Cited by 142Automotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

A porcine model of traumatic brain injury via head rotational acceleration

Open access
Cullen, D. Kacy, Harris, James P., Browne, Kevin D., Wolf, John A., Duda, John E., Meaney, David F., Margulies, Susan S., Smith, Douglas H.·2016·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

Unique from other brain disorders, traumatic brain injury (TBI) generally results from a discrete biomechanical event that induces rapid head movement. The large size and high organization of the human brain makes it particularly vulnerable to traumatic injury from rotational accelerations that can cause dynamic deformation of the brain tissue. Therefore, replicating the injury biomechanics of human TBI in animal models presents a substantial challenge, particularly with regard to addressing brain size and injury parameters. Here we present the historical development and use of a porcine model of head rotational acceleration. By scaling up the rotational forces to account for difference in brain mass between swine and humans, this model has been shown to produce the same tissue deformations and identical neuropathologies found in human TBI. The parameters of scaled rapid angular accelerations applied for the model reproduce inertial forces generated when the human head suddenly accelerates or decelerates in falls, collisions, or blunt impacts. The model uses custom-built linkage assemblies and a powerful linear actuator designed to produce purely impulsive non-impact head rotation in different angular planes at controlled rotational acceleration levels. Through a range of head rotational kinematics, this model can produce functional and neuropathological changes across the spectrum from concussion to severe TBI. Notably, however, the model is very difficult to employ, requiring a highly skilled team for medical management, biomechanics, neurological recovery, and specialized outcome measures including neuromonitoring, neurophysiology, neuroimaging, and neuropathology. Nonetheless, while challenging, this clinically relevant model has proven valuable for identifying mechanisms of acute and progressive neuropathologies as well as for the evaluation of noninvasive diagnostic techniques and potential neuroprotective treatments following TBI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4939-3816-2_17

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The complex neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of the human brain, such as cortical folding, substantial white matter, and specific pathophysiology compared to the rodent brain, may facilitate distinct post-injury neuropathology.

    “Indeed, the complex neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of the human brain, such as cortical folding, substantial white matter, and specific pathophysiology compared to the rodent brain, may facilitate distinct post-injury neuropathology (137).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

24 of the 166 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [6]Thurman DJ Alverson C Dunn KA Guerrero J Sniezek JE 1999 Traumatic brain injury in the United States: a public health perspective J Head Trauma Rehabil 14 602 615 10671706
  2. [7]Graham R Rivara FP Ford MA Spicer CM 2014 Sports-related concussions in youth: improving the science, changing the culture The National Academies Press Washington, DC 24199265
  3. [10]Prevention, C. f. D. C. a 2011 Nonfatal traumatic brain injuries related to sports and recreation activities among persons aged ≤19 Years—United States, 2001-2009 MMWR 60 1337 1342 21976115
  4. [12]Hoge CW McGurk D Thomas JL Cox AL Engel CC Castro CA 2008 Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. Soldiers returning from Iraq N Engl J Med 358 453 463 18234750
  5. [21]McIntosh TK Smith DH Meaney DF Kotapka MJ Gennarelli TA Graham DI 1996 Neuropathological sequelae of traumatic brain injury: relationship to neuro-chemical and biomechanical mechanisms Lab Invest 74 315 342 8780153
  6. [23]Gennarelli TA 1993 Mechanisms of brain injury J Emerg Med 11 Suppl 1 5 11 8445204
  7. [25]McIntosh TK Juhler M Raghupathi R Saatman KE Smith DH 1999 Secondary brain injury: neurochemical and cellular mediators Marion W Traumatic brain injury Thieme Medical Publishers New York, NY 39 54
  8. [37]Mouzon B Bachmeier C Ferro A Ojo JO Crynen G Acker C Davies P Mullan M Stewart W Crawford F 2013 Chronic neuropathological and neurobehavioral changes in a repetitive mTBI model Ann Neurol 75 2 241 254 24243523
  9. [38]McKee AC Cantu RC Nowinski CJ Hedley-Whyte ET Gavett BE Budson AE Santini VE Lee HS Kubilus CA Stern RA 2009 Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: progressive tauopathy after repetitive head injury J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 68 709 735 19535999 PMC2945234
  10. [39]McIntosh TK 1994 Neurochemical sequelae of traumatic brain injury: therapeutic implications Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 6 109 162 7915532
  11. [42]Ryan LM Warden DL 2003 Post concussion syndrome Int Rev Psychiatry 15 310 316 15276952
  12. [58]Yarnell P Ommaya AK 1969 Experimental cerebral concussion in the rhesus monkey Bull N Y Acad Med 45 39 45 4977441 PMC1750322
  13. [61]Gennarelli TA Thibault LE Ommaya AK 1971 Comparison of linear and rotational acceleration in experimental cerebral concussion Proceedings of the 15th Stapp car crash conference New York society of automotive engineers 797 803
  14. [81]Kleiven S 2013 Why most traumatic brain injuries are not caused by linear acceleration but skull fractures are Front Bioeng Biotechnol 1 15 25022321 PMC4090913
  15. [89]Graham DI Adams JH Gennarelli TA 1988 Mechanisms of non-penetrating head injury Prog Clin Biol Res 234 159 168 3289020
  16. [125]Thibault LE Gennarelli TA 1989 Biomechanics of diffuse brain injuries Proceedings of the 10th international technical conference on experimental safety vehicles DOT, NHTSA
  17. [134]Wolf JA Johnson BN Johnson VE Browne KD Mietus CJ Smith DH Grady MS Cohen A Cullen DK in review Concussion induces hippocampal circuitry disruption in swine PMC5510797 28298170
  18. [138]McGowan JC McCormack TM Grossman RI Mendonca R Chen XH Berlin JA Meaney DF Xu BN Cecil KM McIntosh TK Smith DH 1999 Diffuse axonal pathology detected with magnetization transfer imaging following brain injury in the pig Magn Reson Med 41 727 733 10332848
  19. [147]Wolf JA Ulyanova AV Browne KD Koch P Grovola MR Johnson VE Cullen DK 2014 Hippocampal network disruptions after diffuse brain injury in swine Winter conference on brain research

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cullen, D. K., Harris, J. P., Browne, K. D., Wolf, J. A., Duda, J. E., Meaney, D. F., Margulies, S. S., & Smith, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Cullen, D. Kacy
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Published
2016
Volume
1462
Pages
289-324
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W2514627507
Cited by
142
References
166
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8
FWCI
72.55
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK2 RX001479, I01-RX001097)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS038104, R01NS092398, R01NS088176, R01NS050598, R01NS101108, T32NS043126)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB021293)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, porcine model, angular acceleration, head rotation, brain deformation, injury biomechanics, concussion, linear actuator, neuropathology
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Biopsy, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Rotation, Swine, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review