Cited by 55Medical Practices and RehabilitationStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Enhanced Medical Rehabilitation Increases Therapy Intensity and Engagement and Improves Functional Outcomes in Postacute Rehabilitation of Older Adults: A Randomized-Controlled Trial

Open access
Lenze, Eric J., Host, Helen H., Hildebrand, Mary W., Morrow-Howell, Nancy, Carpenter, Brian, Freedland, Kenneth E., Baum, Carolyn A., Dixon, David +3 more·2012·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

Objectives For millions of disabled older adults each year, postacute care in skilled nursing facilities is a brief window of opportunity to regain enough function to return home and live independently. Too often this goal is not achieved, possibly because of therapy that is inadequately intense or engaging. This study tested Enhanced Medical Rehabilitation, an intervention designed to increase patient engagement in, and intensity of, daily physical and occupational therapy sessions in postacute-care rehabilitation.Design Randomized controlled trial of Enhanced Medical Rehabilitation versus standard-of-care rehabilitation.Setting Postacute care unit of a skilled nursing facility in St Louis, MO.Participants Twenty-six older adults admitted from a hospital for postacute rehabilitation.Intervention Based on models of motivation and behavior change, Enhanced Medical Rehabilitation is a set of behavioral skills for physical and occupational therapists that increase patient engagement and intensity, with the goal of improving functional outcome, through (1) a patient-directed, interactive approach, (2) increased rehabilitation intensity, and (3) frequent feedback to patients on their effort and progress.Measurements Therapy intensity: assessment of patient active time in therapy sessions. Therapy engagement: Rehabilitation Participation Scale. Functional and performance outcomes: Barthel Index, gait speed, and 6-minute walk.Results Participants randomized to Enhanced Medical Rehabilitation had higher intensity therapy and were more engaged in their rehabilitation sessions; they had more improvement in gait speed (improving from 0.08 to 0.38 m/s versus 0.08 to 0.22 in standard of care, P = .003) and 6-minute walk (from 73 to 266 feet versus 40 to 94 feet in standard of care, P = .026), with a trend for better improvement of Barthel Index (+43 points versus 26 points in standard of care, P = .087), compared with participants randomized to standard-of-care rehabilitation.Conclusion Higher intensity and patient engagement in the postacute rehabilitation setting is achievable, with resultant better functional outcomes for older adults. Findings should be confirmed in a larger randomized controlled trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.06.014

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Hildebrand M Host HH Kraus L Lenze E Binder EF Novel methods for increasing and measuring occupational therapy intensity in the skilled nursing rehabilitation setting 2012 Poster presentation at the 2012 AOTA National Conference in Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lenze, E. J., Host, H. H., Hildebrand, M. W., Morrow-Howell, N., Carpenter, B., Freedland, K. E., Baum, C. A., Dixon, D., Doré, P., Wendleton, L., & Binder, E. F.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
Corresponding author
Lenze, Eric J.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
708-712
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059453496
Cited by
55
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH083868)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
post-acute rehabilitation, skilled nursing facilities, older adults, treatment intensity, patient engagement, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, walking speed, functional outcome, Barthel Index, 6-minute walk test
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Exercise Therapy, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Missouri, Occupational Therapy, Patient Participation, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review