Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnosis and Contemporary Management of Anastomotic Leaks after Gastric Bypass for Obesity

Gonzalez, Rodrigo, Sarr, Michael G., Smith, Daniel C., Baghai, Mercedeh, Kendrick, Michael, Szomstein, Samuel, Rosenthal, Raul, Murr, Michel M.·2007·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leaks are a dreaded complication of bariatric surgery. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of treatment in patients who develop anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity. STUDY DESIGN: Prospectively collected data on 3,018 consecutive patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in 4 tertiary referral centers were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (2.1%) developed anastomotic leaks (open, 2.1%; laparoscopic, 2.1%) at a median of 3 days (range 0 to 28 days) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Symptoms and signs included tachycardia (72%), fever (63%), or abdominal pain (54%). Upper gastrointestinal series and CT demonstrated leaks in only 17 of 56 (30%) and 28 of 50 (56%) patients, respectively; when done jointly, both studies were negative in 30% of patients. The 68 anastomotic leaks occurred at the gastrojejunostomy (49%), excluded stomach (25%), jejunojejunostomy (13%), gastric pouch (9%), and uncertain location (4%). Forty patients (63%) required 58 reoperations for drainage of intraabdominal collections (55%), repair of anastomotic defects (34%), or revision of the leaking anastomosis (11%), with an overall morbidity of 53% and mortality of 10%. Nonoperative treatment was successful in 23 of 26 patients, with an overall morbidity of 61% and no mortality (p=NS versus operative). Operative treatment was more common in patients with hypotension or oliguria (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of specificity in clinical presentation and imaging studies make diagnosing anastomotic leaks challenging, so operative exploration should be part of the diagnostic algorithm. Nonoperative treatment is safe and effective in a subset of patients who exhibit stable hemodynamic parameters and are known to have controlled leaks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.09.023

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Gonzalez, R., Sarr, M. G., Smith, D. C., Baghai, M., Kendrick, M., Szomstein, S., Rosenthal, R., & Murr, M. M.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2007-01
Volume
204
Issue
1
Pages
47-55
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132464299
Cited by
304
References
14
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis and Contemporary Management of Anastomotic Leaks after Gastric Bypass for Obesity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.09.023
The paper
Gonzalez, R., Sarr, M. G., Smith, D. C., Baghai, M., Kendrick, M., Szomstein, S., Rosenthal, R., & Murr, M. M. (2007). Diagnosis and Contemporary Management of Anastomotic Leaks after Gastric Bypass for Obesity. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.09.023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.