Cited by 88Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPelvic floor disorders treatmentsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Constipation in Long-Term Care

Tariq, Syed H.·2007·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

Constipation is more common in older adults and accounts for increased physician office visits and hospital admissions. There is lack of agreement on the definition of constipation regarding what patients perceive as constipation and what physicians traditionally see as constipation. Constipation is related to multiple factors, and when left untreated or not properly treated, results in complications, such as impaction, even perforation and death. Laxative use increases with age and at times multiple agents are used to relieve symptoms of constipation. Currently the most commonly used laxative is stool softener but it lacks efficacy. From the review of literature, osmotic laxatives are effective in older adults and well tolerated. Psyllium, a bulk laxative, is also effective in the treatment of constipation, while there is limited evidence for stimulants, dioctyl sulfosuccinate, and other bulk laxatives such as calcium polycarbophil and methylcellulose. A new drug, lubiprostone, is a type 2-chloride channel activator and is shown to be effective, safe, and well tolerated in older adults treated for chronic constipation in studies up to a year. It appears to be particularly useful in persons who have recurrent fecal impaction and in those with severe chronic constipation. There is a need for a large-scale trial examining an appropriate cost-effective approach to the management of constipation in the nursing home.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.02.009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tariq, S. H.
Affiliations
Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Tariq, Syed H.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
209-218
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170959427
Cited by
88
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
constipation, long-term care, nursing homes, older adults, chronic constipation, laxatives, osmotic laxatives, bulk laxatives, stool softeners, fecal impaction, lubiprostone, chloride channel activator, psyllium, methylcellulose, dioctyl sulfosuccinate, constipation treatment
MeSH terms
Aged, Algorithms, Cathartics, Chronic Disease, Constipation, Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive System, Humans, Long-Term Care, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review