The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Colorectal Anastomosis with a Double Stapling Technique
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic rectal transection carries the risk of anastomotic leakage because of its technical difficulty and long staple line with an inadequate cutting angle. Our objective was to investigate the risk factors affecting anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique. STUDY DESIGN: Between November 2006 and September 2008, 270 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and anterior resection with double stapling technique for distal sigmoid and rectal cancer. Data were collected prospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Additionally, we evaluated the relationship between the number of stapler firings and clinical parameters. RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage was noted in 17 (6.3%) of 270 patients. In univariate analyses, tumor location (p = 0.021), operation time (p = 0.025), number of stapler firings (p = 0.040), and diameter of the circular stapler (p = 0.022) were significant risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Multivariate analyses showed that middle or lower rectal cancer was an independent factor affecting anastomotic leakage (p = 0.013). The number of stapler firings increased significantly in men (p = 0.023), in patients with a tumor at a lower level (p = 0.034), and in those with longer operation times (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in the number of linear stapler firings is necessary to avoid anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique. We recommend that a diverting ileostomy is mandatory in patients with middle and lower rectal cancer where multiple linear staplers were used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
de Lacy, A. M., Rattner, D. W., Adelsdorfer, C., Tasende, M. M., Fernández, M., Delgado, S., Sylla, P., & Martínez-Palli, G. (2013) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2872-0 · Cited by 301
Pommergaard, H. ‐., Gessler, B., Burcharth, J., Angenete, E., Haglind, E., & Rosenberg, J. (2014) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.12618 · Cited by 253
Silva-Velazco, J., Stocchi, L., Costedio, M., Gorgun, E., Kessler, H., & Remzi, F. H. (2016) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4651-6 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J. S., Cho, S. Y., Min, B. S., & Kim, N. K.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 209
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 694-701
- ISSN
- 1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072405560
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Colorectal Anastomosis with a Double Stapling Technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.021
- The paper
- Kim, J. S., Cho, S. Y., Min, B. S., & Kim, N. K. (2009). Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Colorectal Anastomosis with a Double Stapling Technique. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.