Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 438

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pasireotide for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula

Open access
Allen, Peter J., Gönen, Mithat, Brennan, Murray F., Bucknor, Adjoa A., Robinson, Lindsay M., Pappas, Marisa M., Carlucci, Kate E., D'Angelica, Michael I., DeMatteo, Ronald P., Kingham, T. Peter, Fong, Yuman, Jarnagin, William R.·2014·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a major contributor to complications and death associated with pancreatic resection. Pasireotide, a somatostatin analogue that has a longer half-life than octreotide and a broader binding profile, decreases pancreatic exocrine secretions and may prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, randomized, double-blind trial of perioperative subcutaneous pasireotide in patients undergoing either pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. We randomly assigned 300 patients to receive 900 μg of subcutaneous pasireotide (152 patients) or placebo (148 patients) twice daily beginning preoperatively on the morning of the operation and continuing for 7 days (14 doses). Randomization was stratified according to the type of resection and whether the pancreatic duct was dilated at the site of transection. The primary end point was the development of pancreatic fistula, leak, or abscess of grade 3 or higher (i.e., requiring drainage). RESULTS: The primary end point occurred in 45 of the 300 patients (15%). The rate of grade 3 or higher postoperative pancreatic fistula, leak, or abscess was significantly lower among patients who received pasireotide than among patients who received placebo (9% vs. 21%; relative risk, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.78; P=0.006). This finding was consistent among 220 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (10% vs. 21%; relative risk, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.95) and 80 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy (7% vs. 23%; relative risk, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.99), as well as among 136 patients with a dilated pancreatic duct (2% vs. 15%; relative risk, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.60) and 164 patients with a nondilated pancreatic duct (15% vs. 27%; relative risk, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative treatment with pasireotide decreased the rate of clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula, leak, or abscess. (Funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00994110.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1313688

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 438

Metadata

Authors
Allen, P. J., Gönen, M., Brennan, M. F., Bucknor, A. A., Robinson, L. M., Pappas, M. M., Carlucci, K. E., D'Angelica, M. I., DeMatteo, R. P., Kingham, T. P., Fong, Y., & Jarnagin, W. R.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2014-05-22
Volume
370
Issue
21
Pages
2014-2022
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2153893536
Cited by
438
References
13
FWCI
20.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pasireotide for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1313688
The paper
Allen, P. J., Gönen, M., Brennan, M. F., Bucknor, A. A., Robinson, L. M., Pappas, M. M., Carlucci, K. E., D'Angelica, M. I., DeMatteo, R. P., Kingham, T. P., Fong, Y., & Jarnagin, W. R. (2014). Pasireotide for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1313688

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.