Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validating Trauma-Specific Frailty Index for Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Prospective Analysis

Joseph, Bellal, Pandit, Viraj, Zangbar, Bardiya, Kulvatunyou, Narong, Tang, Andrew, O'Keeffe, Terence, Green, Donald J., Vercruysse, Gary, Fain, Mindy J., Friese, Randall S., Rhee, Peter·2014·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Frailty Index has been shown to predict discharge disposition in geriatric patients. The aim of this study was to validate the modified 15-variable Trauma-Specific Frailty Index (TSFI) to predict discharge disposition in geriatric trauma patients. We hypothesized that TSFI can predict discharge disposition in geriatric trauma patients. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a 2-year (2011-2013) prospective analysis of all geriatric trauma patients presenting to our Level I trauma center. Patient discharge disposition was dichotomized into unfavorable (discharge to skilled nursing facility or death) and favorable (discharge to home or rehabilitation center) discharge disposition. Patients were evaluated using the developed 15-variable TSFI. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors that predict unfavorable discharge disposition. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were enrolled for validation of TSFI. Mean age was 77 ± 12.1 years, median Injury Severity Score was 15 (interquartile range [IQR] 9 to 20), median Glasgow Coma Scale score was 14 (IQR 13 to 15), and median Frailty Index score was 0.20 (IQR 0.17 to 0.28); 29.5% (n = 59) patients had unfavorable discharge. After adjusting for age, sex, Injury Severity Score, Head Abbreviated Injury Scale, and vitals on admission, Frailty Index (odds ratio = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5) was the only significant predictor for unfavorable discharge disposition. Age (odds ratio = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9-3.1; p = 0.2) was not predictive of unfavorable discharge disposition. CONCLUSIONS: The 15-variable TSFI is an independent predictor of unfavorable discharge disposition in geriatric trauma patients. The Trauma-Specific Frailty Index is an effective tool that can aid clinicians in planning discharge disposition of geriatric trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II Prognostic Studies-Investigating the Effect of a Patient Characteristic on the Outcome of Disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.020

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Joseph, B., Pandit, V., Zangbar, B., Kulvatunyou, N., Tang, A., O'Keeffe, T., Green, D. J., Vercruysse, G., Fain, M. J., Friese, R. S., & Rhee, P.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2014-07
Volume
219
Issue
1
Pages
10-17e1
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087391363
Cited by
285
References
6
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validating Trauma-Specific Frailty Index for Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Prospective Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.020
The paper
Joseph, B., Pandit, V., Zangbar, B., Kulvatunyou, N., Tang, A., O'Keeffe, T., Green, D. J., Vercruysse, G., Fain, M. J., Friese, R. S., & Rhee, P. (2014). Validating Trauma-Specific Frailty Index for Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Prospective Analysis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.