The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Abstract
Aim: Colorectal anastomotic leakage is a serious complication. Despite extensive research, no consensus on the most important preoperative risk factors exists. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to evaluate risk factors for anastomotic leakage in patients operated with colorectal resection. Method: The databases MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched for prospective observational studies on preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Meta‐analyses were performed on outcomes based on odds ratios (OR) from multivariate regression analyses. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used for bias assessment within studies, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used for quality assessment of evidence on outcome levels. Results: This review included 23 studies evaluating 110 272 patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. The meta‐analyses found that a low rectal anastomosis [OR = 3.26 (95% CI: 2.31–4.62)], male gender [OR = 1.48 (95% CI: 1.37–1.60)] and preoperative radiotherapy [OR = 1.65 (95% CI: 1.06–2.56)] may be risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Primarily as a result of observational design, the quality of evidence was regarded as moderate or low for these risk factors according to the GRADE approach. Conclusion: Based on the best available evidence, important preoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage have been identified. Knowledge on risk factors may influence treatment and procedure‐related decisions, and possibly reduce the leakage rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
Balshem, H., Helfand, M., Schünemann, H. J., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Vist, G. E., Falck-Ytter, Y., Meerpohl, J., & Norris, S. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015 · Cited by 8,285
Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68 · Cited by 2,045
Rahbari, N. N., Weitz, J., Hohenberger, W., Heald, R. J., Moran, B., Ulrich, A., Holm, T., Wong, W. D., Tiret, E., Moriya, Y., et al. (2010) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012 · Cited by 1,559
Mirnezami, A., Mirnezami, R., Chandrakumaran, K., Sasapu, K., Sagar, P., & Finan, P. (2011) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3182128929 · Cited by 875
Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer
Peeters, K. C. M. J., Tollenaar, R. A. E. M., Marijnen, C. A. M., Klein Kranenbarg, E., Steup, W. H., Wiggers, T., Rutten, H. J., & van de Velde, C. J. H. (2005) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4806 · Cited by 659
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
Kang, C. Y., Halabi, W. J., Chaudhry, O. O., Nguyen, V., Pigazzi, A., Carmichael, J. C., Mills, S., & Stamos, M. J. (2013) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/2013.jamasurg.2 · Cited by 422
Eriksen, M. T., Wibe, A., Norstein, J., Haffner, J., Wiig, J. N., & the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2005) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00700.x · Cited by 351
Cited by
Ischemic and injured bowel evaluation by Fluorescence imaging
Nowak, K., Sandra‐Petrescu, F., Post, S., & Horisberger, K. (2015) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.13032 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Pommergaard, H. ‐., Gessler, B., Burcharth, J., Angenete, E., Haglind, E., & Rosenberg, J.
- Venue
- Colorectal Disease
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08-13
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 662-671
- ISSN
- 1462-8910 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-1318
- OpenAlex
- W1967037538
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/codi.12618
- The paper
- Pommergaard, H. ‐., Gessler, B., Burcharth, J., Angenete, E., Haglind, E., & Rosenberg, J. (2014). Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Colorectal Disease. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12618
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.