The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Leak Complications
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: Enteric leakage is a significant complication of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure that can be treated successfully. DESIGN: Retrospective study of 400 consecutive RYGB patients from 1999-2002. SETTING: Community hospital with a university surgical residency. PATIENTS: Hospital records of 400 morbidly obese patients who underwent gastric bypass surgery were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time of discovery of leak, location of leak, treatment, hospital stay, and mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (5.25%) developed leaks. The mean body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) was 54.2. Thirteen patients were noted to develop a leak at the gastrojejunal anastomosis, with an average time to diagnosis of 7.0 days. Five of these patients underwent reexploration, and 8 were successfully treated with percutaneous drainage alone. Four patients developed leaks at the jejunojejunal anastomosis (mean time to diagnosis, 2.0 days). All of these patients required exploration, and 2 patients died. Four patients were noted to have leaks in other areas (average time to diagnosis, 3.5 days). Two patients were treated with drainage, and 2 underwent exploration. The average hospital stay of all patients was 33 days. CONCLUSIONS: Enteric leakage is a significant complication of the RYGB. Patients who are suspected of having an enteric leak because of signs of sepsis or hemodynamic instability require emergent exploration. Leaks that are more insidious may be treated successfully with percutaneous drainage. Aggressive exploration of patients who appear to be septic, and percutaneous drainage of insidiously developing leaks may decrease patients' morbidity and mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity
Panel, C. D. C. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-115-12-956 · Cited by 2,163
Cited by
Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery
Brethauer, S. A., Kothari, S., Sudan, R., Williams, B., English, W. J., Brengman, M., Kurian, M., Hutter, M., Stegemann, L., Kallies, K., et al. (2014) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.014 · Cited by 392
Mechanick, J. I., Kushner, R. F., Sugerman, H. J., Gonzalez‐Campoy, J. M., Collazo‐Clavell, M. L., Spitz, A. F., Apovian, C. M., Livingston, E. H., Brolin, R., Sarwer, D. B., et al. (2009) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2009.28 · Cited by 345
Complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Lalor, P. F., Tucker, O. N., Szomstein, S., & Rosenthal, R. J. (2008) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2007.08.015 · Cited by 323
Diagnosis and Contemporary Management of Anastomotic Leaks after Gastric Bypass for Obesity
Gonzalez, R., Sarr, M. G., Smith, D. C., Baghai, M., Kendrick, M., Szomstein, S., Rosenthal, R., & Murr, M. M. (2007) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.09.023 · Cited by 304
One Thousand Consecutive Mini-Gastric Bypass: Short- and Long-term Outcome
Noun, R., Skaff, J., Riachi, E., Daher, R., Antoun, N. A., & Nasr, M. (2012) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-012-0618-z · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Marshall, J. S.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-05-01
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 520
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132271654
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Leak Complications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.138.5.520
- The paper
- Marshall, J. S. (2003). Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Leak Complications. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.5.520
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.