Cited by 43Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

The Prevalence and Persistence of Sliding Scale Insulin Use Among Newly Admitted Elderly Nursing Home Residents With Diabetes Mellitus

PANDYA, N, THOMPSON, S, SAMBAMOORTHI, U·2008·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the initiation and persistence of sliding scale insulin (SSI) therapy in elderly nursing home (NH) residents.Design and participants A longitudinal study of NH residents (N = 9804) with diabetes aged 65 years and older who were admitted between 2002 and 2003 and resided for 1 month or longer in long-term care facilities associated with a for-profit nursing home chain.Results Rates of SSI use were high among patients who were started on insulin during their stay in nursing homes (54%), and 22% of the total number of orders for insulin were for SSI. After insulin initiation, 83% of residents who were started on SSI remained on it by the end of the study. Of those who had not started on SSI, 33% were later switched to SSI.Discussion This study demonstrated that SSI regimens were highly prevalent and, once initiated, tended to be continued in the treatment of elderly patients with diabetes newly admitted to nursing homes. Multiple factors were found to be significantly associated with initiation and persistence of SSI.Conclusion The high prevalence and persistent use of SSI is inconsistent with the American Medical Directors Association guideline as well as current recommendations. Additional studies are needed to evaluate outcomes associated with prolonged SSI use in long-term care facilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.06.003

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study showed that 83% of residents started on SSI were still treated by SSI alone 6 months later.

    “One study showed that 83% of residents started on SSI were still treated by SSI alone 6 months later129.”

    From Diabetes in Older Adults: A Consensus Report (2012) · cites this paper as [129]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PANDYA, N., THOMPSON, S., & SAMBAMOORTHI, U.
Affiliations
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
  • Sanofi (United States) (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
PANDYA, N
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
663-669
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114545570
Cited by
43
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
sliding scale insulin, diabetes mellitus, nursing home residents, elderly patients, insulin initiation, long-term care, nursing home admission, for-profit nursing homes
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Nursing Homes, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review