The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nationwide Prospective Study of Outcomes after Elective Incisional Hernia Repair
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“With a long-term median follow-up of 48 months, Helgstrand et al. observed an 18.3% overall hernia recurrence rate and 9.5% reoperation rate comparable to the current study (17.9% and 11.6%, respectively).”
From Prospective, multicenter study of P4HB (Phasix™) mesh for hernia repair in cohort at risk for complications: 3-Year follow-up (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“A 21% recurrence rate was reported for open repairs, which is greater than the current study.”
From Prospective, multicenter study of P4HB (Phasix™) mesh for hernia repair in cohort at risk for complications: 3-Year follow-up (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Onlay repairs had a hazard ratio of 1.7, consistent with the current study.”
From Prospective, multicenter study of P4HB (Phasix™) mesh for hernia repair in cohort at risk for complications: 3-Year follow-up (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“With a long-term median follow-up of 48 months, Helgstrand et al. observed an 18.3% overall hernia recurrence rate and 9.5% reoperation rate comparable to the current study (17.9% and 11.6%, respectively).”
From Prospective, multicenter study of P4HB (Phasix™) mesh for hernia repair in cohort at risk for complications: 3-Year follow-up (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“These findings are in agreement with the published literature which has reported 30-day readmission rates of ∼5%–13% in similar cohorts (23–27).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression
Bursac, Z., Gauss, C. H., Williams, D. K., & Hosmer, D. W. (2008) · Source Code for Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1186/1751-0473-3-17 · Cited by 4,035
Cited by
Roth, J. S., Anthone, G. J., Selzer, D. J., Poulose, B. K., Pierce, R. A., Bittner, J. G., Hope, W. W., Dunn, R. M., Martindale, R. G., Goldblatt, M. I., et al. (2021) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.002 · Cited by 40
CT findings of complications after abdominal wall repair with prosthetic mesh
Lacour, M., Ridereau Zins, C., Casa, C., Venara, A., Cartier, V., Yahya, S., Barbieux, J., & Aubé, C. (2017) · Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.diii.2017.01.002 · Cited by 30
Geletzke, A. K., Rinaldi, J. M., Phillips, B. E., Mobley, S. B., Miller, J., Dykes, T., Hollenbeak, C., Kelleher, S. L., & Soybel, D. I. (2014) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11605-013-2431-y · Cited by 14
Deeken, C. R., Rosen, M. J., Poulose, B. K., Bradbury, K., Huang, L.-C., Ma, J., & Badhwar, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Surgery · doi:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1280991 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Helgstrand, F., Rosenberg, J., Kehlet, H., Jorgensen, L. N., & Bisgaard, T.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 216
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-228
- ISSN
- 1072-7515
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
