The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining Morbidity after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Use of a Prospective Complication Grading System
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improving surgical quality of care requires accurate reporting of postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: Accuracy of a prospective surgical complication grading database was assessed by performing a retrospective review of 204 pancreaticoduodenectomies (PDs) entered into the database from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2003. This updated database was then used to characterize 30-day morbidity and mortality after PD. RESULTS: On review, 13% of patients had a complication not identified in the prospective complication database, 8% of patients had a complication reclassified, and 4% of patients had a complication removed. At least 1 postoperative complication was experienced by 47% of patients. After PD, 45 different complications occurred. Postoperative mortality at 30 days was 1%, and 30-day readmission rate was 11%. The 30-day reoperation rate was 9%, and 14% of patients required a percutaneous drainage procedure. Pancreatic anastomotic leak (12%), wound infection (11%), and delayed gastric emptying (7%) were the 3 most common postoperative complications, and all were associated with an increased length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Our prospective surgical complication database accurately characterized outcomes after PD and facilitated information gathering and analysis. The accuracy, efficiency, and reproducibility of a prospective surgical complication database favor its widespread use in postoperative complication reporting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quality of data in the Manchester orthopaedic database.
Barrie, J. L., & Marsh, D. R. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6820.159 · Cited by 74
Cited by
Pasireotide for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula
Allen, P. J., Gönen, M., Brennan, M. F., Bucknor, A. A., Robinson, L. M., Pappas, M. M., Carlucci, K. E., D'Angelica, M. I., DeMatteo, R. P., Kingham, T. P., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1313688 · Cited by 438
Self-citationWinter, J. M., Brennan, M. F., Tang, L. H., D’Angelica, M. I., DeMatteo, R. P., Fong, Y., Klimstra, D. S., Jarnagin, W. R., & Allen, P. J. (2012) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1900-3 · Cited by 340
Self-citationHouse, M. G., Fong, Y., Arnaoutakis, D. J., Sharma, R., Winston, C. B., Protic, M., Gonen, M., Olson, S. H., Kurtz, R. C., Brennan, M. F., et al. (2008) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11605-007-0421-7 · Cited by 273
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Grobmyer, S. R., Pieracci, F. M., Allen, P. J., Brennan, M. F., & Jaques, D. P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 204
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 356-364
- ISSN
- 1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963678138
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining Morbidity after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Use of a Prospective Complication Grading System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.11.017
- The paper
- Grobmyer, S. R., Pieracci, F. M., Allen, P. J., Brennan, M. F., & Jaques, D. P. (2007). Defining Morbidity after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Use of a Prospective Complication Grading System. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.11.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.