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1206 · Cited by 255
A porcine model of traumatic brain injury via head rotational acceleration
Cullen, D. K., Harris, J. P., Browne, K. D., Wolf, J. A., Duda, J. E., Meaney, D. F., Margulies, S. S., & Smith, D. H. (2016) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3816-2_17 · Cited by 142
“However, approximately 90 % of clinical TBIs are classified as mild, which by definition are closed-head injuries and not typically associated with bleeds or contusions, although there is debate in this area [53, 54].”
Acute Diabetes Insipidus in Severe Head Injury: A Prospective Study
Hadjizacharia, P., Beale, E. O., Inaba, K., Chan, L. S., & Demetriades, D. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.017 · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Demetriades, D., Kuncir, E., Murray, J., Velmahos, G. C., Rhee, P., & Chan, L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 199
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 216-222
- ISSN
- 1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054258745
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality prediction of head abbreviated injury score and Glasgow Coma Scale: analysis of 7,764 head injuries1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.02.030
- The paper
- Demetriades, D., Kuncir, E., Murray, J., Velmahos, G. C., Rhee, P., & Chan, L. (2004). Mortality prediction of head abbreviated injury score and Glasgow Coma Scale: analysis of 7,764 head injuries1. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.02.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.